Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

TexasProgresive

(12,157 posts)
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 09:23 PM Dec 2012

Richard Trumka, "They're trying to take the Internet" [View all]

This year, they tried to take our cupcakes and our football referees. Now, they're
trying to take the Internet.

We don't usually email you about internet rights, but this is big. Next week, a UN
conference in Dubai will consider amendments to a treaty that would significantly
infringe on our internet policy.

This isn't hyperbole-the Internet as we know it is at risk. Sign the petition, and
support freedom of association and freedom of speech on the internet. [
act.aflcio.org/c/18/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=5157&tag=em20121203 ]

The International Telecommunications Union (or ITU), a United Nations agency, is
considering new rules that could clamp down on the fundamental freedoms of citizens
online. A group of giant internet corporations and countries, including China, Egypt
and Saudi Arabia-countries that already impose heavy restrictions on internet
freedoms-have put forward proposed regulatory changes to the UN World Conference on
International Telecommunications in December 3.

Under their proposals, governments and companies all over the world have much more
scope to restrict internet access and monitor what we do online.

So far the proposal has flown under the radar, but its implications are so serious
that we're mobilizing right now to make sure that the ITU and its member countries
know that we won't let them take away our right to free speech online. And this
won't just have repercussions in the US-people in poorer countries and under
dictatorships would be hurt even more.

If accepted, the changes would allow:
* Increased government restriction or blocking of information disseminated via the
internet;
* Creation of a global regime of monitoring internet communications, including the
demand that those who send and receive information identify themselves ;
* Requirement that the Internet only be used in a 'rational' way;
* Governments to shut down internet access if they decide that it may interfere in
the internal affairs of countries or that information of a 'sensitive nature'
might be shared;
* Introduction of a new pricing regime which would increase costs and slow down
internet growth, especially in the poorer countries.


So many workers are affected by internet policy, even if we don't think about it as
we go about our day. The Internet represents one of the few places in our world that
is open and accessible by everyone. We need to make sure our voices are heard before
US representatives head to the conference.

Stop the proposal to restrict the Internet in its tracks by signing right now:

go.aflcio.org/Stop-The-Net-Grab [
act.aflcio.org/c/18/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=5157&tag=em20121203 ]

In Solidarity,

Richard Trumka
President, AFL-CIO

*****

Visit us:
http://www.aflcio.org/
http://www.facebook.com/aflcio
http://twitter.com/#!/aflcio

Text WORK to AFLCIO (235246) to join our text action team. (Message and data rates
may apply.)


Edit to add link to petition:
http://act.aflcio.org/c/18/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=5157
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K & R Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2012 #1
K&R abelenkpe Dec 2012 #2
"requirement that the Internet only be used in a rational way" Enrique Dec 2012 #3
particularly with the freepers. n/t ejbr Dec 2012 #10
Does that mean no more pr0n? longship Dec 2012 #27
K&R Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #4
Trumka 2016. JaneyVee Dec 2012 #5
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2012 #6
Thanks TexasProgressive! Cha Dec 2012 #7
Of course they will. It is our most powerful tool. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #8
k & r! nt wildbilln864 Dec 2012 #9
Found this ThoughtCriminal Dec 2012 #11
I just love being right about Obama. The Doctor. Dec 2012 #32
They are not "trying"..... lib2DaBone Dec 2012 #12
Washington could care LESS about you and your family. i think you mean couldnt care less leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #22
K&R midnight Dec 2012 #13
K&R silverweb Dec 2012 #14
The main issues are continued US control of the Internet and about money FarCenter Dec 2012 #15
Here's a good video on the subject starroute Dec 2012 #16
Debunking rumors of an Internet takeover shawn703 Dec 2012 #17
Here we go again. cstanleytech Dec 2012 #18
Does seem a tad hyperbolic, tbh...... AverageJoe90 Dec 2012 #19
Well, it's part of the UN, so cue the black helicopters FarCenter Dec 2012 #21
it's a news outlet they fear b/c they dont have control over it leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #20
The planet needs a First Amendment. Octafish Dec 2012 #23
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. FarCenter Dec 2012 #25
K+R limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #24
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2012 #26
K&R rosesaylavee Dec 2012 #28
K&R patrice Dec 2012 #29
We won elections this year because of the internet. joeunderdog Dec 2012 #30
Done Tigress DEM Dec 2012 #31
Internet shutdown fueled the Arab Spring Eyes of the World Dec 2012 #33
Done Ninga Dec 2012 #34
k & r Berlum Dec 2012 #35
Sometimes, it seems, the UN is not compatible with the US Constitution. DhhD Dec 2012 #36
Why do I get the feeling this isn't what they are making it out to be. Could they jonesgirl Dec 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Richard Trumka, "The...