Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:33 PM Apr 2015

old white guy

This discussion thread was locked by NYC_SKP (a host of the Populist Reform of the Democratic Party group).

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
old white guy (Original Post) rbnyc Apr 2015 OP
Not sure what you're saying here. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #1
it speaks to irony. /nt Dragonfli Apr 2015 #2
Is that when you let an iron.... daleanime Apr 2015 #19
No that is what happens when I try to operate an iron with my fumbling hands (or a burned shirt) Dragonfli Apr 2015 #21
The irony BainsBane Apr 2015 #24
I don't equate Sanders with white male supremacy, I equate the other two with it Dragonfli Apr 2015 #26
You equate two of the most radically different, welcome changes in american politics in years F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #33
They support the status quo of white male supremecy, so yeah Dragonfli Apr 2015 #36
No, you're ignoring the point here. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #38
No, I see them Quite clearly, and all they stand for Dragonfli Apr 2015 #40
You clearly don't. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #41
Yes, but irony based in great part on skin color, gender and age. merrily Apr 2015 #45
I wouldn't have gone that way either, but I do understand what is being said Dragonfli Apr 2015 #46
I understand the objective, but, again, I would not have gone that way. merrily Apr 2015 #47
It means quite simply TM99 Apr 2015 #4
thanks rbnyc Apr 2015 #5
Using literary devices on DU is no longer the useful way of illustrating Zorra Apr 2015 #20
Thanks, I thought I was going crazy. rbnyc Apr 2015 #22
+1 Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #8
I would like to think BainsBane Apr 2015 #23
From what I've seen F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #37
Bingo! Scuba Apr 2015 #3
Nice reminder Warpy Apr 2015 #6
No, I went back and thought about this some more. This doesn't just feel wrong. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #7
Excellent post AuntPatsy Apr 2015 #10
+1 daleanime Apr 2015 #16
You seem happy to ignore and diminish Bernie's accomplishments nxylas Apr 2015 #42
Take a look through my posts. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #43
ah, well now... if this one does not turn me right off, and turn my back. maybe i will step out seabeyond Apr 2015 #9
Don't bail out based on one idiotic post on a web forum. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #11
ty. it made me so angry, the different insults in it. i see it has nothing to do with sanders. seabeyond Apr 2015 #18
I don't support this kind of talk. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #12
It's not a fued rbnyc Apr 2015 #14
Good luck I don't think DU can handle this kind of talk. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #15
I think we shouldn't be afraid to talk about it. rbnyc Apr 2015 #25
A lot of people voted for George Bush because he wore cowboy boots and prayed to Jesus. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #27
Then say that. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #39
Too idiotic and offensive to have come from Sander's campaign. JTFrog Apr 2015 #13
This is really stupid, and I really don't think Sanders would approve. cyberswede Apr 2015 #17
I vote to leave it up. Katashi_itto Apr 2015 #28
narcissists BainsBane Apr 2015 #30
Lol! So predictable. Katashi_itto Apr 2015 #31
Yes, if you can predict one thing BainsBane Apr 2015 #32
Lol I refer you to #31 Katashi_itto Apr 2015 #34
"My issues" BainsBane Apr 2015 #35
"Your issues" F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #44
Please delete this post. Other members are using it smokey nj Apr 2015 #29
Locking this post on the grounds that it can be taken the wrong way, doesn't advance the cause. SRY NYC_SKP Apr 2015 #48

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
1. Not sure what you're saying here.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 08:54 PM
Apr 2015

And I don't think I like it.

Actually, I know I don't.

Yuck.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
2. it speaks to irony. /nt
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 09:02 PM
Apr 2015

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
19. Is that when you let an iron....
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:18 AM
Apr 2015

fall on your head?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
21. No that is what happens when I try to operate an iron with my fumbling hands (or a burned shirt)
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:35 AM
Apr 2015

i·ro·ny
ˈīrənē/

noun
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.

"“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
"that note of irony in her voice"
antonyms: sincerity

a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects and is often amusing as a result.
plural noun: ironies
"the irony is that I thought he could help me"
synonyms: paradox, incongruity, incongruousness
"the irony of the situation"

a literary technique, originally used in Greek tragedy, by which the full significance of a character's words or actions are clear to the audience or reader although unknown to the character.
noun: dramatic irony

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
24. The irony
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:44 AM
Apr 2015

is that people who pretend to be leftists condone shit like this. The irony is that you all think this is acceptable. It confirms my sense that a lot of the angst about the current Democratic party is in fact reactionary rather than progressive. It tells me that some here have far to much in common with the GOP.

