2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders will be 75 years old in January 2017
The average life expectancy for a male in the United States is 76 years. For this reason, his health is a legitimate issue that should be discussed.
Hillary Clinton already released her medical records earlier this year and she's considered to be a very healthy individual. The average life expectancy for a female in the United States is 81 years. Hillary will be 69 years old in January 2017.
Bernie Sanders has yet to release his medical records and news came out today that he just had hernia surgery which nobody was aware of until last-minute.
Bernie will need to release his medical records so voters can have the full picture.
Some will consider this topic to be divisive, but it's a legitimate topic of discussion just as people had legitimate concerns about John McCain's health in 2008.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)I support him and if he gets the nomination I assume his running mate will be both younger and highly qualified.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I trust him to chose a VP that will be more than qualified to take over if worst comes to worse. That is what the VP is for.
Crystalite
(164 posts)Saddened and surprised, even knowing that it's a bitter season.
Wow.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)have nothing better to do than go negative and some Hillary supporters have nothing better to do than rec crap and hope it sticks.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)DJ13
(23,671 posts)So I guess you think she should be required to release her medical records as well?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Actually, he's 6 years older.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)With reports that her assistant, Huma Abedin, has expressed her view that Hillary has started becoming more forgetful over the last few years, I doubt Hillary released any records pertaining to that health issue.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Wishful thinking, DJ13? Or have you forgotten that she kicked GOP butt for 11 hours and looked fresh as a daisy afterward while Trey Gowdy, 17 yrs her junior, looked cooked.
You anti-Hillary people really need to try harder.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)brought up the health issue. If Hillary's supporters can bring up Sander's age, then it is perfectly legitimate to question Clinton's health also. And the hernia operation <yawn> . That is no big deal.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)need guidance and she did have trouble recalling her trip to Bosnia. Blamed it on sleep deprivation BTW. There might be more to her health issues we may not know.....
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Hillary is a spring chicken!
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)They need to be considered when selecting a nominee. We need the best candidate to make sure we win this thing.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)And several other presidents had notable health issues... all elected with them.
As far as age, there is no issue here.
Age is a protected class against discrimination. Period.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Of course we have had good Presidents with health and age issues. My point is many voters consider old age and bad health a liability and might affect their vote. We cannot risk electing a candidate that has the appearance of being weak and feeble and elderly and might run out of gas in a lengthy grueling general election campaign.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Many voters consider sex or race a legitimate issue for voting... That doesn't make it right. And it's not something that should be tolerated.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)If we want to win the general election we need to consider all factors... even if we think they are inappropriate.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Commander in Chief"? Really? Because, everything I know to be wrong and right says that would be extremely offensive. Just as offensive as Hillary supporters raising Sanders age. If one is wrong, both are wrong, for the same damn reason. And you know. Stop being an apologist.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)However I think she has done a good job of convincing many she is one tough lady and ready to be Commander in Chief on day one.
But clearly that is an issue and should be discussed. I have no problem with that and I suspect Hillary wouldnt either.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)I dont get it.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)The discussion could be.. "I wonder how voters in the general will react to a woman running for president given the mentality that many think women might not have the cojones to pull the trigger when necessary as Commander in Chief."
That's a legitimate discussion. We as progressives don't believe it but many voters might. So the discussion would be how Hillary can deal with that.
This is a political discussion board to discuss relevant issues.. all relevant issues.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)I thought Democrats were against things like ageism, sexism, racism...
Really offensive OP. A new low.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)regionalism, for example
I have always hated the reference to McCain as "gramps" - I find it extremely offensive.
The bashing of the South here is equally offensive.
Yep - you can find all types of bigotry right here. Not sure why some forms are ban-worthy and others accepted. Makes not a lot of sense to me.
oh well . . .
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Because you yourself engaged in ageism when it came to McCain. Advice you gave someone's mom on why they shouldn't vote for McCain (and he was younger then than Bernie is now):
You seemed to think that was a legitimate issue back then.
