Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Autumn

Autumn's Journal
Autumn's Journal
April 8, 2019

We know why he voted against the 2007 comprehensive immigration reform bill, I agree with him

100% on his vote and his reasons for doing so. So it's safe to say the asshole King agrees with all Democrats on close boarders?

https://www.splcenter.org/20130218/close-slavery-guestworker-programs-united-states

When the Southern Poverty Law Center published the first version of this report in 2007, we recommended reform or repeal of the H-2 program. Unfortunately, even after the enactment of modest reforms in recent years, guestworker programs today are still inherently abusive and unfair to both U.S. and foreign workers.

In the past several years, the DOL has proposed two sets of regulations to better protect non-agricultural H-2 workers – one related to wage rate guarantees and one more comprehensive set of regulations. These regulations also would better protect the jobs and wages of U.S. workers. Unfortunately for workers, neither set of regulations has gone into effect; employers have filed multiple lawsuits challenging them, and Congress has effectively blocked implementation of the new wage regulations. For workers, then, the abuses continue unabated.


April 8, 2019

Write him a sternly worded letter. Who knows? He may decide change his answers

to please someone on a small message board. I think it's up to candidates to give their own answers to questions they are asked. The person didn't ask if all Democrats are for open borders. The person asked Bernie why he, Bernie, supported open borders. Bernie doesn't.

Most of us don't need him to explain his complete answer to a question at a political event because we read it in the complete context.

Like brush your teeth before you go to bed, or take a shower playing in the mud. See how context works? Without context it sounds like one is talking to a 4 year old. I don't think 4 year old attend political events and ask question of candidates.

When asked at an Oskaloosa, Iowa, town hall why he supported open borders, the 2020 White House candidate was quick to clarify his stance.

“I’m afraid you may be getting your information wrong," Sanders replied, according to The Washington Post. "I think what we need is comprehensive immigration reform.”

“Oh my god, there’s a lot of poverty in this world, and you’re going to have people from all over the world. And I don’t think that’s something that we can do at this point. Can’t do it,” the Vermont lawmaker continue


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/437790-bernie-sanders-blasts-open-borders-theres-a-lot-of-poverty-in-this-world
April 6, 2019

I don't watch TH's so I don't know his history. Which is the "hit piece" that made you suddenly

decide he was too biased? The tweet that says

“I appreciate his attempt to do better in the future, but to me this is not mainly about whether Joe Biden has adequate respect for personal space. It’s about women deserving equal respect in the workplace."


Or is the the article you highlighted titled "Joe Biden Isn’t the Answer"? I don't see anything wrong about either. The tweet reads as a well thought out opinion on the current situation. I read the article and it is actually pretty damn good. That is Joe Biden. That's his history and those aren't lies. Joe has always been in the sweet spot of the middle.
Maybe I have a different view of a "hit piece".

https://www.thecut.com/2019/03/joe-biden-isnt-the-answer-for-president-in-2020.html

It was a period of intense partisan realignment, in response to the upheavals of the 1960s and early ’70s, in which the American left was nervously coalescing around the interests and increased liberties of racial minorities and women, the populations who were forming what would be the most reliable part of its base.

The right, meanwhile, was sucking strength from a backlash against disruptive social movements, growing fat and drunk on the language of piety and family values that would undergird its ultraconservative defense of the old power structures, self-righteously fueling up for the Reagan era. Republicans had, for the foreseeable future, won white men — America’s original citizens, the ones around whom our narratives and priorities are calibrated.

Rather than lean into an energetic defense of the values of liberty, equality, and inclusion that might define their role against the racist and anti-feminist backlash of the era, the Democratic Party appeared anxious to distance itself from being the feminized “mommy party,” and shunt to the side — rather than vigorously advocate for — the priorities of women, especially poor women, and people of color.

The party continued to be represented and led by mostly white men. And while officially Democrats remained on the progressive side, supporting reproductive rights, civil rights, and affirmative action, a contingent of Those Guys, Joe Biden notable among them, made folksy rationalizations for abrogating, rather than expanding and more fiercely protecting, new rights and protections. Those Guys soothed; Those Guys were familiar; Those Guys enjoyed their own power and wanted to reassure everyone that it wasn’t really going to be so dramatically reapportioned.
April 5, 2019

Me Too Founder Tarana Burke Calls Biden's Response 'Disrespectful And Inexcusable'

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tarana-burke-joe-biden-response_n_5ca7b156e4b0dca033015554?fbclid=IwAR3y1zsJ9-RAD0EID16OX99eUlJa88-ogfbbLBnuVfT9HxsDuM2GMbI92po

Tarana Burke, founder of the Me Too movement, spoke out Friday in support of the women who have come forward to accuse Joe Biden of inappropriate behavior, calling out the former vice president’s joking response to the scandal as “disrespectful and inexcusable.”

In a Twitter thread, Burke argued that the seven women who say they received unwanted physical contact from Biden were right to speak up and that the likely 2020 contender appears be deeply missing the point they are trying to make.

“It’s about bodily autonomy, it’s about power and leadership,” wrote Burke, who first started using the phrase “Me Too” to raise awareness about the pervasiveness of sexual misconduct in 2006.

