Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bubbayugga

(222 posts)
39. you weren't intoxicated. This guy was. You were unlikely to vomit. this guy as likely to vomit.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 11:24 AM
Jan 2013

Restraining him was appropriate. It wasn't necessary to duct tape his mouth shut however. This was done for the convenience of the passengers and crew, not for their safety. Furthermore, the airline shouldn't allow people to drink if they don't want people to get drunk. Their policy contributed to this situation. Multiple studies confirm that a person's tolerance to alcohol decreases significantly at high altitudes. This guy, like countless other airline passengers over the years, didn't understand that before he started drinking like normal. He made a mistake but that was no reason to endanger his life. As far as keeping him under constant watch, I don't think that is sufficient. It doesn't take a lot to cause an aspiration morbidity or mortality. It was an unnecessary risk. I think a good lawyer could really make a case here which is something I would love to see because I fucking hate the airlines.

No. But then, I'm an old lady. WinkyDink Jan 2013 #1
You are probably strong then you think davidpdx Jan 2013 #15
I don't fly, and that is why. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #2
I wouldn't… If he used a safe word nt MrScorpio Jan 2013 #3
What's "unruly"? n/t FBaggins Jan 2013 #4
No. I also probably wouldn't attack a terrorist hijacker. dkf Jan 2013 #5
I am an old lady but newfie11 Jan 2013 #6
I would definitely try talking to him first to calm him down. Prometheus Bound Jan 2013 #7
If It Was Obviously Required, Yes. Paladin Jan 2013 #8
^^^ This. Iggo Jan 2013 #16
Do you think that guy's civil rights were violated or something? randome Jan 2013 #9
I agree that taping his mouth was wrong. SummerSnow Jan 2013 #19
If need be yes madokie Jan 2013 #10
Do I get to kick his ass once he's secured? JoePhilly Jan 2013 #11
Sure - if that's what it took to make him a non-danger to others. nt jmg257 Jan 2013 #12
No way. They could have killed him by duct taping his mouth shut like that. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #13
Yet jaw surgery patients routinely have their jaws wired shut following operations pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #17
Explain it to the jury when he dies from choking on his vomit. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #26
Under constant watch, he was not going to die from aspiration pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #33
you weren't intoxicated. This guy was. You were unlikely to vomit. this guy as likely to vomit. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #39
Jaw surgery patients don't get intoxicated, lol? pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #40
Yes. Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #14
It's hard with a hypothetical davidpdx Jan 2013 #18
A plane in flight Shankapotomus Jan 2013 #20
LOL. Right on. I'll start carrying some duct tape in case someone starts taking about Hannity or FSogol Jan 2013 #32
I'm an old lady and damn right I would assist - lynne Jan 2013 #21
This about his mouth obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #31
Why not? I've seen much worse things done with duct tape. Orrex Jan 2013 #22
I hope you remembered your safe word pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #23
(Problem is, if one's mouth is taped shut, they can't say it!) Buns_of_Fire Jan 2013 #24
If you're smart, your safe word is "Mmmmffff!" pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #25
Excellent! Buns_of_Fire Jan 2013 #27
Same here pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #37
It would really depend on the situation Marrah_G Jan 2013 #28
This is an case by case situation... Earth_First Jan 2013 #29
Yes obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #30
Absolutely.... diphthong Jan 2013 #34
FREE THE UNRULY PASSENGER!!! graywarrior Jan 2013 #35
Look who's talkin' pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #36
If it's like the 'unruly' guy last week, absolutely. sinkingfeeling Jan 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you assist in restr...»Reply #39