2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow would you like to see the debates handled?
I would like to see no outside money in campaigns. No commercials.
I'd like about 10 debates, with each side having a group of immediate fact checkers checking each others statements on the truthiness meter. Then, the other side can come back with the facts. This would be followed by each side until all of the truth is out and a subject is completely covered before moving on to the next question. No time limit, no moving on until all party's agree the horse is dead, and each sides position is well defined.
This would be part of public service tv. They would get paid for hosting the program but no million dollar 30 sec commercials.
What would you like to see change in the debates?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Say 500,000 Watts or so.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Lebam in LA
(1,345 posts)My first thoughts were similar.....Have a guy there that can throw a Joe Frazier type punch....Every time someone lies they get punched right in their shit eater.......
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Willard would be electrocuted to death within the first 5 minutes.
renegade000
(2,301 posts)they'd probably shock obama too in the name of balance for some unintentional misstatement, like saying "millions" instead of "billions" that he didn't correct "fast enough"...
ChazInAz
(2,568 posts)The first participant to "Pull A Palin", refuse to actually debate and simply spout lies, spin and talking points, automatically loses and is immediately forced to shut up, sit down and listen to the other rake him over the coals.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)tell me about their solution.
avebury
(10,952 posts)the part of the moderator. You call a candidate on his/her BS and don't let the candidate get away without answering the question. Candidate ABC you said ____________ on this date and ______________ at this function explain yourself type of thing. The purpose of the style that the fictional newsroom came up with was to hold candidates responsible for their idiotic statements and lies. The moderator would keep coming back at a candidate.
Of course we will never see that type debate.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)his nose grows.
wolfman24
(17 posts)Hello
This may sound stupid at first but I think we have the technology to do it.
A long time ago there was a movie called "earth 2" it was about a colony on the moon or on a space station orbiting earth and they were debating what to do about their nukes.
They had a debate between the pro and con guys but whenever one of them talked there was a scroll below them that pointed out when their comment was a lie, factual, misleading or an emotional appeal.
Would it not be great if all of our debates had something like that then we could see who really is able stay on task.
Wolfman 24
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I am convinced that if Americans were told the truth they would know how to vote. As it is, our media has become nothing more than talking heads reading propaganda.
given real facts, Americans can make the right decisions.
longship
(40,416 posts)If the candidate tells a lie, trap door automatically opens and candidate falls into the dungeon.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)to fill in for the first. We could lose a whole slew of repigs before they learned not to lie.
Very good.
tridim
(45,358 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)The LWV did a better job...
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)that Obama was just waiting for Shit Romney to get his stupid ass officially nominated.
I think Obama is going to hit him hard on it now. There is probably enough in there to send him to prison. I think it will remain an issue. How can you stash your wealth that you made here, in foreign accts, to avoid paying taxes, then work your tax forms through enough loops to make you one of the lowest tax rate payers living, and expect to be the POTUS?
You can't. You just can't. He's unAmerican.
ailsagirl
(22,896 posts)I usually like irony but not in this case.
I'm trying not to become enraged because that means they have succeeded in making me unhappy. And I'll be damned if I'm going to let those bastards take away the quality of my life.
We just have to keep on keeping on. And we will.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Be crystal clear then the vast difference between those 2 people.
I trust President Obama would meet-up face to face, no handlers anytime and he should make multiple offers, start with this weekend.
Romney would never even suggest that kind of uncontrolled format and he would have to accept some of the offers or look like he's afraid.
Play offense, no more defense of propaganda/lies. Americans deserve to see how Romney stands on his own 2 feet.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Failing that, I would like to see a debate without a moderator.
If that isn't possible I would like to see the League of Women Voters use one of their own members as the moderator or just pick one at random off the street.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Two go in, one comes out.