General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: And Then There Were Three: Third Grand Jury Refuser Goes to Prison [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)And this has nothing to do with Dr. King anyhow, bringing his name wrongly into the thread is from the other side the same as bringing Hitler's name into it.
You cannot equate the two. I do not see slavery here, do you? I do not see 10000s who were lynched here, do you? I do not see the comparison.
Same as I see no comparison between OWS and say Mark Rudd, who according to statements on his website (and who backed Obama in 2008),as he grew up saw that you change the system from within and not try to blow it up.
Work to change the laws not liked.
(reminds me of the serenity connard
grant me the serenity to change the things I can
know the things I cannot change
and to accept the difference
and by the way, the Rudd example I use is meant to show, what worked in the 50s 60s early 70s does not mean it will work in 2012. And with other opposing forces in play, it only gives power to the right to exploit a fracture. Something we did not have in the 60s/70s.
this like so many other issues can be bettered argued after election, but nothing will change for the better if the wrong of the two people win.(and I mean the wrong person is if Mitt/Glove win).