Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Senator Sanders: Let me be clear: NO MORE U.S. funding for Netanyahu's illegal, immoral war [View all]Mountainguy
(609 posts)65. Always happy that a Democrat won the nomination
and not Bernie.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senator Sanders: Let me be clear: NO MORE U.S. funding for Netanyahu's illegal, immoral war [View all]
Donkees
Jan 2024
OP
No, but generally the House does on funding bills, but even if the Senate moves first...
brush
Jan 2024
#5
My point is both the Sernate and the House have to approve of the bill before it goes to the president.
brush
Jan 2024
#7
In practice if origination is a concern, the Senate can strip out any House passed revenue bill
tritsofme
Jan 2024
#17
Meh. It's false. It's untrue. It's not "a war against the Palestinian people" *
Oopsie Daisy
Jan 2024
#10
so many RW Israelis absolutely look at it as a war on all of the Gazans and/or all Palestinians
Celerity
Jan 2024
#11
the ones quoted are power brokers, many of them in Netanyahu's RW coalition, a coalition in control of the war
Celerity
Jan 2024
#32
319 House Republicans. 50 Republican Senators. Umpteen Republican state legislators, governors....
paleotn
Jan 2024
#33
Exactly. The only way to beat the Gish Gallop is to be very simple and very direct.
paleotn
Jan 2024
#58
No it is not. You either clearly do not understand the definition of Gish gallop or are wilfully misusing the term.
Celerity
Jan 2024
#59
It is not 'the same stuff on every post' and your question is not germane to the discussion. It is sophistry, an attempt
Celerity
Jan 2024
#56
Not deflection. Simple question. Can you judge all of America by the party of Trump?
paleotn
Jan 2024
#57
I never judged all of Israel. I did not do so for the same logical reasoning I do not judge all of America by the 'party
Celerity
Jan 2024
#60
Thanks for your patience and integrity in this and other threads. Much appreciated.
TheRickles
Jan 2024
#75
They can't refute a single thing you presented, and so try to flip the argument and present strawman replies
TiberiusB
Jan 2024
#79
If you're going to use a phrase as an attempt at rebuttal, it is on you to at least use it correctly.
Celerity
Jan 2024
#63
No. Actually, no argument or "rebuttal" is needed (or warranted or deserved) *
Oopsie Daisy
Jan 2024
#72
Now we can add 'ad hominem' to the list of concepts you either do not understand or wilfully misuse.
Celerity
Jan 2024
#73
umm sorry the killers are responsible for those they kill, both israelis and hamas. nice try tho nt
msongs
Jan 2024
#14
Innocent Palestinians are dying by the thousands. The IDF is not selectively killing Hamas. nt
pnwmom
Jan 2024
#20
The best politicians do what's possible, rather than aiming for the impossible and achieving nothing *
Oopsie Daisy
Jan 2024
#62
Nah, I don't think Sanders desires here are at all relevant to how Biden will handle the issue.
tritsofme
Jan 2024
#22
The US is going to have to decide whether or not it will facilitate ethnic cleansing.
David__77
Jan 2024
#76