Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
What should happen to the shooter? [View all]
'Good Samaritan' Who Killed Mall Shooter Broke Property Rules Against Guns
The good Samaritan who shot and killed the gunman who opened fire in the Greenwood Park Mall in Indiana on Sunday afternoon reportedly broke the property's policy against weapons.
The suspected shooter entered the mall on Sunday carrying a rifle and multiple magazines and opened fire in the food court, killing at least three and injuring three before he was shot to death. Greenwood Police Chief Jim Ison said the suspected shooter was killed by a "good Samaritan with a handgun."
While the armed bystander reportedly had a legal gun permit, the mall's property policy does not permit weapons on the premises.
The mall is owned by Simon Property Group, and the group's code of conduct, last updated in April of 2020, lists "No weapons" as number three.
https://www.newsweek.com/good-samaritan-who-killed-mall-shooter-broke-property-rules-against-guns-1725586
The good Samaritan who shot and killed the gunman who opened fire in the Greenwood Park Mall in Indiana on Sunday afternoon reportedly broke the property's policy against weapons.
The suspected shooter entered the mall on Sunday carrying a rifle and multiple magazines and opened fire in the food court, killing at least three and injuring three before he was shot to death. Greenwood Police Chief Jim Ison said the suspected shooter was killed by a "good Samaritan with a handgun."
While the armed bystander reportedly had a legal gun permit, the mall's property policy does not permit weapons on the premises.
The mall is owned by Simon Property Group, and the group's code of conduct, last updated in April of 2020, lists "No weapons" as number three.
Should the person who carried concealed against property rules face consequences for violatingthose rules and ultimately killing a person?
| 33 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
| Felony charges | |
1 (3%) |
|
| Misdemeanor charges | |
2 (6%) |
|
| He should be fined | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Banned from the mall for life | |
4 (12%) |
|
| Revocation of right to own/carry guns | |
5 (15%) |
|
| Civil lawsuits | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Several of above plus felony charges | |
0 (0%) |
|
| Several of above plus misdemeanor charges | |
3 (9%) |
|
| Nothing, his actions were within the law | |
18 (55%) |
|
| 2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
