Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Quentin Tarantino shuts down interviewer over questioning about violence [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)85. So who wants to make the argument?
This argument has been made throughout history.
Jane fucking Austen defended female novel readers because society in her time were sure that novel reading was going to lead to the downfall of female virtue.
Since when are artists not allowed to depict the REAL violence that occurred to REAL PEOPLE who were so desensitized by their exposure to putrid stories in the bible... that were twisted to endorse what they already wanted to do?
I mean, honestly, if you look at it, the Civil War was the most violent conflict in this nation's history. How violent was the media of the time? ooh, ooh, I know, I know! (holding up my hand.) It was nothing compared to the realistic depictions we see today, beyond battle scene photos of dead soldiers.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Quentin Tarantino shuts down interviewer over questioning about violence [View all]
joeybee12
Jan 2013
OP
He could have answered the question honestly instead of sounding defensive about it.
randome
Jan 2013
#2
I don't like movie violence but Kill Bill was so over the top, I couldn't take it seriously
tavalon
Jan 2013
#97
I push the envelope a little with my daughters but I try not to do that too much.
randome
Jan 2013
#24
I think you're making a mistake not seeing it--the violence in this movie is actually important--
Moonwalk
Jan 2013
#86
Whitewash History? Sheesh, after Inglorious Basterds attempted to rewrite the Holocaust?
graham4anything
Jan 2013
#111
Agreed. The interviewer is entitled to ask, but he's not obliged to answer. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2013
#82
Tarantino is making whites talk about race privilege. He's not over-rated at all, imo
RainDog
Jan 2013
#7
I just heard about it when the Oscar nods came out. Damn this movie sounds confusing
Number23
Jan 2013
#55
Good for him. The question itself is weaponized, it is a passive aggressive way of accusing him
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2013
#15
He is so good he ruined a generation of directors who can help but copy him.
Exultant Democracy
Jan 2013
#113
Tarantino is similar to a pornographer/panderer--would anybody see his films WITHOUT the cartoonish
Romulox
Jan 2013
#37
The only way to understand Tarantino is to remember that he worked in a video store.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2013
#40
I taught film studies, but not Tarantino. My students, still, had a familiarity with
ancianita
Jan 2013
#49
Thank you, too! I'm really sorry to hear about Jackson. Samuel L. Jackson truly did get shafted.
ancianita
Jan 2013
#106
Just saw it today. GREAT film. Will probably go see it again before it's out of theatres.
NYC Liberal
Jan 2013
#61
A monkey sells what he knows is popular, a monkey puts out there what he knows will bring
2on2u
Jan 2013
#76
The man is an artist. He's so forthcoming about his craft and his process. I think
Ed Suspicious
Jan 2013
#79
Read this interview with Kerry Washington before you pass any knee-jerk judgement...
Moonwalk
Jan 2013
#87
Actually, what's upsetting most of the right-wing media is that this movie is about a black man...
Moonwalk
Jan 2013
#90
I don't like a lot of Tarantino's movies but he's a talented guy and smart as a whip
tavalon
Jan 2013
#95
He is the rightwing dream using every single NRA soundbyte and making millions.
graham4anything
Jan 2013
#110