Post removed

[n2doc]

1. I don't know if it is really any more damaging than before

What it does do is inoculate tRump from damage caused by his lies. If both sides do it, then the voter has to make choices based on other aspects, or just stay home. There is an obvious way out of this, if the Party elders cared to take it.

[EdwardBernays]

6. I think it is

Because the MSM - aside from wingers - hasn't been calling her a liar until the OIG report was released. Like the article says - they've known it for a year, but didn't feel they could SAY it until now. And that story is playing out the same way across the media unlike ever before.

It used to be: people think she's a liar.
Now its: she's a liar.

Big difference.

[saltpoint]

2. She ought to hold a press conference

and answer all questions.

My guess is she won't do that. Which would go a long way toward supporting the claims in the Sun on her untrustworthiness.

I'm aware that Mrs. Clinton has her minions here on this site, but the facts are becoming painfully clear: She's a stinker of a candidate.

[EdwardBernays]

3. Super stinker

Hard to even fathom.

[saltpoint]

5. She still does not have a definitional

theme for the campaign. She did offer "We are stronger together" a short while back, but that sounds like a Hallmark card greeting in addition to meaning absolutely nothing.

[EdwardBernays]

8. Indeed

It's a disaster from the word go.

[saltpoint]

11. And it's such a wasted chance for her politically,

since she is certainly in a position to hire top-drawer writers and advisors. John Kennedy had a classical education and was no slouch at language and vision, but he still wanted a cadre of advisors and writers around him so that his presidency would speak to later generations and not just the law students over at Georgetown. He spoke respectfully and inspirationally to them, too, but his audience was far larger.

There's none of that in Hillary Clinton's two campaigns for the presidency.

[EdwardBernays]

16. Well

Look no further than who she hired as campaign chairman to understand why.

[saltpoint]

17. Sorry to say, yes. Lame campaign crew

generally, in fact. But she must figure they're as good as anybody for tabulating the Wall Street donor checks and the money from WalMart. Plus, they all know how to book lunch for her with Henry Kissinger.

[Plucketeer]

15. Aww Let's cut her some slack

After all, she always TRIES to tell the truth.

[Ichingcarpenter]

4. You know it would be interesting to see how many

papers have slammed her and how many support her actions

I'm seeing papers that endorsed her slamming her for lying

My guess? 4/5 of all papers condemn her actions.

[EdwardBernays]

7. A Google search

Shows basically zero support for her in the news.

[Ichingcarpenter]

12. I've seen a few but basically its the typical excuses

everyone does it, its no big deal, no 'crimes' committed,
witch hunt, she said she made a mistake...... etc.

Those I consider 'positive' spin......

The thing is they are talking and writing about it, before the next primary.

Hey TV news watchers!.......... What are their main stories now?

Any Hillary news discussed?

[EdwardBernays]

14. As always

Hit your local stations up on FB and Twitter etc etc.

The ammo is there and there's MSM precedence.

[Karma13612]

9. Such a shame this couldn't have come out before

Maryland voted.

Too little too late from the Baltimore Sun, but at least we are finally seeing a glimmer of hope that the media might decide to report the news.

[EdwardBernays]

10. Fingers crossed

It impacts in California.

[libodem]

13. Can't stand Jonah Goldberg

But it was an entertaining piece.

Reading him puts a crimp in my progressive credentials.