Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grahamhgreen

grahamhgreen's Journal
grahamhgreen's Journal
October 22, 2013

"Obamacare sites cost more than Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn"

OK, I think investigations and maybe some prosecutions are in order.

500+ million - follow the money.

“Given the complicated nature of federal contracts, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison between the cost to develop Healthcare.gov and the amount of money spent building private online businesses. But for the sake of putting the monstrous amount of money into perspective, here are a few figures to chew on: Facebook, which received its first investment in June 2004, operated for a full six years before surpassing the $500 million mark in June 2010. Twitter, created in 2006, managed to get by with only $360.17 million in total funding until a $400 million boost in 2011. Instagram ginned up justt $57.5 million in funding before Facebook bought it for (a staggering) $1 billion last year. And LinkedIn and Spotify, meanwhile, have only raised, respectively, $200 million and $288 million.

http://rt.com/usa/obamacare-websites-cost-millions-002/

http://www.digitaltrends.com/opinion/obamacare-healthcare-gov-website-cost/
October 22, 2013

David Gregory asks on MTP "Obama wins, big whoop, can he lead?" Answer:

---He just did.---


Put that in ur think tank and smoke it, lol

(OK, in fairness, Gregory pretended he did not ask the question by *cleverly* quoting some blog or something)

October 2, 2013

Initial Impression of Obamacare: Pretty Good:)

My health care is covered by my company, but my roommate lives just above the poverty line in California.

For him, the "Silver Plus" plan (94% covered), is $28 to $45 per month (although he may get Medicare for free).

So, I am pleasantly surprised, thus far, I must say.

September 30, 2013

Had we expanded Medicare, we wouldn't be in this predicament, right?

Since Medicare is covered under the FICA taxes, the funds would still be available and the R's would not be able to pull this stunt.



The increasingly likely shutdown of the US government could have far-reaching effects throughout the US. If Congress fails to reach an agreement to avert a shutdown by midnight ET Monday, some services – mail delivery, Social Security and Medicare benefits – would not be affected.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/29/us-government-shutdown-services-affected


Yet another reason for Medicare for All, now, seems to me.
September 27, 2013

The world will add more solar power than wind this year, for the first time ever



Today saw good news for solar power, as Bloomberg's New Energy Finance group predicted 2013 would be the first year in which the world adds more solar power capacity than wind. The service predicted that 36.7 gigawatts of new solar power capacity would be added in 2013, up 20% from 2012, compared to 35.5 gigawatts of new wind power. The service credited the speed-up to new incentives in Japan and China, combined with a dramatic reduction in the cost of solar panels.

Wind installations still contribute more than twice as much power as solar, representing 5% of global power supply compared to solar's 2%, but new installations are slowing as Chinese and American incentives lapse and windmills face greater competition from newly cheap solar panels. Bloomberg predicts the coming years will see the technologies even out, respectively contributing 17% and 16% of global power supply by 2030.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/27/4777558/the-world-will-add-more-solar-power-than-wind-this-year-for-the-first
September 25, 2013

The 21 Things to Let Go to Become the Happiest Person in the World

12. Let go of all external validations. You know yourself better than anyone else. You also know, both instinctively and intellectually, what’s best for you. That doesn’t mean there’s any shortage of people in the world who would love nothing more than to tell you what to do. Don’t listen to them.


What the superior man seeks is in himself; what the small man seeks is in others. – Confucius





MORE: http://www.knowledgeformen.com/the-21-things-to-let-go-to-become-the-happiest-person-in-the-world/
September 22, 2013

No War for Al Qaeda!




A reminder from David__77
September 17, 2013

50 Largest Companies Produce 73% of Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions

A new study has found that just 50 corporations are responsible for 73% of the 3.6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emitted by the world’s 500 largest companies. Of the carbon-polluting corporations the most egregious offenders are, perhaps unsurprisingly, to be found within the energy sector, and as a whole, these companies are doing little to change their ways; the CDP Global 500 Climate Change Report 2013 found that the 50 giants have become even greater polluters in the last four years.

The CDP Global 500 Climate Change Report is published by PricewaterhouseCoopers, and calculates and analyzes the emissions and disclosures of the Global 500 companies by industry (403 of the companies took part in this year’s study). A number of the findings are largely unsurprising: Wal Mart is the greatest offender within the ‘Consumer Staples’ category and ExxonMobil in the Energy sector. Interestingly, Bank of America has the greatest emissions per unit of revenue in the Financial sector, Bayer in Healthcare, Samsung in Information Technology and Verizon in Telecommunications.

While GHG emissions from the Global 500 fell overall in recent years—from 4.2 to 3.6 billion metric tons—the top 50 corporations have managed to increase their emissions by 1.65% since 2009. This represents, the report states “a disparity between the companies’ strategies, targets and the emissions reductions that are required to limit global warming to 2 degrees C.”

http://inhabitat.com/10-of-worlds-largest-companies-produce-73-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions/

Profile Information

Member since: Thu Dec 30, 2004, 03:05 PM
Number of posts: 15,741
Latest Discussions»grahamhgreen's Journal