Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wanna make Rush Limbaugh crazier than he already is? [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)47. Diclotican, Warren will be 67 in 2016. So might be the same situation. I'm hoping that
Warren will stay as many years as possible to steer the Senate in the best manner as it needs votes to turn around so many wrong decisions made since the 1990s. She's a lovely lady, no doubt of that:
Reagan took office in his early 70's. But I also note your compassion due to the phases of a person's life and interest. I agree, Hillary may not have any interest in being POTUS then.
We'll see who is likely to emerge after the 2014 elections, which will partly determine how much successful Obama's agenda will be in his last two years in office.
Reagan took office in his early 70's. But I also note your compassion due to the phases of a person's life and interest. I agree, Hillary may not have any interest in being POTUS then.
We'll see who is likely to emerge after the 2014 elections, which will partly determine how much successful Obama's agenda will be in his last two years in office.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nah. Warren has much more work to do in her new position before she runs on the WH ticket.
HopeHoops
Nov 2012
#4
Diclotican, Warren will be 67 in 2016. So might be the same situation. I'm hoping that
freshwest
Nov 2012
#47
Life expectancy of white American women with college degrees is 83.9 years.....
Bigmack
Nov 2012
#14
Easy answer... Hilary ain't Raygun! He was a taco short of a combination plate on his best day! nt
Bigmack
Nov 2012
#64
Nah, put her on the Supreme Court . . . that'll really get his knickers in a twist. :) n/t
ET Awful
Nov 2012
#23
She's too old, now, many say. She'd be better in a position to nominate a Scalia replacement.
ancianita
Nov 2012
#35
I do think we're better off if _Repubs_ put old folks on the court but our guys should stay awhile.
Gidney N Cloyd
Nov 2012
#86
Why not? It's not as if there won't be two qualified ladies available. Is this some rule?
ancianita
Nov 2012
#37
No it's not a rule but it seems like political overreach to me. I like them both but it might seem
craigmatic
Nov 2012
#41
It's not a matter of gender it's a matter of giving some new people a chance.
craigmatic
Nov 2012
#69
I meant 2 first ladies. I don't care if 2 women democrats were the ticket next time. It'd probably
craigmatic
Nov 2012
#75
I don't know about that.It's the stuff they're made of..and I don't mean skin & genitalia.They r tuf
judesedit
Nov 2012
#52
I would love to see either scenario. They would be great for this country's future.
judesedit
Nov 2012
#49
Why should Democrats choose a Presidential candidate based in any way on what Rush Limbaugh thinks?
PoliticAverse
Nov 2012
#54
I am all for Hillary and will support her 100%! I voted for her in 2008 so I am hoping
NYC Liberal
Nov 2012
#79