Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumNed_Devine
(3,146 posts)They're going to keep trotting out the same old tired attacks on him and all of us. We need to be the ones that shut them all up and show the world we mean business!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Eww.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Ha ha! Made some dumbass alert-stalker look!
Great take, Spitfire!
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)The people know who stands for them! Go Bernie!!!
Lorien
(31,935 posts)And the DU Hillary club will block you from their group which you never post in!
I'm still waiting to see one of her equally enthusiastic rallies. Even Obama's rallies never came close to the level of energy and enthusiasm that Bernie's inspire! He truly is making history!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)Lorien
(31,935 posts)I guess I'll need a shower now.
Gene Debs
(582 posts)rhetoric doesn't match her record. I got blocked.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)And they do not care if you posted by accident.
pocoloco
(3,180 posts)Probably not Carlos Danger either.
cui bono
(19,926 posts).
Gene Debs
(582 posts)just an echo chamber? A self-reinforcing bubble of the type that Fox News watchers typically live in?
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)The People's Republic of Hillary -the slightest whiff of criticism of The Chosen One and WHAM! they get you outta there.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)clicked a link and did not "Properly" inspect the title/group. My bad. Does anyone know how many have been blocked from the Bernie Group?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)Cartoonist
(7,320 posts)I didn't even know I was in their group. I was responding to something on the main page. I thought I was just joining in the conversation.
Instoblock!
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)I was responding to something equally insulting and naturally they kept that but I got spanked. irony. I stood up for someone else who clearly wasn't the liar and I got it. do'h. okay fine clearly Hillary does not want any votes. just wants to make it look good.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)I wouldn't have been thrilled about it, but I would voted for the lesser of evils again. But since her supporters have been so vile and arrogant this entire primary, constantly demanding that we all fall in line and *never* actually making a decent case for their candidate based on the issue, I doubt that I could hold my nose again. That kind of contempt and arrogance shouldn't be rewarded.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)I won't reward anyone for essentially cheating and behaving contemptuously toward a democratic process. It doesn't bode well for what type of leadership we would be in for.
I was looking this morning and one of the chosen few was telling their followers that they could still K and R a hidden post "by the rules". I looked at the post and I'm not sure how it got hidden, it was pro HRC and basically said that all these pro HRC pundits can't be wrong because there are great people. I mean easy enough to dispute if you what to take the time, so it begs the question "why was it hidden?" Did they get a jury of Bernie supporters that did a "tit for tat"? I'd like to think that we are not like that. but sometimes I wonder if we don't have a few. Bernie takes the high road, it's one of the reasons I've supported him for years. So back to the point. whats going on with the HRC supporters here? Are they a bunch of paid shills and getting posts hidden by their own to look like a martyr? Am I going off the deep end? It just seems like there is some people just can't see the forest because of the trees in the way...
Playinghardball
(11,665 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)elusive 2:1 ratio of blocked members to subscribers.
It's approximately 425 blocks to 260 members now, give or take.
A nice metaphor for Clinton's sense of inclusiveness, maybe.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Banning with a 2:1 ratio within the democrat community and they think they can survive a general election? What a sick joke. They should all be banned from our party for trying to tank the national election with their selfish, myopic delusions of grandeur. They remind me of Frank Burns from M.A.S.H.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)They do not take well to any criticism of the Anointed One.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)and the next day I received a phone call from the chief whip. Only then did I realise that total sycophancy is considered a rather lukewarm support these days."
-- Gerald Kaufman MP, 1997
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)Seems to be happening to others as well, judging from the MSNBC comments.
Desperate people resorting to desperate measures.
It is truly sickening.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)The 15,000 is just in the main auditorium. The overflow had about 5,000. The lines were around the block. There were at least two lines 3 blocks long. There was a late start because it's very hard to seat 20,000 people quickly.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)return. It's clear that the need for and dishing out of cash has not been a problem up until now. She's had plenty of it...but that was from when she was "inevitable" and Sanders was "a disheveled old man". LOL
Who could have guessed that when he said no politics as usual, he was already doing it...attack me and I get more money and votes. That's standing the status quo on its proverbial head.
Plan B?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)Response to Playinghardball (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Don't you remember that post? Big crowds are a problem, small crowds are much better. For some reason.
.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Because it's Sofa King Wonderful
Woohoo, Baby, Feel the Bern!
TexasBushwhacker
(20,209 posts)Response to TexasBushwhacker (Reply #40)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.