If you all want to equate supporting Sanders with white male supremacy, you can count most of America out. Of course, counting most of the population out is exactly what this meme is meant to convey.


Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. I don't equate Sanders with white male supremacy, I equate the other two with it
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:55 AM
Apr 2015

That is the irony.

Sorry you don't understand what the word means. Maybe the poster was trying to push for "white male supremacy", but I didn't think so and I still don't. You should read more books, these things are not hard to understand, I have noticed such devices are lost on the young twitter minded literalists that have never been exposed to literature.

I think it's the way education works now as opposed to ancient times when I studied.
It is a shame people are offended by ironic statements, but that is the new world we live in.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
33. You equate two of the most radically different, welcome changes in american politics in years
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:28 AM
Apr 2015
with white supremacy?

Oh yeah. Not everyone welcomes change.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
36. They support the status quo of white male supremecy, so yeah
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:37 AM
Apr 2015

There are plenty of non white males that keep the supremacy going, those are two such individuals.

Sorry, looks can be deceiving, I don't support based on looks. Should I adore Palin as well?

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
38. No, you're ignoring the point here.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:43 AM
Apr 2015

That you refuse to recognize that they did good at all, and that that was a victory for those millions affected by them, is an insult to those people, and their life experiences. This meme does exactly that: it insults every one of those people.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
40. No, I see them Quite clearly, and all they stand for
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:52 AM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12774832

I do not have the luxury of wealth to see this as a team sport where we don't matter because we are poor, but it's OK because our leaders are fabulous looking supporters of the status quo and look great on the trading cards and posters.

I don't care if it were a green hermaphroditic dwarf that fought for people that were continually being impoverished and in some cases gunned down, I would support that green dwarf.

I also don't care if a candidate looks like me and has a nice smile but sells my future out to wall street, that one will not get my support.


Sorry to disappoint.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
41. You clearly don't.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:57 AM
Apr 2015

Take a look at this thread again. Goodnight.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
45. Yes, but irony based in great part on skin color, gender and age.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:24 AM
Apr 2015

I am all for freedom of speech and image, but I would not have gone this way

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
46. I wouldn't have gone that way either, but I do understand what is being said
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:30 AM
Apr 2015

Which appears to place me in the minority.

I could pretend I don't understand it, and provide the proper outrage over something unintended, but I have trouble playing dumb.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
47. I understand the objective, but, again, I would not have gone that way.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:37 AM
Apr 2015
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
4. It means quite simply
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 10:16 PM
Apr 2015

that just because someone is black or a woman, it does not mean that they stand with the people against corporate dominance of our entire politico-economic system.

And just because someone is an old white guy doesn't mean that he is a corporate tool of the oligarchs.

Then you know, there is the irony.

rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
5. thanks
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 10:31 PM
Apr 2015

I'm deeply surprised that wasn't clear. Maybe I'm out of touch.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
20. Using literary devices on DU is no longer the useful way of illustrating
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:24 AM
Apr 2015

a point that it once was here.

You are out of touch, my dear rbnyc, and this is a very good thing for you, considering we now live in a burgeoning idiocracy.

rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
22. Thanks, I thought I was going crazy.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:37 AM
Apr 2015

You know, I already signed up to volunteer for his campaign and I contributed money. I'm not going to take it back because someone thinks Bernie would not approve of my meme. I'm in. It looks like some folks think there's no room for the likes of me, carelessly reflecting on how ironic it is, after a life of fighting for access for the disenfranchised, that the prospective first female president turns out to be the establishment candidate. And I have been honestly uncertain tonight whether I am just completely dense or whether some folks have no sense of humor. But no matter, we should probably move on because we are going to all have to work together.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
8. +1
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:27 PM
Apr 2015

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
23. I would like to think
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:37 AM
Apr 2015

Sanders would tell the people who think like this to fuck off back to the nineteenth century where they came from. At least I hope so. Shit like this only hurts Sanders.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
37. From what I've seen
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:39 AM
Apr 2015

