Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (BigBearJohn) on Sat Apr 23, 2016, 06:26 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Baobab
(4,667 posts)It lowers wages and makes businesses more profitable.
http://commerce.nic.in/wto_sub/Invest/sub_invest-W39.htm
http://www.tilj.org/content/journal/42/num1/Worster55.pdf
http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/19/this-is-how-trump-hotel-workers-live-in-dubai-video/
dchill
(38,610 posts)HRC will not return to the White House. To vote for Clinton is to vote for Trump.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)The more I hear about it the more concerned I get.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)So there will be 3 categories: those that vote for trump, those that stay home, and those that write in Bernie Sanders.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)I'm not sure I'm confident that something healthy would emerge from the chaos though. Then again, I'm certain that Hillary "locks in" the Oligarchy for a long time, which is disastrous.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)that Hillary is a guarantee same old. And they're young enough to want change so bad that they're willing to wreck it.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)Hillary promises business as usual, with minor tweaks here and there.
onenote
(42,830 posts)or disabled, and so on and so forth.
Even worse, they apparently don't give a rat's ass about those whose lives will be irreparably harmed by a Trump presidency.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)onenote
(42,830 posts)for African Americans, immigrants, working poor (he opposes any change in the minimum wage), women (he doesn't support abortion rights and has attacked Planned Parenthood), Muslims and so forth.
What is the basis for your view that Trump, propelled to prominence by the most hateful wing of the Repub party, is really a benign puppy dog? Apart from your own blindness.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)I don't think he's a puppy dog, but I don't think he'll march us to the showers either. Trump has no ideology nor does he have any loyalty to his supporters; he's just pandering. If Trump where to become president (ain't gonna happen) he would never be able to implement any of the radical policies he has promised.
Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #88)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to Name removed (Reply #96)
Post removed
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)If Hillary gets in, you can bet they will do everything they can to make sure another Sanders doesn't come along.
I could never vote for Trump, but I can see how reasonable people would take that gamble.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)the weak spots to make damn sure it doesn't happen again.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)If Hillary gets in, things will be status quo for possibly eight years or longer.
If a republican gets in, it will more than likely be for only one term. The question is how much more damage can they potentially do?
TrueDemVA
(250 posts)I am writing in Bernie if he is not the nominee. I want a future for my children and me and my wife, all of my friends, and everyone else out there. A vote for Hillary will surely be the end of any hope. Sounds bad, but she is just a horrible candidate.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Trump is not establishment. His policy are not all that different from Clinton's on so many issues and decidedly to the left on others. Truman said it best. If given the choice between a real Republican and a Democratic conservative, then the American people just vote for the real Republican.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)in this case that is trump.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)Lot's them at work (mid 20's) are saying there is NO way they will vote for 'her'. Some think trump is making sense (?!) and think he's less corrupted (wallstreet, iraq, etc).
I keep saying he'll be the FIRST to sell out in a NY second ... but even then they're willing to let it burn in order to have some change.
It's interesting from a psychological standpoint: in game theory it's been shown that if people think someone needs to be "punished" that they will even go against their interests to enact it. I think that's some of what we are seeing: they just really despise hrc
BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)Locrian
(4,522 posts)It's a variant of the "no free rider".
First game, everyone has x tokens and and chose to put or not put into a pot. The pot gets multiplied and everyone shares. Obviously you can chose not to chip in - but you still benefit.
First run is blind - and after awhile the return drop as people try to maximize their own by not contributing.
THEN they run it with the ability to see and "penalize" those who don't put in - but it "costs" you to do so.
In the end, everyone participates and the return is higher that the first.
In this case - I think they see hrc is full of lies and deception and "getting away with it" and "winning". Not to mention "her" supporters dismissive/abusive/belitting attitude etc.
I think there is a very real desire to enact a "punishment" even though it will hurt them. In effect - at this stage it's an emotional reasoning. Not logical. Not sure if there is time / rebuilding that can change that.
