Demeter
Demeter's JournalHow I Exposed an Undercover Cop By Lacy MacAuley
http://otherwords.org/i-exposed-an-undercover-cop-lacy-macauley/She was an undercover cop who called herself Missy. When I first met her four years ago, I couldnt have known that the small-framed woman with spiky brown hair and intense eyes was anything but a fellow activist showing up for a protest in Washington, D.C. I certainly didnt know she was actually Nicole Rizzi, an undercover cop ordered to secretly spy on peaceful protesters, violate our freedom of speech and assembly, and disregard our right to privacy.
Sure, I thought something was odd about her. She stared just a little too long. Her irreverent sense of humor made the hair stand up on the backs of a lot of necks. Her favorite t-shirt read OBEY and it wasnt clear that she wore it for the irony. When I looked at her rippling arm muscles, I wondered whether they came from workouts at some spy academy or a downtown yoga studio.
So sure, I did suspect from the start that she could be an FBI agent, a police officer, or something else. But if you start being suspicious of newcomers, every honest newbie will look like an infiltrator. I kept my paranoia mostly to myself...The Twitter account was shocking. There was Missy tweeting about the daily grind of working for the District of Columbias Metropolitan Police Department. There were photos of her at the shooting range and a photo of her giant walkie-talkie. There were tweets about the academy and the new morgue.
There was a comment about her working during Barack Obamas presidential inauguration on ninja assignment, and a remark that reading Miranda rights isnt actually required...Spying on protesters is the worst violation of our freedom. It not only disregards the freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and right to privacy of the people who are being spied upon, it makes us crazed and paranoid. One person who turns out to be an infiltrator can keep us pointing fingers at each other for years. It makes us distrustful of people we dont know, instead of finding safe ways to welcome newcomers and building vibrant social movements.
Distrust can mean slow death for a group of any kind...
MORE
Weekend Economists Going for the Gold August 9-11, 2013
As promised, we will look at MEDALS: Starting with this one:
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-to-award-oprah--bill-clinton-presidential-medal-of-freedom-214439983.html
President Barack Obama announced on Thursday the latest recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor presented to "individuals who have made especially meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States," "world peace" or to "cultural or other significant public or private endeavors." Among them, two of the president's biggest political supporters: Oprah Winfrey and former President Bill Clinton. According to the White House release, Winfrey is being honored as "one of the worlds most successful broadcast journalists" and for "philanthropic causes and expanding opportunities for young women."
Winfrey and Clinton aren't the only Presidential Medal of Freedom recipients with historical ties to Obama. The late Democratic Sen. Daniel Inouye represented Obama's home state of Hawaii on Capitol Hill. Ernie Banks, the Hall of Fame slugger, played his entire career for the Chicago Cubs the crosstown rival of the White Sox, the president's preferred hometown team. And former Sen. Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican who served with Obama on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when Obama was a junior senator from Illinois, will be honored for his "bipartisan leadership and decades-long commitment to reducing the threat of nuclear weapons."
The Presidential Medal of Freedom goes to men and women who have dedicated their own lives to enriching ours," Obama said in a statement announcing this year's list.
I CANNOT BELIEVE HE OPENLY REVEALED THAT!--DEMETER
Also among the 16 recipients named on Thursday were writer and women's rights activist Gloria Steinem; the late Sally Ride, the first American female astronaut to travel to space; jazz trumpeter, pianist and composer Arturo Sandoval; and legendary college basketball coach Dean Smith. Two advisers to the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Cordy Tindell "C.T." Vivian and the late Bayard Rustin were named for their efforts during the civil rights movement.
The awards will be presented at the White House later this year. More than 500 people have received the Presidential Medal of Freedom since President John F. Kennedy established it in 1963.
When JFK started this, I'm sure he had something a little nobler, and less self-serving, in mind....after all, his book Profiles in Courage didn't extend to women who buy houses like pairs of shoes....or men who pardon merchants of death and fraud....
But that's just me. I'm cranky and tired and I really need a Vacation after my "vacation".
So, I'm off to play Euchre, this being the designated night, and I'll return to post more of the coming Apocalypse. Be seeing you!
PS: We all know who #2 is, who is #1?
