Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uh, messing with 401Ks and IRAs? [View all]hollysmom
(5,946 posts)43. could this be misleading and just be about
those who have 401Ks and not including those that did not opt in or did not have choice? One brother has 0 in 401K, he opted out because his wife is a spend thrift and he is non-confrontational.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
they had money in the company stock because a lot of companies required it back then
hollysmom
Nov 2012
#34
The company MATCH was required to be in Enron stock, and they weren't allowed to sell shares
Common Sense Party
Nov 2012
#38
No. Because it is a ridiculous idea that is not even being considered in the first place.
dawg
Nov 2012
#5
with health care costs and inflation people should have way, way, way more
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2012
#23
I have already suggesting putting protections in for people who have less than 2 to 3 million
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2012
#25