Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 07:53 AM Nov 2012

Franklin D. Roosevelt Letter Criticizing Democratic Party and Declining 1940 Nomination [View all]

When President Franklin D. Roosevelt made plans to run for a third term in 1940 he decided to drop conservative Vice President John Nance Garner from the ticket...Instead Roosevelt chose Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace. However, many of Garner's fellow conservative Democrats...despised Wallace for his liberalism and attempted to block his nomination at the convention...

Below is the letter which Roosevelt drafted, in which he vowed not to run if his fellow Democrats blocked his choice of Wallace. (In the end the letter was never sent, as a speech by Eleanor Roosevelt turned the tide for Wallace at the convention.) Roosevelt's letter, with its powerful critique of the Democratic Party, was published almost nowhere and was essentially unknown before it appeared in Oliver Stone's new Showtime documentary series Untold History of the United States...

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/must-read/franklin-d-roosevelt-letter-declining-1940-democratic-party-nomination


Franklin D. Roosevelt Letter to the Democratic Convention

July 18, 1940

Members of the Convention:

In the century in which we live, the Democratic Party has received the support of the electorate only when the party, with absolute clarity, has been the champion of progressive and liberal policies and principles of government.

The party has failed consistently when through political trading and chicanery it has fallen into the control of those interests, personal and financial, which think in terms of dollars instead of in terms of human values.

The Republican Party has made its nominations this year at the dictation of those who, we all know, always place money ahead of human progress.

The Democratic Convention, as appears clear from the events of today, is divided on this fundamental issue. Until the Democratic Party through this convention makes overwhelmingly clear its stand in favor of social progress and liberalism, and shakes off all the shackles of control fastened upon it by the forces of conservatism, reaction, and appeasement, it will not continue its march of victory.

It is without question that certain political influences pledged to reaction in domestic affairs and to appeasement in foreign affairs have been busily engaged behind the scenes in the promotion of discord since this Convention convened.

Under these circumstances, I cannot, in all honor, and will not, merely for political expediency, go along with the cheap bargaining and political maneuvering which have brought about party dissension in this convention.

It is best not to straddle ideals.

In these days of danger when democracy must be more than vigilant, there can be no connivance with the kind of politics which has internally weakened nations abroad before the enemy has struck from without.

It is best for America to have the fight out here and now.

I wish to give the Democratic Party the opportunity to make its historic decision clearly and without equivocation. The party must go wholly one way or wholly the other. It cannot face in both directions at the same time.

By declining the honor of the nomination for the presidency, I can restore that opportunity to the convention. I so do.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What was true then, is true now. yends21012 Nov 2012 #1
Roosevelt was a well known troll UnrepentantLiberal Nov 2012 #2
He was a DINO TahitiNut Nov 2012 #3
I am a Proud, "New Deal Democrat." dotymed Nov 2012 #16
Me too! ananda Nov 2012 #18
"It is best not to straddle ideals." This should be required reading for all Democrats. Scuba Nov 2012 #4
The 1938 elections was responsible for seating Republicans in Congress who were bent on ending the DhhD Nov 2012 #5
"Republicans always place money before human progress" People never patricia92243 Nov 2012 #6
All of this could be talking about today Hydra Nov 2012 #31
It makes me ill to think about how conservative the Democratic Party really is. Larry Ogg Nov 2012 #7
du rec. nt xchrom Nov 2012 #8
FDR would be shocked to see how many Democrats today still put money ahead of people. Octafish Nov 2012 #9
Read this, 3rd way tools: 99Forever Nov 2012 #10
Executive Order 9066... SidDithers Nov 2012 #11
Now imagine if Obama were to round up all Arab Americans into prison camps solely for being Arab. NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #15
And that negates the truth of the letter exactly how? bread_and_roses Nov 2012 #23
It may not be meant to. Octafish Nov 2012 #29
You are exactly right bread_and_roses Nov 2012 #30
What happens when "pragmatism" gets in Cerridwen Nov 2012 #24
Amazing. aandegoons Nov 2012 #12
Eleanor didn't take any BS either pocoloco Nov 2012 #13
I believe that there are lots of people who are equivalent or even better than FDR however... Larry Ogg Nov 2012 #26
But the Democrats did dump Wallace in 1944 in favor of Truman starroute Nov 2012 #14
The "Red Scare" tactics were coming back to the fore, as it was becoming clear that the BridgeTheGap Nov 2012 #19
Yes, this letter has been in many FDR books, too. By 1940 he dumped Wallace WI_DEM Nov 2012 #17
"It is best not to straddle ideals" Are you listening, triangulators? BlueStreak Nov 2012 #20
yep heaven05 Nov 2012 #21
How Many of Us Actually Understand American Democracy and Liberalism? mckara Nov 2012 #22
Amazing how little has changed in 72 years. George II Nov 2012 #25
Two things are very funny about this post IMO grantcart Nov 2012 #27
love this!!!!! RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #28
Roosevelt was a batshit crazy intrasigent progressive purist. pa28 Nov 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Franklin D. Roosevelt Let...