Weekend Economists Ask: Is It Haute Enough for You? August 2-4, 2013
Xchrom asked that this weekend be dedicated to food. One can only presume that X is in the throes of 1) a rigorous diet of limited range, or 2) feeding the ravening hoards that summer entertaining brings to the table.
Since there's no limits on this topic, give us your best receipts: whatever you would be cooking and eating, if you weren't reading this thread....
Haute cuisine was characterised by French cuisine in elaborate preparations and presentations served in small and numerous courses that were produced by large and hierarchical staffs at the grand restaurants and hotels of Europe....
HISTORY
The 17th century chef and writer La Varenne marked a change from cookery known in the Middle Ages, to somewhat lighter dishes, and more modest presentations. In the following century, Antonin Carême, born in 1784, also published works on cooking, and although many of his preparations today seem extravagant, he simplified and codified an earlier and even more complex cuisine.
Georges Auguste Escoffier is a central figure in the modernisation of haute cuisine as of about 1900, which became known as cuisine classique. These were simplifications and refinements of the early work of Carême, Jules Gouffé and Urbain François Dubois. It was practised in the grand restaurants and hotels of Europe and elsewhere for much of the 20th century. The major developments were to replace service à la française (serving all dishes at once) with service à la russe (serving meals in courses) and to develop a system of cookery, based on Escoffier's Le Guide Culinaire, which formalized the preparation of sauces and dishes. In its time, it was considered the pinnacle of haute cuisine, and was a style distinct from cuisine bourgeoise (cuisine for families with cooks), the working-class cuisine of bistros and homes, and cuisines of the French provinces.
The 1960s were marked by the appearance of nouvelle cuisine, as chefs rebelled from Escoffier's "orthodoxy" and complexity. Although the term nouvelle cuisine had been used in the past, the modern usage can be attributed to authors André Gayot, Henri Gault, and Christian Millau, who used nouvelle cuisine to describe the cooking of Paul Bocuse, Alain Chapel, Jean and Pierre Troisgros, Michel Guérard, Roger Vergé and Raymond Oliver, many of whom were once students of Fernand Point.
In general, nouvelle cuisine puts an emphasis on natural flavours, so the freshest possible ingredients are used, preparation is simplified, heavy sauces are less common, as are strong marinades for meat, and cooking times are often reduced. While menus were increasingly short, dishes used more inventive pairings and relied on inspiration from regional dishes. Within 20 years, however, chefs began returning to the earlier style of haute cuisine, although many of the new techniques remained...wiki
There are actually several kinds of French cookery: from the extremely simple to the extremely complicated, depending on whether it was destined for the peasants or the princes.
Why, just this afternoon I made quiche for a client:
Quiche is basically a humble cheese custard in a pie crust, with extra ingredients for flavor and variety.
To make the custard: blend 2 eggs with one cup of half and half, pour over a cup of shredded hard cheese (nothing wetter than mozzarella) in an unbaked 9 inch pie crust, and bake at 350F until a knife comes out clean. If the pie shell is larger, increase the quantities, and the baking may take a bit longer, too.
For flavor and variety, try any combination of these: (make sure ingredients are dry, too much water will mess up the custard)
chopped onion sauteed to golden brown
wilted spinach, chopped
cooked vegetables, bite-sized: carrots, broccoli, cauliflower, summer squashes, etc.
bacon bits (the real thing)
ham bits
seafood bits: cooked shrimp. lobster, flakes of white fish, crab, I I would think squid too chewy)
Be imaginative! But don't overload the pie--at least half of it should be custard, or it won't stick together.
As you can see, Quiche is extremely simple to make, although today in America it's considered Haute Cuisine. (Anything above pizza, burgers, subs and fries is haute cuisine today, especially in the Midwest.) The way to "elevate" a quiche is to go extravagant on the added ingredients or the type of cheese, and pick a really fine wine.
An Obamacare scorecard: Part 2 The hits, misses, and mixed reviews
http://www.cjr.org/the_second_opinion/an_obamacare_scorecard_part_2.php?page=all
...While the president has been focusing on some early small victorieslike the rebates some people are getting due to a provision in the lawat its core the Affordable Care Act is about insurance.
