Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(62,444 posts)

14. "There is more to this story than we are being told"

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 11:15 AM

Dec 2012

No, there is more to the story which you are declining to read.

"I hope this is overturned on appeal."

Uhm.... never mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Iowa Supreme Court says its OK for woman to be fired for being "irresistibly" attractive [View all] davidn3600 Dec 2012 OP

Full decision jberryhill Dec 2012 #1

What bullshit! smirkymonkey Dec 2012 #2

It mentions her behavior and dress. renie408 Dec 2012 #3

This. ismnotwasm Dec 2012 #4

It wasn't about how she dressed or him being attracted jberryhill Dec 2012 #7

OOOhhhhh.... renie408 Dec 2012 #9

She worked there too jberryhill Dec 2012 #13

A lot of it had to do with the dentist's jealous wife too davidn3600 Dec 2012 #5

That was the actual question before the court jberryhill Dec 2012 #6

After 10 1/2 years???? JDPriestly Dec 2012 #8

Thank YOU! +1000 smirkymonkey Dec 2012 #11

"There is more to this story than we are being told" jberryhill Dec 2012 #14

Is one month's pay adequate damages? caraher Dec 2012 #18

maybe he would have fired the man dsc Dec 2012 #20

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2012 #27

As a dentist, I am uniquely qualified at least here, to say PCIntern Dec 2012 #10

According to the decision.... jberryhill Dec 2012 #22

Depends on how you interpret things caraher Dec 2012 #23

The pastor being there is pretty f-ing weird... jberryhill Dec 2012 #24

Agreed caraher Dec 2012 #25

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2012 #28

This is only saying it was not sexual discrimination. n-t Logical Dec 2012 #15

The actual decision makes more sense than the Yahoo! take on it caraher Dec 2012 #16