Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

bongbong

(5,436 posts)

31. Why not?

Reply to hack89 (Reply #27)

Mon Jan 14, 2013, 04:49 PM

Jan 2013

Your buddy Ted should solicit some lobbying business from companies that make RPGs. Then the NRA would have more than just gun manufacturers to follow the orders of (and collect money from).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you think no limit should be placed on your 2nd amendment to keep and bear arms.... [View all] DainBramaged Jan 2013 OP

I was listening to some NRA guy ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #1

You lose rights of citizenship when you commit a felony. former9thward Jan 2013 #3

No you don't ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #5

You do. former9thward Jan 2013 #7

No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #10

I don't know why you are trying to fight reality. former9thward Jan 2013 #15

I don't know why you are trying to fight reality ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #20

The right to vote is in the Constitution. former9thward Jan 2013 #38

Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #39

Yes you can. They can be removed by due process, such as a court action. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #18

Again, No you don't ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #21

The second comes to mind. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #22

Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #26

You can have a restriction imposed as a condition of release. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #29

The answer is yes nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #4

It also bears mentioning that the definition of "arms" includes all weapons of war dorkulon Jan 2013 #2

You seem to imply there are no or very few regulations about guns. former9thward Jan 2013 #6

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #9

Your links back up exactly what I posted. former9thward Jan 2013 #13

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #16

You are making fun of your own links. former9thward Jan 2013 #37

WOW! bongbong Jan 2013 #41

LOL indeed. The "20,000 laws" NRA talking point might be the dumbest one of all. DanTex Jan 2013 #25

Well... bongbong Jan 2013 #28

Not in American legal tradition hack89 Jan 2013 #8

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #11

Show me that RPGs are legal first. hack89 Jan 2013 #12

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #17

Because the NRA supports the NFA hack89 Jan 2013 #19

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #24

Because they don't want RPGs to be legal - that's what Ted told me. nt hack89 Jan 2013 #27

Why not? bongbong Jan 2013 #31

Because they are not firearms. hack89 Jan 2013 #32

Wrong again bongbong Jan 2013 #33

Here is how US law defines RPGs hack89 Jan 2013 #34

Still dodging bongbong Jan 2013 #36

I like you - you are funny. nt hack89 Jan 2013 #40

At least you're consistent bongbong Jan 2013 #42

Because I cannot answer a nonsensical question about the NRA hack89 Jan 2013 #43

LOL bongbong Jan 2013 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Jan 2013 #45

I'm for getting out of everything mentioned. Puzzledtraveller Jan 2013 #14

Fortunately, I DON'T hold that view. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2013 #23

I'm all for it. Glassunion Jan 2013 #30

......Then You're Clearly Not Familiar With American Constitutional Law ChoppinBroccoli Jan 2013 #35