Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,039 posts)

7. I Understand Incremental Improvements - However, I have Moved On To Ban All Firearms

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:45 PM

Dec 2012

eom

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A suggestion for a **very** different approach to gun control: [View all] Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 OP

5 Rounds In Thirty Seconds Could Equal 10 Murdered Children Per Minute cantbeserious Dec 2012 #2

Wishing will not make it so. Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #9

Apples and oranges Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #17

To Each Their Own - The Path Is Clear In the US - Repeal The 2nd Amendment cantbeserious Dec 2012 #21

Shotguns have a 3 shell limit RobertEarl Dec 2012 #3

You must never have heard of a SAIGA. LAGC Dec 2012 #23

What is a reasonable level of lethal-ness? rucky Dec 2012 #5

We will never ban guns. Not in our lifetimes. BUt we CAN slow them down. Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #8

Not a bad idea. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #10

I like your idea Sherman A1 Dec 2012 #12

How much do you know about firearm construction? derby378 Dec 2012 #13

How much do you know about competent engineers? Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #18

I don't see a way that's physically possible; do you have any ideas? Recursion Dec 2012 #14

How would I know? Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #19

Standard bullseye rapid fire competition is 5 rounds in 10 seconds. bluerum Dec 2012 #15

How would such a thing work? Llewlladdwr Dec 2012 #16

I have no clue because I am not an engineer Stinky The Clown Dec 2012 #20

Actually it would be much harder than you think ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #22

This is silly. k2qb3 Dec 2012 #24