Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Why stop there? Tax alcoholic drinks. Fair's fair if you're talking about 'sin' taxes. CurtEastPoint Dec 2012 #1
California is beer and wine country...can't hurt the home teams ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #17
Are they really going to have enough revenue for that? LiberalFighter Dec 2012 #2
That kind of tax creates a disincentive for the state to discourage smoking slackmaster Dec 2012 #3
Great. Tax mostly very poor people for programs that serve the entitled rich. NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #4
And tax the oil companies already! BlueCaliDem Dec 2012 #7
As a healthcare worker. . . BigDemVoter Dec 2012 #5
Considering heart disease is the number one killer in the US magellan Dec 2012 #6
Bad food and alcohol don't do the damage that smoking does. BigDemVoter Dec 2012 #8
They should also tax soda at $1 a can, LeftofObama Dec 2012 #9
Why not do what Bloome, the repuke 1%er mayor do and just ban things we don't like? ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #18
Oh please, living longer costs more so smokers don't really cost more. Live and Learn Dec 2012 #11
So the $1 tax lost at the ballot box DJ13 Dec 2012 #10
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2012 #12
+2 slackmaster Dec 2012 #13
Why not an ammo tax instead? nt Live and Learn Dec 2012 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Bad_Ronald Dec 2012 #15
If Californians want higher education, let all Californians pay for it. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2012 #16
The problem is what happens when the sin taxes are successful and program they funded ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #19
As a non-smoking CSU employee, I'm against this effort petronius Dec 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California smokers may ge...»Reply #17