Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
41. Ha... well...
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 02:59 AM
Dec 2012

at least you admit (as any objectionable person would) that there is vast discrimination against men in family court. In your case its just not at the top of your social agenda.

If nothing else, that's a start.
Kansas is truly sinking lower than I could ever possibly imagine benld74 Dec 2012 #1
It's a nuthouse here. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #2
I have a high school buddy living just over the MO/KS line benld74 Dec 2012 #5
Life long proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #11
That's why it's not a good idea to ever donate your sperm bluestateguy Dec 2012 #3
Or your eggs for that matter. nt kelliekat44 Dec 2012 #13
Script rewritten, "Toto, I've a feeling we're in Kansas." nt jody Dec 2012 #4
Nice way to prevent couples from becoming parents if the are lesbian or the husband can't father. appleannie1 Dec 2012 #6
+1. Wonder if that's the agenda here. Bet it is. Squinch Dec 2012 #30
Absolutely the agenda here. Summer Hathaway Dec 2012 #51
kansas is sort of the test tube version of republican rule dembotoz Dec 2012 #7
A good friend of mine.......... Capt.Rocky300 Dec 2012 #8
From Portland to Olathe? SheilaT Dec 2012 #58
Does that mean the mother opened herself up to losing custody dkf Dec 2012 #9
Your wingnut slip is showing again Major Nikon Dec 2012 #17
So financial circumstance is never a consideration in custody? dkf Dec 2012 #22
So where does it say custody was in contention at all? Major Nikon Dec 2012 #24
i think it raises an interesting point FreeJoe Dec 2012 #27
I'm pretty sure this is already the case pretty much everywhere Major Nikon Dec 2012 #31
It isn't the poster who brought this up it is the state dsc Dec 2012 #38
Nothing in the story says anything about custody Major Nikon Dec 2012 #39
the money and custody come hand in hand dsc Dec 2012 #42
If he doesn't desire custody then it's a mute point Major Nikon Dec 2012 #43
He may well want it now dsc Dec 2012 #46
Sure. It's quite common for sperm donors to seek custody Major Nikon Dec 2012 #48
One who have to pay support otherwise dsc Dec 2012 #49
There's no indication that he's paying support now Major Nikon Dec 2012 #50
given the state of Kansas and elected judges dsc Dec 2012 #53
The SCOTUS has already ruled on it Major Nikon Dec 2012 #57
Storm donation is always a tricky proposition. Orrex Dec 2012 #34
What the hell's wrong with you? Dr. Strange Dec 2012 #54
It would sure seem so. Chemisse Dec 2012 #28
This department must be run by Todd Akin, just as stupid. Thinkingabout Dec 2012 #10
What's the matter with Kansas? Blue_In_AK Dec 2012 #12
What bullshit. The man has no parental responsibility here. ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2012 #14
He needs to "man up" and "pay up!" Spryguy Dec 2012 #15
What? Going to assume this was sarcasm (nt) Demo_Chris Dec 2012 #16
My god...I hope so! n/t Earth_First Dec 2012 #19
What? proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #20
Kansas is some scary shit. Punish any and all living apart from the teabagger-approved Care Acutely Dec 2012 #18
What a jerk-off thing to do (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2012 #21
So are they going to pursue the fathers of all forced and aborted births as well? kydo Dec 2012 #23
That's probably next on the agenda proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #35
The pressure to become a theocracy is growing in so much of this country. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #25
I hope this one goes to the US Supreme Court. nt raccoon Dec 2012 #26
This is a pretty interesting case. Chemisse Dec 2012 #29
Further proof that men have no rights in family court. aaaaaa5a Dec 2012 #32
Haha...yeah... Spryguy Dec 2012 #37
Ha... well... aaaaaa5a Dec 2012 #41
Men have all the rights and all the power. Everywhere. Spryguy Dec 2012 #56
Actually, I wouldn't call family court a "rare" example. Discrimination in this area is quite common aaaaaa5a Dec 2012 #59
Social Justice Theory would say you can't be biased against an oppressor. Spryguy Jan 2013 #60
Kansas is too screwed up to even drive through anymore CanonRay Dec 2012 #33
You've obviously not driven through the right part of Kansas proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #36
I-70 from Kansas City to Denver = surefire cure for coalition_unwilling Dec 2012 #45
So you slept from Topeka to Salina? proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #47
Christ on a cracker. TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #40
What if the mother was a single mom, who wanted to raise the child on her own... Romulox Dec 2012 #44
But, the mother wasn't a single mom. Kalidurga Dec 2012 #52
I spent a month in Kansas one afternoon. nt SDjack Dec 2012 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kansas pursues child supp...»Reply #41