840high
(17,196 posts)slogan is anyone but Hillary.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)On both sides of the aisle. I would wager there's a majority of America that wants her punished, if we consider her negative numbers.
lostnfound
(16,200 posts)They don't like trump's racism and xenophobia but maybe they think he is going to shake up status quo
brewens
(13,657 posts)to deal with. Maybe he won't be pushed around. I could also see him going full Bullworth if approached with something too unethical.
I have a feeling he's full of shit on some of the stuff he's been playing the half-wits with anyway.
I really still don't think he wants to be president. I'm not all that confident about anything I said above, I'd just hope he'd try and be a good president. I'll still vote for Hillary I suppose if she is nominated.
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
Locrian
(4,522 posts)HRC and 'her' supporters are a classic example of short term gains / fix it later
they are totally unprepared that people are past the tipping point and will NOT come 'back to the fold'
The people I talk to are not joking.... they at a MIN will not vote. Most say they are voting for trump if Bernie is not in the GE
Trump is already turning to be less controversial - and he has a shit ton of legitimate ammunition to go after HRC
dana_b
(11,546 posts)maybe Jill or even writing Bernie's name in? Trump is just the antithesis of Bernie
Response to dana_b (Reply #10)
CompanyFirstSergeant This message was self-deleted by its author.
jillan
(39,451 posts)a clearer picture.
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
BigBearJohn This message was self-deleted by its author.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)But she's entirely too compromised by entrenched interests and her own bank account to be sincere about those things.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)is people assume you are saying anything to get elected.
djean111
(14,255 posts)She is known for pandering and changing to fit the polls and focus groups.
There is no longer any there, there, when it comes to Hillary's campaign or platform. We can just go by deeds and the past. Which - not good.
I am hearing the same thing, by the way.
Response to BigBearJohn (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
grasswire
(50,130 posts)They won't fall for it. And shouldn't.
swilton
(5,069 posts)is worse than a first Trump term....
Yes regularly listen to Chomsky, TYT, - I can never see that woman in the oval office....Her election not only represents Billary @ 3, it validates and perpetuates DNC and Democratic Party corruption.
TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)If the democrats can take the house and senate, they can obstruct, just like the republicans have for the last eight years.
All in it together
(275 posts)Especially if it isn't Bernie.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)However, I certainly hope the stupidity is not rampant. Scary shit though. The question is why?
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Maybe they are of the opinion that with Trump elected the Democrats will actually have to be an opposition Party. If Hillary is elected the establishment Dems will support whatever she proposes (including Republican approved policies). Maybe they would rather fight a Republican (with Democratic allies) from getting his policies passed than get stabbed in the back by the Democrats and no ally to help them fight it?
inchhigh
(384 posts)My biggest fear is that if Billary gets in there will be Zero opposition from the left. She will push these awful corporate friendly reforms (like either privatizing social security or dumping the trust fund into the stock market) and the people who SHOULD be fighting that will be cheering her on, somehow believing she is protecting us from something worse.
I wonder sometimes if the whole impeachment crap wasn't a con game from the right, suckering us into supporting a guy that was really not trying to help us because the big bad republicans were just so obviously unfair to him.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)Which shows how upside down our Party has become.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)I would never, ever consider placing my vote for a Puke.
Nor for a Clinton...I'll write in, if needed, someone I adore and is our last hope for true change.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)I don't think it helps them to see reason when pundits comedians and politicians are calling them stupid, unreasonable and childish.
LyndaG
(683 posts)Senator Sanders is nothing like Trump.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She is a conservative whom no one trusts
LyndaG
(683 posts)When they were both in the Senate, they voted the same way 93 percent of the time. That's close enough for me.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)important than the health of the citizens. And voting with Bernie on a new name for a post office is not good enough for me
LyndaG
(683 posts)Trump has said women who have abortions should be punished.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)You went to college, got a degree, are $100,000 in debt and still can't find a job that'll get you out of your parents' basement?
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)I understand the frustration very well! I am terrified of Cruz. Sort of terrified of the DNC to be honest!
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Could it be anti-trade-agreements or bust?