When it passed, it was about giving some 30 million of the 50 million people uninsured at the time, in 2010, a chance to get insurancefor some, to buy it with help from subsidies from the federal government, and for some others, getting it through Medicaid, via an extension of the existing federal/state program for the poor. A secondary goal was to get rid of some of the worst practices in the so-called individual market, which prevented sick people from obtaining coverage and well people from affording it. There was also talk that the law would slow down the rise in the cost of US medical care, though it arguably did not contain teeth strong enough to make that happen. Forces that could actually raise healthcare costslike consolidation in the insurance and hospital marketswould have continued with or without Obamacare. It is within this context that the Affordable Care Act to date must be scored. In Part 1 we examined what parts of the original law have been implemented, what parts are on hold, and what parts are gone. In this, Part 2, we assess the law as it stands so farits hits and its misses, as well as the parts that get mixed reviews....
...The next stage of Obamacare is the one that we should watch most carefully, as exchanges set up by the law start selling insurance policies to the unininsured and granting subsidies help people pay for themthe heart of the Affordable Care Act. If people get better insurance for the buck, and decide they can afford the coverage rather than pay the tax penalty, and sign up in drovesthats a huge hit. But its a complicated machine to start up and operate, and reporters need to watch closely. There are bound to be misses and mixed results. Whether they will undermine the success of the law is a big unknown. Neither the Democrats, the Republicans, or the press has a crystal ball.
An Obamacare scorecard Part 1: What’s gone, what’s on hold, and what’s still in place
http://www.cjr.org/the_second_opinion/an_obamacare_scorecard.php?page=allTHE LENGTH OF THIS ARTICLE IS PROOF POSITIVE THAT OBAMACARE IS COMPLICATED, UNFAIR, AND UNWORKABLE. AND THIS IS ONLY PART 1! BUT DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR IT, GO READ THE ARTICLE!
If Ever there was a litmus test for true democrats, it is Edward Snowden
Thanks to his bravery, I have shuffled a lot of trolls off into the Ignore Lists, where they may sit and jabber at each other.
Anyone who cannot recognize Snowden's enduring contribution to the US and the world is not worthy of one moment of my attention. It's the equivalent of bad-mouthing the Kennedys or MLK, Jr and the other civil rights martyrs. Or our Founding Fathers and Mothers.
Everyone is entitled to an opinon, but we all work with the same reality
And the facts are these:
The US GOVERNMENT is committing treason against its people and attacking the rest of the world with its spying.
These brave people quinnox listed exposed that, among others.
They are heroes of the People, the only LEGITIMATE source of government in a democracy (or any other government, for that matter).
(If you can't change the facts, just attack the messengers--or change the subject. But do it somewhere else, or you are going on my Ignore list!)
Even when that Teabagger is my Auntie?
She may be deluded and prejudiced, but she's family. With a dialog, we can find common ground, to the benefit of the family.
We have to bring the Teabaggers home, one by one. They are the abused, confused, lost sheep. We have to rescue them, just as we would any other cult victim: with love, support, and education.
Yours is the kind of party I wouldn't want to belong to
A party without any principles whatsoever beyond winning at all costs.
There's no "winning" without actually making change. If the only change you make is to "win" a beauty contest, that's not winning.
The GOP has goals. They are crazy, stupid, people-destroying goals, but they fervently believe in them.
I want a party that has smart, well-thought out, people-enhancing goals. And believe me when I say: Obamacare isn't cutting it.
I am more inclined to a new party: A Peoples' 99% Occupation Party
for three reasons:
1) It starts fresh without all the crap the GOP has heaped on the Democratic brand (and all the crap so-called Democrats have done to sully the name).
2) It permits people who were never Democrats and would never consider it, based on their prejudice or history, to reconsider their options and go for something other than the right-wing fundie Tea Party or the GOP Corporate brands.
3) A new party can be set up so that the message and the spokespeople are controlled by the grassroots, as opposed to any entrenched Establishment Elite.
On Edit:
The first reply to this post I cannot read, because I have that person on Ignore. If it's worth looking at, please advise...if it isn't, that's why he's on Ignore!
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Home country: USA
Member since: Thu Sep 25, 2003, 02:04 PM
Number of posts: 85,373