Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
9. I haven't attacked anyone
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 02:48 PM
Nov 2012

Disagreement does not constitute attack.

And to answer your last statement first, I agree that Republicans don't do what they say they will do. Personally, I hold Democrats to a higher standard. I voted for President Obama because I believe that he is telling the truth about where this country needs to go and how to get us there. If I had wanted to vote for a liar, I could have voted for Romney, as the policies he claimed to promote are better for me personally than President Obama's.

I'm not a fan of "say whatever you have to, truth or lies, just to get elected". YMMV.

So, I care what Obama says, and so do the other 65+ million people that voted for him. If he believes that a 91% top marginal tax rate is what we should go to, then that's what he should have run on. He would have most likely lost, but at least it would have been an honest loss.

You keep saying that "WE the PEOPLE" need to push him to this...where is you data that shows that "WE the PEOPLE" favor returning to Eisenhower-era top bracket rates?

I'm all for lifting the cap on the SS portion of payroll taxes, on taxing capital gains as regular income and for restoring the estate tax. But I don't believe that anyone should have to give up 91% of what they earn. As I said, YMMV.

And President Obama would explain that he said 39.6% not 91% how? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #1
Simple. bvar22 Nov 2012 #3
The problem is SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #6
I don't think your name fits your intentions RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #8
I haven't attacked anyone SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #9
Were we asked if we wanted to return to Eisenhower tax rates? RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #12
I would settle for the rolling back to the Reagan rates on the wealth klyon Nov 2012 #19
that might work- Republicans love the good ole days of Reagan RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #20
I'd start with lifting the cap on Social Security, then applying that tax to capital gains too. Scuba Nov 2012 #2
I like those too! bvar22 Nov 2012 #4
Negotiate from a position of power RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #21
I agree, but we also need to eliminate the $110K cap on SS in FICA. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #5
Best post of the day! RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #7
except we are not even fighting for that hfojvt Nov 2012 #10
But that is outside of the National public discourse RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #11
hey, if you say "yop" I will say "yop" right beside you hfojvt Nov 2012 #13
We have more power than you realize- WE won this election on Social Networks RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #15
7 recs for this thread hfojvt Nov 2012 #25
democrats are not immune to brainwashing from paid propagandists RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #27
The top effective rate during Eisenhower was closer to 50% SpartanDem Nov 2012 #14
The "effective rate" doesn't matter. bvar22 Nov 2012 #17
I agree. The idea that we are going back to the 39% Clinton rates for the rich is too kind. Ganja Ninja Nov 2012 #16
They looted the country, now they need to give it back RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #18
That wouldnt be enough davidn3600 Nov 2012 #22
All the MORE reason return to the successful Tax Rates of the 50s & 60s. bvar22 Nov 2012 #23
"START from a position that the RICH should do their Patriotic Duty to pay down the debt" RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #24
HEY!!! THom Hartmann brought up this very topic... bvar22 Nov 2012 #26
Go Thom Hartmann! RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #28
K&R forestpath Nov 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Letting the Bush Tax Cuts...»Reply #9