I don't see Trump doing a thing about the environment. But then I don't see Hillary doing anything adequate about it either.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)Even if he were elected, I would not be at all surprised if there was a military against him. Yes, I think the Establishment would go that far.
shanti
(21,675 posts)the people who would be behind him, i.e., the puppet masters. all the old neocons would be propping him up, and the *ush administration would continue behind the scenes. doubt he'd want another term, though.
i still don't trust hill/bill any farther than i could throw them.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)And he just shifted gears into general election mode, with a change of persona. What a mess it will be.
noamnety
(20,234 posts)similar to having to burn the village in order to save it.
Trump would be a one termer, and hopefully Hillary would get the message that it's never going to happen for her, and she would just stop running, and the second term would be a more progressive democrat, and help move the party in the correct direction. 4 years of libertarianism with a dose of racism added in, followed by potentially 4 years of lefty policies.
Hillary on the other hand could possibly be a two termer of neoliberalism- or if one term, she would be replaced by a republican anyway. And some certainly believe the Clinton policies have promoted racism. So 8 years of right wing policies and some racism either way.
I disagree with some here who think it's about hating her as an individual. I'm sure that's true for some voters, but I really think it has more to do with hating corporate control of our country and understanding that the 1% are really having control of ALL aspects of our world.
Also I think there's some confusion as to Trump's sincerity vs, pandering to the right for votes - he might be a democrat running as a republican, while hillary's a ... well, let's just say a right-of-center politician ... running as a democrat.
Ino
(3,366 posts)Plus, Congress starts heading in the direction opposite the President's party. Obama started out with both houses Democratic (which he squandered). Two years later, we lost the House. Then we lost the Senate.
So if a Repuke is elected, chances are Dems will regain Congress in short order.
Hillary will not get primaried. If she's elected, there will not be a chance of another Dem in the WH for 8 years. But if a Repuke is elected, there is another chance in 4 years, and hopefully Hillary will have given up or will have little backing for a 3rd try.
Many who would rather vote for Trump than Hillary are not doing it because they like Trump, or to punish Hillary by voting against their own interests, but are thinking ahead 2 years, and 4 years -- how to turn Congress ASAP, how to get another chance for a real Progressive President ASAP.
As for the SCOTUS argument, Obama has neutralized it. He chose someone SO CONSERVATIVE that Repukes are rethinking their vow to not vote for anyone he nominates. Hillary would do the same, in order to "get things done" -- and she has ZERO intention of overturning Citizens United, especially before she needs that $$$ for her second term GE campaign. Anyone she chooses will be corporate-friendly. And seeing as how she's already indicated she's willing to compromise on abortion, I doubt that would be a litmus test either.
As noamnety said, if a Repuke is installed, the Dems will function as a real opposition party, rather than Hillary's collection of bought/bribed/bullied cohorts. I've heard it said a Repuke could never tamper with Social Security or the like -- it would take a DEMOCRAT to do that. It would take a Hillary.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Hillary will not serve a full term, IMO, if she is elected. Her health will become a factor, or the corruption will force her out.
Ino
(3,366 posts)There are things to look forward to should she get installed.
sandpan
(34 posts)I am a life-long democrat. If Bernie does not win the democratic nomination, I will be voting for Trump.
mahina
(17,751 posts)What's your reasoning if I may ask?
Response to mahina (Reply #47)
Post removed
onenote
(42,830 posts)Muslims and all the other groups that will be irreparably harmed or endangered by a Trump presidency.
Why are you here?
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)Latinos, Muslims, and other groups would be persecuted under a Trump presidency is horseshit, and even racist. Its a scare tactic, and an insilult ro most peoples intellegence.
deepestblue
(349 posts)Trump will win the GE in a landslide, unless he is facing Sanders in which case Trump will lose in a landslide.
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)Response to deepestblue (Reply #39)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ReasonableToo
(505 posts)Be same set of staff/cabinet: whomever Bill wants.
If someone is going to throw away a vote, write-in or Stein would make more of a statement than Trump. That would be preferable to staying home too.
Note: I'm not advocating for not supporting nominee. Just what to do if they have already decided to not vote for nominee.
Joob
(1,065 posts)If Bernie doesn't win, then make effort to truly make a liberal party
That sends a better message
greymouse
(872 posts)ask them to write in.
