Judge Rules evidence of Romney/ Bain Cap organized crimes is forbidden. Whistleblower Banned

[jberryhill]

3. That's the order that the court issued

It is not disrespectful, it is what the court order said. Actually, the interesting part of the order is this:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the All Writs Act, the Court has the power to bar further pleadings by Mr. Haas in these circumstances, see 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); United States v. Gomez-Rosario, 418 F.3d 90, 101 (1st Cir. 2005) (holding that courts have the ability to enjoin a pro se party from filing frivolous and vexatious pleadings); Shafii v. British Airways, PLC, 83 F.3d 566, 571 (2d Cir. 1996) (noting that an injunction is appropriate where a litigant engages in filing of repetitive and frivolous lawsuits); Cok v. Fam. Ct., 985 F.2d 32, 34 (1st Cir. 1993)(“Federal courts plainly possess discretionary powers to regulate the conduct of abusive litigants.”); In re Oliver, 682 F.2d 443,445 (3d Cir. 1982) (holding that an injunction restricting filings was necessary where the pleadings constituted a continuous pattern of groundless and vexatious litigation)


--------

I realize you believe you are on a great crusade to right some monumental injustice. That doesn't change the fact that a corporation cannot be represented "pro se" in a legal proceeding, or that ten years after the fact is too long to make a claim in an individual capacity after finding out that no lawyer will take your case. That is not because of a conspiracy of lawyers - there are lawyers on every side of every issue - but it is because your claim has no merit. Filing it again and again, and accusing everyone who disagrees with you to be a criminal doesn't make your claim any more convincing.