Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,514 posts)
12. I believe you're correct,
Sun Feb 11, 2024, 11:28 AM
Feb 2024

he's asking her to reconsider her order and she's giving time to Benedict's lawyers to respond to SC Smith's request.
We'll see how she handles this.

She put the brakes on that yesterday. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #1
Eileen Cannon goes Emily Litella. Girard442 Feb 2024 #3
thanks hookaleft Feb 2024 #4
Its just a stay pending appeal isn't it? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2024 #5
I believe so. nt MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #6
Probably "reconsideration" rather than appeal FBaggins Feb 2024 #11
I believe you're correct, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #12
Wouldn't surprise me if she gave them 3 months to answer bluestarone Feb 2024 #13
She gave them two weeks -- until February 23. onenote Feb 2024 #23
Gotta ask here WHY TWO WEEKS? bluestarone Feb 2024 #24
She gave Smith 24 hours to comply with an order. onenote Feb 2024 #26
It gives her two weeks to cook up a reason for another delay. Turbineguy Feb 2024 #33
You got that right! bluestarone Feb 2024 #36
So Cannon is pausing for "reconsideration" Fiendish Thingy Feb 2024 #14
Yes, Smith probably will seek intervention from the 11th circuit if the reconsideration is denied. onenote Feb 2024 #27
I don't FBaggins Feb 2024 #29
Resulting in further delays which is her goal Stargleamer Feb 2024 #39
See post 16. The stay relates to the order that would make public certain information given to Trump onenote Feb 2024 #17
Was there a time limit on TFG's lawyers to respond? (like she did with Smith) bluestarone Feb 2024 #22
You'd lose that bet. She gave them 2 week -- less than the rules would allow onenote Feb 2024 #28
Yea i would have lost. bluestarone Feb 2024 #31
Then why did she suspend her order while waiting for Trump's response and a decision. onenote Feb 2024 #41
Maybe to stop an appeal? (Smith would surely appeal) bluestarone Feb 2024 #42
But an appeal would delay things even longer wouldn't they? onenote Feb 2024 #44
Well, can't disagree with that. bluestarone Feb 2024 #45
Because if she didn't suspend it, that's the same as denying the reconsideration FBaggins Feb 2024 #43
It's become pretty confusing... which is typically a magat chaos strategy C_U_L8R Feb 2024 #7
It wasn't clear because the so-called experts commenting on it were careless in describing two orders onenote Feb 2024 #18
Thanks onenote. Very helpful. C_U_L8R Feb 2024 #34
Thanks. I had been wondering several times too. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #8
She's up to some mischief no doubt triron Feb 2024 #9
I don't doubt it. nt. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #10
Legal AF Popok said so last night bucolic_frolic Feb 2024 #2
I don't think she's smart enough..she's gotta be taking directions from someone/somewhere else Deuxcents Feb 2024 #15
He wasn't referring to the order that Smith was supposed to comply with last night. onenote Feb 2024 #20
That is not what was due to be delivered yesterday. The coverage has confused a lot of people onenote Feb 2024 #16
Thank you for the explanation and clarification, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 2024 #21
I agree its confusing, particularly because the so-called experts commenting on it have done a piss-poor job onenote Feb 2024 #25
Thank you. That's much clearer. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2024 #38
MAGATS have been sending her death threats, Emile Feb 2024 #19
Maybe she senses they may pull this important case from her. GreenWave Feb 2024 #30
You are correct. triron Feb 2024 #32
This one's not going to trial before the election. Scrivener7 Feb 2024 #35
I don't know which looks more Snackshack Feb 2024 #37
Cannon's mission is to delay trial until after the election...one issue at the time. Chainfire Feb 2024 #40
More delays either way. Win, win for trump. republianmushroom Feb 2024 #46
There was no appeal filed to challenge Judge Cannon's order last night. LetMyPeopleVote Feb 2024 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does anyone know if Jack ...»Reply #12