Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(26,883 posts)

11. There is no blue wave that gets us to 67 senate seats.

Reply to LaMouffette (Reply #7)

Sat Apr 27, 2024, 04:31 PM

Apr 27

If we win 100% of the races we're still several short... and we're far more likely to lose seats than pick even one up (let alone 16).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A way to purge the Supreme Court of the radical extremists: Impose a retirement age of 70. [View all] LaMouffette Apr 27 OP

You and which Constitutional amendment? NT mahatmakanejeeves Apr 27 #1

I agree. It's a long shot. A verrrrrry loooong shot. But I just did some googling and found out how the 27th Amendment LaMouffette Apr 27 #5

It isn't a radical idea... merely an unconstitutional one FBaggins Apr 27 #2

It's only unconstitutional until it becomes constitutional. But I agree that this idea is a very long shot. LaMouffette Apr 27 #6

How does it "become constitutional"??? FBaggins Apr 27 #10

Stop Polybius Apr 27 #3

Not yet we don't. But maybe with Roevember's Blue Wave coming . . . Still, you're absolutely right that at present, LaMouffette Apr 27 #7

There is no blue wave that gets us to 67 senate seats. FBaggins Apr 27 #11

We'll never have 67 votes Polybius Apr 27 #15

I'd prefer a fixed term for judges tinrobot Apr 27 #4

I like that idea, too. Seeing as how it looks like most of the current SC Justices were appointed in their fifties, that LaMouffette Apr 27 #8

If we are imagining theoretical amendments to change the court: LostOne4Ever Apr 27 #9

All excellent and well-thought-out ideas! Definitely agree that there need to be more checks and balances on the SC. LaMouffette Apr 30 #16

The Purge: Supreme Court Edition Kennah Apr 27 #12

I would like to change the pensions of Supreme Court Justices. LiberalFighter Apr 27 #13

As previously mentioned, it would be unconstitutional hardluck Apr 27 #14

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A way to purge the Suprem...»Reply #11