Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)
Thu Dec 13, 2012, 11:28 AM Dec 2012

Brilliant Article: Why Republicans Can’t Propose Spending Cuts [View all]

This article is VERY worth the read.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/12/why-republicans-cant-propose-spending-cuts.html

“Where are the president’s spending cuts?” asks John Boehner. With Republicans coming to grips with their inability to stop taxes on the rich from rising, the center of the debate has turned to the expenditure side. In the short run, the two parties have run into an absurd standoff, where Republicans demand that President Obama produce an offer of higher spending cuts, and Obama replies that Republicans should say what spending cuts they want, and Republicans insist that Obama should try to guess what kind of spending cuts they would like.
Reporters are presenting this as a kind of negotiating problem, based on each side’s desire for the other to stick its neck out first. But it actually reflects a much more fundamental problem than that. Republicans think government spending is huge, but they can’t really identify ways they want to solve that problem, because government spending is not really huge. That is to say, on top of an ideological gulf between the two parties, we have an epistemological gulf. The Republican understanding of government spending is based on hazy, abstract notions that don’t match reality and can’t be translated into a workable program.
Let’s unpack this a bit. We all know Republicans want to spend less money. So the construction of the debate appears, on the surface, to be a pretty simple continuum based on policy preferences. Republicans like Mitch McConnell say government spending is “out of control” and would, at least ideally, like to bring it into line with revenue entirely through spending cuts. Democrats like Obama endorse a “balanced” solution with revenue and taxes. Right-thinking centrists, like the CEO community and their publicists like Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei, think we should cut deeply into entitlement spending while also raising tax revenue. (VandeHei, in a video accompanying his execrable story, asserts, “There’s money to be cut everywhere.”)
There really isn’t money to be cut everywhere. The United States spends way less money on social services than do other advanced countries, and even that low figure is inflated by our sky-high health-care prices. The retirement benefits to programs like Social Security are quite meager. Public infrastructure is grossly underfunded.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
kicking for a good read. Melissa G Dec 2012 #1
first of all... phantom power Dec 2012 #2
That "big fat low-hanging fruit"... Johnyawl Dec 2012 #7
True, but mac56 Dec 2012 #13
Then convert the MIC sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #24
i like your fish DonRedwood Dec 2012 #32
Actually, sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #39
We spend billions outside this country on defense. upaloopa Dec 2012 #26
I kill people mindwalker_i Dec 2012 #27
All those good paying union jobs can be retained iemitsu Dec 2012 #34
You nailed it Phantom power: rainy Dec 2012 #12
Yes indeed! NT Sadiedog Dec 2012 #31
Sometimes stating what IS the obvious but unrecognized reality..... Sheepshank Dec 2012 #3
"How much am I bid for these hostages?" TahitiNut Dec 2012 #4
The funny thing is that Obama already stuck his neck out. backscatter712 Dec 2012 #5
I'd like to see POTUS be first to name vlyons Dec 2012 #6
Don't hold your breath... Johnyawl Dec 2012 #8
Why would promoting DOD cuts be "stupid"? closeupready Dec 2012 #14
The Republicans are SO screwed. Stonepounder Dec 2012 #15
Yep. And I think everyone sees it, too. closeupready Dec 2012 #19
I don't understand... docgee Dec 2012 #9
I think Medicare B & D is partially funded via income tax? LeftInTX Dec 2012 #16
Because they want to get their fingers on all that money... ReRe Dec 2012 #38
it is good article riverbendviewgal Dec 2012 #10
I don't agree with this point: ProSense Dec 2012 #11
It's even worse... Liberal1975 Dec 2012 #17
Yep ... "spending less money" is not what the Republicans are really after. Martin Eden Dec 2012 #30
This would be a great time to DEFINE the rethugs by what we "THINK" they want to cut the let them... uponit7771 Dec 2012 #18
CUT DEFENSE! nt s-cubed Dec 2012 #20
+1 SunSeeker Dec 2012 #35
Boner wants to suck America dry now so he can give to wealthiest.. Cha Dec 2012 #21
Republicans, policy and propaganda JackHughes Dec 2012 #22
Cut our bloated defense budget horsedoc Dec 2012 #23
GREAT ARTICLE and the links in the article are must reads underpants Dec 2012 #25
These paragraphs: freshwest Dec 2012 #28
very good read. I was impressed at "epistomological" :) BlancheSplanchnik Dec 2012 #29
There is actually lots of money that can be cut Bjorn Against Dec 2012 #33
The problem in four parts jmowreader Dec 2012 #36
"simply pretended the federal government could have everybody do a lot more work for less pay" nxylas Dec 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Brilliant Article: Why R...