Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWhat Is Actually Radical About Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism Isn’t the Socialism
http://inthesetimes.com/article/18559/saul-alinsky-and-bernies-sanders-vision-of-democracyIt isnt a particularly radical political visionits an unflinching commitment to democracy...The brouhaha over Sanders self-identification as a democratic socialist has largely missed what is truly radical about that identity. Its not the socialism. Sanders has never used the S word with precisionfor him, it seems to be simply a shorthand for robust investment in public services and the common good.
That shorthand has proved remarkably useful, allowing him to distinguish himself from liberals and most Democrats, while pointing out that much of what he calls socialism is already deeply embedded in American society in a variety of popular programs and institutions, most notably in public libraries and parks, in the Social Security and Medicare programs, and in various aspects of the military. The ambitious agenda he has laid out would amount to the largest peacetime expansion of government in modern American history, as the Wall Street Journal has noted. At the first Democratic debate, the former senator from Virginia, Jim Webb, used one of his few speaking opportunities to toss a pail of cold water on Sanders proposals. I dont think the revolutions going to come, he said blandly, and I dont think the Congress is going to pay for a lot of this stuff.
Webb was correct about the odds of Congress passing much of Sanderss agenda for public spending. But he was wrong to conflate that agenda with the revolution Sanders has in mind. What makes Sanders a radical, and what constitutes the essence of his revolution, isnt his commitment to certain spending priorities or a particular economic planits his fierce commitment to democracy.
Change never takes place from the top down, he told his audience at the University of Chicago. It always takes place from the bottom up. It takes place when people by the millions, sometimes over decades and sometimes over centuries, determine that the status quothe world that they see in front of themis not the world that should be, and they come together. And sometimes they get arrested. And sometimes they die in the struggle. And what human history is about is passing that torch from generation to generation to generation.
Though they are very different in their approaches to achieving it, Sanders shares this commitment to a radical version of democracy with Saul Alinsky, the activist and organizer who made Chicago his home and has played an outsized role in our recent national politics. Alinskys book Rules for Radicals, the summary of his organizing philosophy that was published a year before his death in 1972, is particularly notorious among right-wing pundits, and he was often invoked by conservatives in the 2008 and 2012 elections as evidence of Barack Obamas secret radicalism. Obama was, famously, a community organizer in the 1980s for a Chicago-based organization, the Developing Communities Project, inspired by Alinskys strategies. Hillary Clintons ties are even more direct. She was born in Chicago and grew up in a suburb, and she wrote her thesis at Wellesley about Alinsky. In a letter she sent him in 1971, Clinton wrote that the more Ive seen of places like Yale Law School and the people who haunt them, the more convinced I am that we have the serious business and joy of much work ahead. His ghost will no doubt be conjured once again if Clinton wins the Democratic nomination. As with Sanders, though, Alinskys radicalism wasnt a matter of the specific reforms he pushed for, which were about winning incremental and often relatively modest improvements in the lives of the poor and disenfranchised. Rather, he was a radical and a revolutionary because he actually believed in democracy...
more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Is Actually Radical About Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism Isn’t the Socialism (Original Post)
Proserpina
Dec 2015
OP
Yes, you are right.
Proserpina
(2,352 posts)2. this needs more reading!
phantom power
(25,966 posts)3. Also, he doesn't believe in triangulating with wingnuts.
Which, unfortunately, makes him a "radical" with respect to the modern Democratic party.