Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I SWEAR this is not a 'flamebait' post, it is a serious question... [View all]CTyankee
(63,926 posts)38. Here are some ideas of sensible regulation from Norway...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I SWEAR this is not a 'flamebait' post, it is a serious question... [View all]
Ferretherder
Dec 2012
OP
We also live in the country and use our guns for when there is a need to protect our animals
peacebird
Dec 2012
#3
MY guns will kill precisely zero preschoolers next year or any other year.
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#14
Would you prefer "astronomically low but marginally greater than zero probability?"
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#29
1. Guns are fun to fire. 2. Foreign invasion? 3. Then, your "IF" is ridiculous and after 1 and 2.
Festivito
Dec 2012
#8
No, because the "argument" is "Keep guns away from the bad guys." And they would be identified HOW??
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#23
I have owned in the past too, not the antique guns you owned, but I knew people who did
Cleita
Dec 2012
#20
And private gun ownership did what, in those instances (unless you aren't speaking of the U.S.)?
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#24
Yes, this was an extreme outlier, that is true. He was a dedicated plotter who went to
CTyankee
Dec 2012
#40