He's been fully supportive of all of these issues. He may not be overly vocal about him, but he is vocal about just about everything, if that makes sense. For an older, straight, white male? He's pretty good. He's got excellent voting records--better than most Dems, I think. I think he genuinely listens to people, and I can't imagine he hasn't heard the concerns of the minority communities, even if he does not live their experiences. He cares for humanity, and it's not an exclusive humanity like too many often are. I hope that as the race heats up, he doesn't focus exclusively on economic class issues as a campaign issues. Social class problems are going to need to be front and center--this needs to be a worker's movement. My concern is that he's going to very quickly fall prey to the "God bless America" patriotic nationalistic god-loving crap that's expected of the president. It's a relatively minor issue, but then again, with people actively trying to instill a patriarchal theocracy, maybe it isn't. My dream is for him to come out as an atheist (after he's the president, of course :evilgrin .

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
3. Bingo!
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 09:42 PM
Apr 2015

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
6. Nice reminder
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 10:40 PM
Apr 2015

FDR was an old white guy with a huge amount of inherited money and everybody thought he'd be nearly as bad as Hoover had been, making sure his class held onto all the money they'd stolen and the boat didn't get rocked too hard.

They were surprised, too.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
7. No, I went back and thought about this some more. This doesn't just feel wrong.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:24 PM
Apr 2015

It very much is.

Here's why.

Both of those on the left have challenged power in a way that Bernie Sanders never has, or ever could, no disrespect to him. They have pushed back against institutions and power structures that have been in place for centuries and millennia. To do so is no easy task, no matter how privileged a background they came from. That has had real and positive effects on millions in this country.

If you think that becoming the first black president in a nation whose history is rife with racial horrors, a genocide, and an enslavement of an entire people is not standing with the people against entrenched power, think again. That was, is, and always will be a triumph of the people in this nation, and it takes courage to do so. He has fought with stunning calm against one of the worst threads of history in this country despite the intense, blatant, and direct hatred thrown his way.

If you think that her positions of power have not inspired millions of girls in this country, than you are very wrong. Clinton's accomplishments (and that they are, like her or not) have shown so many that there can be strong women. She has fought harder for women than the vast majority of men in our government, and that, to me, is more than just something. She has challenged a multi-thousand year old beast that still refuses to die, and I fully support that.

For all my criticisms of those two politicians, I refuse to ignore or diminish those things. You can argue that their policies have made these same things they fought against worse--I would not disagree. But that was a stand with the people, for the people, by the people, and it can not and should not be taken away from the people. This meme is theft of those accomplishments.

AuntPatsy

(9,904 posts)
10. Excellent post
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:55 PM
Apr 2015

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
16. +1
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:09 AM
Apr 2015

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
42. You seem happy to ignore and diminish Bernie's accomplishments
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:06 AM
Apr 2015

Yes, the symbolic value of a black or woman president is huge, even if they are just tools of the 1%. But a lifetime of fighting for working people shouldn't be ignored just because the person doing the fighting wouldn't make history if he became president.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
43. Take a look through my posts.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:14 AM
Apr 2015

You'll find I don't ignore those accomplishments. In fact, I would say he's done more in his position to help solve these tough issues, even if the number affected by his actions may be fewer. But that's not the point. That meme did not reflect the lived experiences of millions of people in something that affects them deeply and personally--not just symbollically!-- and not only did it not reflect it, it did so in a particularly insulting way.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
9. ah, well now... if this one does not turn me right off, and turn my back. maybe i will step out
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:32 PM
Apr 2015

of sanders campaign if this is how it is going to look. maybe i do not belong.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
11. Don't bail out based on one idiotic post on a web forum.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:56 PM
Apr 2015

It's not like this comes from Bernie Sanders or something.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. ty. it made me so angry, the different insults in it. i see it has nothing to do with sanders.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:18 AM
Apr 2015

it is still quite insulting to many in the democratic party.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
12. I don't support this kind of talk.
Wed Apr 29, 2015, 11:59 PM
Apr 2015

For one thing it's extremely divisive.

It's going to hurt people's feelings.

It's insensitive.

The racial and gender feud angle is just not a good one.