Me, I have no problem with either of our candidates ages.
doc03
(35,332 posts)was pretty much out of it and Nancy was running things.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I don't believe Reagan was healthy enough to be President.
doc03
(35,332 posts)and forget what I did yesterday sometimes. Look how Obama has aged over the last 6 years.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Maybe sanders will release his before long.
DavidDvorkin
(19,475 posts)At Sanders's age, it's much greater.
A 75-year-old man in the US has a life expectancy of another 11 years.
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Lans
(66 posts)Bernie has 6 more years of experience not voting for decisions like the Iraq War
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)dsc
(52,161 posts)what is relevant is the life expectancy of a male age 75 and a female age 69. For males age 75 it is 10.9 years, while for females age 69 it is 17.1. Life expectancy is greatly lowered by people dying young and that happens more often in males. Once a person hasn't died young then the life expectancy (in total) is quite higher.
Thanks for the clarification.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)It hard being a hater.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I expect that Bernie (his campaign and physician/s) will release his "fit-as-a-fiddle" medical records in due time, and everyone can move on.
But, the other possibility is that Bernie's campaign could decide to be dismissive, and as aggressive and defensive as his hardcore supporters are. This could create the wrong impression among voters that he has something to hide.
Voters for whom this could be an issue will have to make up their own minds. The question that remains is whether or not Bernie's campaign will behave in such a way that eases their minds, or in a way that arouses their fears.
It's impossible for me to predict the future, but it will be interesting to watch how all of this unfolds.
(Wishing a speedy recovery for Senator Sanders.)
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)had two hernia surgeries - one in his 60s and the other in his late 70s. The "when" was elective, as neither was a threat to his well-being; just aggravations that he found the time to deal with as it fit his schedule.
He also had six stents - a pacemaker - a temporary colostomy (later repaired) after a bowel resection - surgery to remove a cancerous mass in his abdomen and laser ablation of his liver - all after he turned 75.
His cancer was treated with Gleevic, a chemo drug that he took daily for eight years.
He died five months shy of his 90th birthday and it wasn't any of those things that killed him - but the grief of losing my mother, his wife of 64 years, seven months earlier. He was mentally fit until the week before he died.
My point - in case you missed it - is that age is not an absolute indicator of anything. Even health setbacks don't tell the full story, as my dad could have run intellectual rings around most people until just before his death.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)isn't a chemo drug. It's a kinase inhibitor.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)He took it for eight years as a primary treatment for his cancer - a GIST tumor that was removed but had spread. The Gleevec kept the tumor/s under control. Every year or so they would take him off the drug, then the tumors would begin to grow and he'd go back on it. He was part of a Mayo study/trial - the oldest member who had the tumor removed (since we were told they are very difficult to remove).
I'm sure you know more about it than I.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)then vote for O'Malley!
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Even that is crude because the general health of the 75 year old makes a big difference.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Something Hillary has already done.
Transparency.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Then we can talk.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)See how that works?
Until such time, people have every right to question his health and decide whether he's the one they want to vote for, for president.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The life expectancy of a new born baby isn't relevant at all. You guys are killing me here.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)not the general consensus on the life expectancy of any 75 y/old. Life expectancy, as you've already pointed out, is contingent upon overall health.
But since BERNIE SANDERS failed to release his health records to date - while our front-runner has already released them back in July, so I don't know what the hold-up is with Sanders - we don't know what his health situation is, do we?
The life expectancy of a new born baby isn't relevant at all.
I have no idea what this has to do with the discussion of this subthread.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The OP said "Bernie Sanders will be 75 years old in January 2017. The average life expectancy for a male in the United States is 76 years. For this reason, his health is a legitimate issue that should be discussed." My point was that the 76 year life expectancy of a male is actually the life expectancy of a newborn male. Sanders is not a newborn male. He is 74 years old, and the life expectancy of a 74 year old male is not 76 years. Therefore, the fact that the life expectancy of a male is 76 years is irrelevant to whether his health is a legitimate issue.
Crystalite
(164 posts)I will always prefer the progressive trustworthy champion of the REAL middle working class.