My state does and that's what I plan to do. If it didn't, I am so angry at Clinton, who is not only corrupt and incompetent, but blocking votes from Sanders voters with her dirty tricks politics, that although I had planned to vote Green to help the Greens stay on the ballot, the thought of voting for Trump crossed my mind.
If Bernie is not the nominee and enough people write him in, the election could wind up with the electoral college really deciding.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)but I think he is, oddly enough, less motivated by money than Clinton. He has has amassed and lost fortunes, and is more motivated by his own vanity and feelings of prestige he gets from his admirers. In some instances, I could imagine someone saying to him "This guy over here says you can't get our country off of fossil fuels, or she told me you can't get universal healthcare." And he might make the hardest stab at it anyone ever has, just out of his own ludicrous vanity.
vt_native
(484 posts)Just can't...
Maybe write in Bernie,vote Green, or Trump, even.
I suspect many feel this way.
Flame on!
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)Anti-establishment voters aren't going to come out for an uber-establishment candidate, they're going to flock to another anti-establishment candidate.
Even if that candidate is Trump.
I found this site in frustration after seeing my neighbors (normally Democratic voters) do just that in the SC open primary.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)and will leave social security alone.
His bluster is mainly that. Imo, they could do far worse.
Gman
(24,780 posts)You made that shit up. Admit it.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)johnp3907
(3,735 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Hillary is worst because we know what she will do.
stopbush
(24,398 posts)that Sen Sanders and his campaign have been throwing out there about Hillary.
Hell, if I was a naif to politics, I might believe some of that crap as well. Not everybody gets that Sanders saying Hillary is unqualified is just primary rhetoric along the lines of Trump "playing a role." Some Sanders supporters actually take the Senator at his word, rather than seeing the ploy for what it is - a short-term strategy to win a few votes.
The rest of us realize that were Sanders to win the nomination the first person he would call on to campaign for him would be Hillary, followed by Obama. That's just smart politics.
elias7
(4,036 posts)Remember it was Hillary who started negative against Bernie... She and Chelsea mischaracterized his healthcare position.
But don't put this on Bernie. This stuff was out there before he came along. If you want to keep sowing the seeds of intraparty discord, keep up the condescending attitude towards Bernie supporters.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I will not act on alerts sent by non members of our group. I will send you the alert.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,976 posts)KPN
(15,677 posts)Fight's on!
They don't get out much.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)The sense of entitlement borders on the pathological
Autumn
(45,120 posts)else could they get their daily requirement of vitamin Outrage
onenote
(42,830 posts)RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)my 19 y/o and his friends are the same. He's never heard the term "lesser of two evils" so there's been a lot of discussion around here.
deepestblue
(349 posts)Trump will most definitely win in an utter landslide unless he is facing Sanders in which case Trump may only win in the deep south.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Trump will most likely win...
And either way America will have a President that the majority distrust and dislike.
Response to BigBearJohn (Original post)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)they are in their late 20's and I don't consider them informed voters, Heck it took me a long time to talk them into voting for Sanders instead of Trump to begin with, Nothing will make them vote for Clinton, taht ship has sailed they don't want 4 years of impeachment. The best I am hoping is them not voting.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Anyone who votes for Trump wants Trump and all the Republicans will give them.
It is that simple.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Contrary1
(12,629 posts)White college kids are having a sad, so fuck African Americans, Latinos, LGBT, etc., etc.:
The definition of privilege.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1107113533
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)We are fighting privilidge, corruption, lie-based wars and the disgusting prevalence of corporate influence in our political system!
No one believes that this movement is "privilidged" --not even the Hillary supporters who try to spread that slop.
Nice try though.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and many Independents cannot stand Hillary. She polls terribly with Indies. Where exactly does everyone think those Indies will go?
Republicans would swim across shark-infested waters to vote against Hillary, she loses the majority of Indies and 25 percent of Dems won't vote for her.
What a great recipe for disaster!
What does Hillary care though what her numbers are? She's been stealing her way across these primaries, she'll do it again in the GE.