Burke’s comments came the same day Biden opened up a speech by making light of the news about his unwanted touches. He said of the man who introduced him onstage, “I just want you to know, I had permission” to hug him.


https://twitter.com/TaranaBurke/status/1114249674507149312
April 3, 2019

Beto praises 'courage' of Biden accusers, questions whether former VP should enter 2020 race

Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke became the latest 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful to weigh in on the allegations of unwanted touching and kissing leveled against former Vice President Joe Biden.


O’Rourke, who currently sits third in the polls alongside Sen. Kamala Harris of California and behind Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, praised the “courage” of the women who have come forward to accuse the former vice president of inappropriate behavior.

“We need to listen to those who are raising their stories who have the courage to come forward to share their experience and also to be part of the conversation about either his candidacy or how he fares as a contender for the nomination if he jumps in,” O’Rourke said Wednesday during an appearance at the National Action Network conference.

O’Rourke added: “I think ultimately that will be a decision for him to make but I’m glad people are willing to and have the courage to step up. They must be heard and must be listened to.”


http://590kid.com/beto-praises-courage-of-biden-accusers-questions-whether-former-vp-should-enter-2020-race/
April 3, 2019

Well consult your crystal ball again. How I feel about Biden is on record.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211844944#post33

Autumn (33,930 posts)

23. The only problem I will have is if Biden doesn't jump in the race.

He and Bernie are a big pluses and both fill a void I don't see the others as yet filling. IMO


Autumn (33,930 posts)

49. That cracked me up. Only Joe.

I want Trump beat and humiliated here and on the world stage. I want him whimpering and crying in the corner of a dirty omelet bar at his shitty golf course.





https://www.democraticunderground.com/1251543698#post19
Star Member Autumn (33,930 posts)

19. Biden has every right to run if he chooses to run. That he is having meetings

with donors shows that he is thinking about it. If he want's it to happen it will, no one else is trying to make it happen.
April 1, 2019

Hey, you go find a post or OP of anyone attacking a man for speaking out and I'll amend my post

to include a man. Again, I never said only one gender does it. This is about one woman being attacked by democrats for speaking out about inappropriate contact. Till then I stand by what I said,

https://www.democraticunderground.com/128745258#post15

Autumn (33,875 posts)

15. This is why women don't come forward. What should she have done? Slap the 2nd most

powerful man in the world on stage when he was there to campaign for her?


March 31, 2019

I believe her. But I can't find in her essay where she mentioned Cristobal Alex? Maybe you can

point it out Cha? I think he went out of his way to make himself a part of the story. Make himself look good for the boss, maybe? Talk about misrepresenting. I don't see where he's offering up the information that Biden hired him for his team. You should read the tweets to him. . This guy seems like a shitty friend.

Biden Nabs Big Name Latino Operative

“In the latest sign that Joe Biden will run for president, his team has brought on Cristóbal Alex, the head of the influential Latino Victory Fund,” Politico reports.
“It’s not clear what role Alex would fill in a Biden presidential campaign. He served as Hillary Clinton’s National Deputy Director of Voter Outreach and Mobilization in 2016.”
https://politicalwire.com/2019/03/06/biden-nabs-big-name-latino-operative/





https://www.thecut.com/2019/03/an-awkward-kiss-changed-how-i-saw-joe-biden.html
When I spoke to a male friend who is also a political operative in Biden’s orbit — the first man who had heard the story outside of my staff and close friends years ago — he did what no one else had and made me question myself and wonder if I was doing the right thing. He reminded me that Biden has significant resources and argued points that made me question my memory, even though I’ve replayed that scene in my mind a thousand times. He reminded me that my credibility would be attacked and that I should be prepared for the type of “back and forth” that could occur. (When reached by New York Magazine, a representative for Vice-President Joe Biden declined to comment.)

I’m not suggesting that Biden broke any laws, but the transgressions that society deems minor (or doesn’t even see as transgressions) often feel considerable to the person on the receiving end. That imbalance of power and attention is the whole point — and the whole problem.


March 31, 2019

Obviously he can. I hope the next Democratic president does the same.

A Democratic president awarding Planned Parenthood a $1.7 million grant would be nice to see.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211973637

March 21, 2019

Snopes: Do Sens. Warren, Booker, Harris and Sanders Pass Fewer Bills Than Other Senators?

Posting in the Warren group for discussion and reference. to Omaha Steve for posting this in the primaries forum.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/128733336

What's True
Only a fraction of the proposed bills sponsored by Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Kamala Harris (D-CA), and Bernie Sanders ( D-VT) have been passed by Congress.

What's False
This phenomenon is not unique to these four senators (as only a very small fraction of all proposed legislation ends up being passed), and the statistics included in the meme are outdated.

A text meme supposedly showcasing the legislative records of various 2020 Democratic presidential candidates — Elizabeth Warren (MA), Cory Booker (NJ), Kamala Harris (CA), and Bernie Sanders (VT) — circulated on social media in March 2019 along with comments about how these lawmakers were ineffective at their jobs for their failure to pass more than a scant handful of bills:

FULL story here: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/democratic-senators-pass-bills-rate/

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Member since: 2003 before July 6th
Number of posts: 45,066
Latest Discussions»Autumn's Journal