Not that $250,000 year top 5% working class Clinton wants to protect.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)eom
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)see how that worked out
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I just know I can't keep up with either.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)When it isn't hilarious disinformation about Sander's proposals, proposals that are part and parcel of core Democratic Party traditions and principles, proposals that really only republicans should oppose, it is endless nonsense about his hair, his age, his alleged racism, sexism, homophobia and anything else the CERTs can make up to toss out here. All of which is terribly odd when one considers that the same Emergency Response Team holds that she is inevitable, her lead insurmountable, and that we should all just surrender to the borg. Since she is certainly the nominee, what the flying fuck is the point of all this crap? Huh?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When looking at actuarial tables you have to look at the life expectancy for a person who is 75 now:
Life Expectancy (Female): 12.8 years
Life Expectancy (Male): 10.9 years
# Alive Out of 100,000 born: 69,070
Leading Cause of Death: Cancer
See all Life Expectancy & Mortality Rates
http://life-span.healthgrove.com/l/76/75
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It could also trend upwards; the probability distributions that the actuarial tables are derived from are not static in time. The mathematical term for this is a nonstationary stochastic process, or on the distribution side a nonstationary distribution.
The reason for this are medical advances.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Shit stirrers gonna shit and stir.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)Sanders is likely to live long enough to serve both terms .
And from what we see he is in excellent health .both mentally and physically.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)especially considering the average life span of men in this country.
Not to mention a man that would be under enormous stress 24/7/365
Look at President Obama, he's gone grey. The office aged him prematurely. What would it do to a 75 year old man who's having health problems already?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and one which requires a great deal of stamina. Not to mention how constant travel and time zone changes can affect someone. The demands of the office are likely much higher than running for the office.
I'm sure he'll provide voters with the reassurances they need. If voters like and believe his response, this will become a non issue in a few days.
Wishing a speedy recovery to Senator Sanders.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thanks for the heads-up.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Good to know.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Looks like you lose.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)In 6 to 7 years, we might then all give Bill his sympathy card... Oh, wait... he'll be at death's door, too.
Perogie
(687 posts)lostnfound
(16,178 posts)An average of 76 includes people who died at age 1 or 3 or 20 or 30 or 55 or 65..
What you need are actuarial tables. Looking up a 73 year old male, (born 9-8-41) the life expectancy is 86.
Hillar using same calculator has a life expectancy of 87.
.https://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/longevity.cgi
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I suggest that the OP delete the post!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)But she'll happily tell you how much of a "hater" you are.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... that some feel deserves to be answered. Hiding behind privacy concerns and deflecting with accusations of ageism and having one's sensibilities offended only cause more suspicions and doubts. Bernie will likely do the right thing in spite of the hypersensitive and shortsighted concerns of his hardcore fans.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I am sure it is on many voter's minds. Hillary is also getting up there. It will be an issue if the GOP puts up a much younger candidate like Rubio. Hard to say if it will be a negative or a positive.. depends how our candidate frames it.
Regardless its a legitimate topic to discuss. This is a political discussion board..right??
coyote
(1,561 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)health records, or should that be considered confidential and not relevant
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)brooklynite
(94,535 posts)Just his electability.
Reter
(2,188 posts)The average life span for a President is 90 if we take the last several only.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Harry Truman lived to be 88
Richard Nixon lived to be 83
Ronald Reagan lived to be 93
Gerald Ford also lived to be 93
Jimmy Carter is 91
George H.W.Bush is also 91
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)But they both seem very healthy. Heck, much more than myself, and I'm 20 years their junior.
Get the med records out and call it a day, but be ready to fight against the much younger Rubio.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)But since he was never a candidate, it was irrelevant.
R B Garr
(16,951 posts)so someone is locked out from alerting for a while.
moobu2
(4,822 posts)they see him as some kind of religious savior figure type person for some reason.
jfern
(5,204 posts)His 80 year old brother seems to be doing fine.
And the average life expectancy over all 75 year old men is 86, and is going to be higher if you exclude those in poor health.