General Discussion

hookaleft

(938 posts) Sun Feb 11, 2024, 10:19 AM Feb 11

Does anyone know if Jack Smith appealed Cannon's new order? [View all]

The information about witnesses and statements was due to be delivered to team trump yesterday?

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone know if Jack Smith appealed Cannon's new order? [View all] hookaleft Feb 11 OP

She put the brakes on that yesterday. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 11 #1

Eileen Cannon goes Emily Litella. Girard442 Feb 11 #3

thanks hookaleft Feb 11 #4

Its just a stay pending appeal isn't it? Fiendish Thingy Feb 11 #5

I believe so. nt MarineCombatEngineer Feb 11 #6

Probably "reconsideration" rather than appeal FBaggins Feb 11 #11

I believe you're correct, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 11 #12

Wouldn't surprise me if she gave them 3 months to answer bluestarone Feb 11 #13

She gave them two weeks -- until February 23. onenote Feb 11 #23

Gotta ask here WHY TWO WEEKS? bluestarone Feb 11 #24

She gave Smith 24 hours to comply with an order. onenote Feb 11 #26

It gives her two weeks to cook up a reason for another delay. Turbineguy Feb 11 #33

You got that right! bluestarone Feb 11 #36

So Cannon is pausing for "reconsideration" Fiendish Thingy Feb 11 #14

Yes, Smith probably will seek intervention from the 11th circuit if the reconsideration is denied. onenote Feb 11 #27

I don't FBaggins Feb 11 #29

Resulting in further delays which is her goal Stargleamer Feb 11 #39

See post 16. The stay relates to the order that would make public certain information given to Trump onenote Feb 11 #17

Was there a time limit on TFG's lawyers to respond? (like she did with Smith) bluestarone Feb 11 #22

You'd lose that bet. She gave them 2 week -- less than the rules would allow onenote Feb 11 #28

Yea i would have lost. bluestarone Feb 11 #31

Then why did she suspend her order while waiting for Trump's response and a decision. onenote Feb 11 #41

Maybe to stop an appeal? (Smith would surely appeal) bluestarone Feb 11 #42

But an appeal would delay things even longer wouldn't they? onenote Feb 11 #44

Well, can't disagree with that. bluestarone Feb 11 #45

Because if she didn't suspend it, that's the same as denying the reconsideration FBaggins Feb 11 #43

It's become pretty confusing... which is typically a magat chaos strategy C_U_L8R Feb 11 #7

It wasn't clear because the so-called experts commenting on it were careless in describing two orders onenote Feb 11 #18

Thanks onenote. Very helpful. C_U_L8R Feb 11 #34

Thanks. I had been wondering several times too. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 11 #8

She's up to some mischief no doubt triron Feb 11 #9

I don't doubt it. nt. MarineCombatEngineer Feb 11 #10

Legal AF Popok said so last night bucolic_frolic Feb 11 #2

I don't think she's smart enough..she's gotta be taking directions from someone/somewhere else Deuxcents Feb 11 #15

He wasn't referring to the order that Smith was supposed to comply with last night. onenote Feb 11 #20

That is not what was due to be delivered yesterday. The coverage has confused a lot of people onenote Feb 11 #16

Thank you for the explanation and clarification, MarineCombatEngineer Feb 11 #21

I agree its confusing, particularly because the so-called experts commenting on it have done a piss-poor job onenote Feb 11 #25

Thank you. That's much clearer. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 11 #38

MAGATS have been sending her death threats, Emile Feb 11 #19

Maybe she senses they may pull this important case from her. GreenWave Feb 11 #30

You are correct. triron Feb 11 #32

This one's not going to trial before the election. Scrivener7 Feb 11 #35

I don't know which looks more Snackshack Feb 11 #37

Cannon's mission is to delay trial until after the election...one issue at the time. Chainfire Feb 11 #40

More delays either way. Win, win for trump. republianmushroom Feb 11 #46

There was no appeal filed to challenge Judge Cannon's order last night. LetMyPeopleVote Feb 11 #47