Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumSLOPPY Judge Cannon's Latest Move FINAL STRAW for Prosecutors - Meidas Touch
Will Judge Cannons latest fundamental blunder to have the JURY decide the law that applies and NOT THE JUDGE lead to her REMOVAL from the Trump espionage/obstruction criminal case known as Mar-a-Lago or not?
Michael Popok explains the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals lemon law and how it could be applied here to get her off the case and the case tried before Election Day. - 03/23/2024.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 802 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SLOPPY Judge Cannon's Latest Move FINAL STRAW for Prosecutors - Meidas Touch (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Mar 23
OP
You're right, she's proven to be biased in TFG's favor, should have excused herself or been removed when she was assigned
Rhiannon12866
Mar 24
#2
And if you are an R and with all my best efforts to weigh the scale in your favor fails, what are you going to do to...
usaf-vet
Mar 24
#3
KS Toronado
(17,696 posts)1. Sure hope the 11th Circuit removes her, better yet take her robes away.
She's just the type of person before hearing a case would ask, "Are you a D or R"?
Rhiannon12866
(208,465 posts)2. You're right, she's proven to be biased in TFG's favor, should have excused herself or been removed when she was assigned
To one of the two most important cases TFG is facing.
usaf-vet
(6,322 posts)3. And if you are an R and with all my best efforts to weigh the scale in your favor fails, what are you going to do to...
.....ensure I will never have to work again?
KS Toronado
(17,696 posts)4. Do not understand your hypothetical
usaf-vet
(6,322 posts)5. If we win or lose Cannon wants to know how is she REWARDED after the case is over.
Don't you think we should know if she has been BOUGHT?
usaf-vet
(6,322 posts)6. I believe she has been bought and paid for already!
KS Toronado
(17,696 posts)7. No doubt in my mind she is bought and paid for by an R organization.
Federalist Society is toward the top of the list.
usaf-vet
(6,322 posts)8. Bingo!! Now we are both on the same page! :-) ;-)
Have a great day!
It's time for a second cup of coffee here.
KS Toronado
(17,696 posts)9. Way ahead of you on coffee
MagaSmash
(5,786 posts)10. This is the Moment for Smith to MAKE HIS MOVE!
"Spinning wheel landed on Cannon"? BS. Who chose her for REAL?
usaf-vet
(6,322 posts)11. What is the difference? Let's get on with focusing on GOTV for President Biden.
1. She stays and puts off the trial until after the election.
2. Smith forces her recusal; they have to appoint a new judge, and that delays the trial until after the election.
In both cases, if Trump wins (heaven help us) the trial will not happen.
If Smith forces her into recusal, the positive outcome would be that she would be clearly exposed as a right-leaning judge.