There might be a point, buried in there somewhere. But this graphic is not a good way to approach it.

rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
14. It's not a fued
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:03 AM
Apr 2015

It's just straight-up irony.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
15. Good luck I don't think DU can handle this kind of talk.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:06 AM
Apr 2015

I agree Bernie stands for the interests of the working class, women included, people of color included as well.

But the framing of the issue in terms of the race and gender of the candidate... seems like a bad idea to me. Good luck

rbnyc

(17,045 posts)
25. I think we shouldn't be afraid to talk about it.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:45 AM
Apr 2015

The issue exists. And for some, the symbolic victory for people who have traditionally been underrepresented is so important that they are willing to give up major ground on issues that are directly relevant to the empowerment of those same groups.

Really, I've been an activist my whole life, and I think back to my younger years, marching for choice and refusing to use the pronoun "he" to indicate either gender, and I think how surprised I would have been to find that someday there would be a viable Democratic presidential contender and I would not be able to support her because she would actually be the establishment candidate.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
27. A lot of people voted for George Bush because he wore cowboy boots and prayed to Jesus.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:58 AM
Apr 2015

Identity means a lot in marketing.

You might even be right on the point that you're making.

Bernie stands for the oppressed. President Obama and Hillary maybe don't. They stand with Wall Street. I get that. But the way it's presented seems to be riling up some anger.

I don't know if you've seen this?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6593320




F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
39. Then say that.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:48 AM
Apr 2015
And for some, the symbolic victory for people who have traditionally been underrepresented is so important that they are willing to give up major ground on issues that are directly relevant to the empowerment of those same groups.

But you didn't. You refused to acknowledge those still huge symbolic victories--those symbolic victories, by the way, have been more than just symbolic for those minorities. They have had real effects on real people. You went for the easy meme on a very complicated issue.
 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
13. Too idiotic and offensive to have come from Sander's campaign.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:02 AM
Apr 2015

Not doing this group any favors with this baloney.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
17. This is really stupid, and I really don't think Sanders would approve.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:14 AM
Apr 2015

...and it's a crappy photoshop job, to boot.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
28. I vote to leave it up.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:13 AM
Apr 2015

Yes it has nothing to do with Saunders, HOWEVER:

It drives a certain narcissist on DU crazy.

So my vote is to leave it up.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
30. narcissists
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:25 AM
Apr 2015

meaning not white men, especially the not white men who can't write four figure checks at the drop of a hat. Among those "narcissists" are also white men who care about equal rights and inclusion. It's a good way to alienate people who might otherwise support Sanders, and it's hard for me to comprehend that anyone would think it could have anything other than a negative effect on his campaign, unless the demographics being appealed to are white supremacists and MRAs.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
31. Lol! So predictable.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:27 AM
Apr 2015

It's immediately about "your Issues"

Instead of Occam's razor.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
32. Yes, if you can predict one thing
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:28 AM
Apr 2015

It is that I will ALWAYS stand up against bigotry. That is key to being a leftist.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
34. Lol I refer you to #31
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:29 AM
Apr 2015

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
35. "My issues"
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:37 AM
Apr 2015

Yes, how awful of me to concern myself with the civil rights of the majority rather than the power and ego of a privileged minority.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
44. "Your issues"
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:16 AM
Apr 2015

You either have no clue how patronizing and sexist that sounds, which is pathetic, or you do, in which case you need to be off this site. Which is it?

smokey nj

(43,853 posts)
29. Please delete this post. Other members are using it
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:21 AM
Apr 2015

to smear Bernie and the people who support him. Bernie has an impeccable record on civil rights and social justice, he doesn't deserve that.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
48. Locking this post on the grounds that it can be taken the wrong way, doesn't advance the cause. SRY
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 02:54 AM
Apr 2015

If other hosts want to undo the action we will have that discussion, and you are welcome, of course, to send any of us a PM.

I don't think it was posted with bad intentions, and there is no reflection on your DU record as a result of the lock the way there would be with a jury-hidden reply.

You are not blocked from the group, there are no hard feeling.

Unfortunately, your image has become an unhelpful and divisive thing and we don't need that, right?

PS, if you prefer to self-delete and we are on at the same time, I'm happy to unlock and let you self-delete.

Best regards,

NYC_SKP

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Populist Reform of the Democratic Party»old white guy