Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I SWEAR this is not a 'flamebait' post, it is a serious question... [View all]rrneck
(17,671 posts)37. Well...
How long do you think it would take this guy to beat you to death? Or at least put you in the hospital long enough to destroy your life?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I SWEAR this is not a 'flamebait' post, it is a serious question... [View all]
Ferretherder
Dec 2012
OP
We also live in the country and use our guns for when there is a need to protect our animals
peacebird
Dec 2012
#3
MY guns will kill precisely zero preschoolers next year or any other year.
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#14
Would you prefer "astronomically low but marginally greater than zero probability?"
Lizzie Poppet
Dec 2012
#29
1. Guns are fun to fire. 2. Foreign invasion? 3. Then, your "IF" is ridiculous and after 1 and 2.
Festivito
Dec 2012
#8
No, because the "argument" is "Keep guns away from the bad guys." And they would be identified HOW??
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#23
I have owned in the past too, not the antique guns you owned, but I knew people who did
Cleita
Dec 2012
#20
And private gun ownership did what, in those instances (unless you aren't speaking of the U.S.)?
WinkyDink
Dec 2012
#24
Yes, this was an extreme outlier, that is true. He was a dedicated plotter who went to
CTyankee
Dec 2012
#40