2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders: The Best Democrat We Have Had the Privilege to Vote for in a Long Time!
On the issues, without a doubt, there is no one I can think of who has better represented Democrats in Congress and in the Senate than Bernie Sanders over the past several decades.
There are only a few other Democrats who got it as right as Bernie Sanders on the Neocon policies of the disastrous Bush Administration as Bernie Sanders.
They never fooled him with their lies and he wasn't shy about saying so.
Elected office isn't the place for people to go through the learning process.
We need leaders who lead, who don't get it wrong on major issues at the time they are faced with decisions.
If you have to evolve on issue after issue, do it BEFORE being in a position of power where wrong decisions can harm so many people
Thanks Sen. Sanders for giving Democrats a Democrat they could only have dreamed of to vote for in this election.
Now we have to elect as many more Democrats like Bernie, for Congress and the Senate as we can.
He is perfect example of what a Democrat should be!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The party can either listen to the people or listen to Wall St.
Wall St isn't helping them win.
So it is logical that any party that wants to remain relevant, would start listening to the people.
We'll see what happens, but blaming the voters for their failures isn't going to help them any more than it has already.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Regardless of wether or not one believes him to be a *real* member of the Democratic Party
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)The he's not a democrat mantra rings shrill and hollow.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)are reminded of what a Democrat should look like when they listen to him, see him, look at his record. The contrast of what has passed for democrats becomes starkly obvious.
Can't have that. We were supposed to get used to fake Dems like Lieberman eg, and just go along because the 'other guys are worse'.
Bernie is a Democrat. An FDR Democrat.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Great op.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)is what pisses some people -- not to mention names -- off so much,
because I imagine it's downright embarrassing to Establishment Dems
to have a candidate in the race who's the 'real deal' as in FDR's new deal.
This is why we hear, "BUT HE'S NOT A DEMOCRAT!" so much.
It was laughable during the forum when Hillary managed to slip-in some
vague 'new deal' references into one of her responses; which would have
been the furthest thing from her mind, were it not for Bernie stepping up,
and reminding the nation what a real Democrat acts and sounds like.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)doing so well in this race showing that we can still have democrats in office who actually represent democrats and squash the lies that the Country is 'center right'.
He's blowing all the nonsense we've been fed over the past number or years.
Maineman
(854 posts)the democratic party? Corporate money & right wing Democrats would be my guess.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)who don't want to be a part of the whole rigged system.
Too bad a few of the other good Dems we've had didn't follow his example. By being an Independent they had to negotiate with him rather than the other way around. His votes could not be taken for granted, he was able to push for Democratic issues which from inside the party is very difficult these days.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)should lead one to the highest and most humane of democratic principles.
But the current party has few such independent, fearless thinkers.
The demigods of egomania fear and greed must have done them all in.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I was just thinking about this.
Bernie stands for the things that used to be commonplace in middle America. Decency. Compassion. Kindness. Generosity.
He is everything I want for America. And everything that today's young adults can trust to care for their future.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)when they are being lied to, and to recognize honesty, to know when they are not being bamboozled, when they see it.
He is exactly what we need right now. This country has gone way off course and someone has to steer it back.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I was out in the black community (a Saturday ritual around Pittsburgh) and 80% of those who responded are enthusiatically flocking to him.
That's why we have to keep on walking and talking, Sabrina.
MMM
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)effort to try to smear him BEFORE the minority communites got to know him. But we just kept on working to undermine those dirty tricksters. While they are busy NOT working to get their candidate elected, we've been busy introducing him to voters, signing people up and l Know for me,, telling them about the nasty campaigning against him. People don't like that.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)wilsonbooks
(972 posts)If not Bernie, who?
I am 62 and have been waiting a very long time for the fire to be lit. We need to stand together and build the revolution.
bvf
(6,604 posts)and agree 100%.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)That little bug has become quite a symbol!
Lol! Unintended consequences.
The truth is, you can't squash the truth no matter how much it bugs you!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Being against war in 1941 would have made you wrong. Still 50-50.
And while we can differ in our opinion about Iraq, no single vote took us to war there. And half the west was for it as well based on the lies that were told about it. To blame or hold it against Hillary for her vote on the Iraq war is wrong on so many levels because it shifts focus from the culprits who were actually responsible for taking us to war. Also, if you angst about that vote is based on principle than you must be equally angry at all the other folks who voted the same as Hillary...I know for a fact that you are not.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)And knew enough to have voted no.
So should she have known.
Kissinger influence?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)No excuse!!!!
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)I stand agog at that logic. Its not about winning, which in war usually goes to the most bloodthirsty indiscriminate killing machine. It is about a deep understanding of history, ethics, politics and an abiding anchor of morals that takes the path of peace even when you are scorned for your efforts. To stand against mass murder even when it is politically expedient to hide behind a flag.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Jesus H. Christ on a trailerhitch, that's the lamest excuse I've heard yet for Hillary's obscene speech and vote.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)necessary.
It is about having the judgement to know when war is necessary and even then it is a decision not to be taken lightly, and when we are being lied into war.
Sanders made the right decision regarding Iraq.
Hillary made the wrong decision.
We on DU made the right decision even though we had none of the intel they had.
What we did have was Google where we learned that Saddam Hussein had no WMDs.
And we learned why that was the case.
The other thing we KNEW, Bernie KNEW but Hillary didn't was that Iraq had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11.
It's a question of good judgement over bad judgement and FORESIGHT a very important attribute necessary in a leader.
Hillary showed neither of these necessary traits at one of the most critical times in our recent history.
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)... an even "more left" Democrat threw his hat in the ring. By the time Hillary announced, I was already way impressed with Bernie's brand of progressivism, compared to Hillary's Obama-style centrism.
And I don't mean that "Obama-style centrism" is necessarily bad -- a lot has been accomplished -- but having been a DU visitor/reader/follower for the last ten years or so, I just sort of expected everyone would throw in with the most left-leaning, most progressive candidate for their first choice -- not just for 2016, but for ANY election cycle. The notion being that, at any given time in campaign season, you support the candidate whose views and values -- and especially policy positions -- most closely reflect your own.
I've been disappointed in all the internecine warfare here.
For me, I'm not out to punish Hillary for her Iraq war vote, or any Wall Street coziness. I'm not a big fan of poll-tested politics either. Does that stuff concern me? Sure it does. Right now, I'm just more about where we Democrats want to get America going in the future and whose policies and priorities I feel are more likely to get us there. So Bernie is where my support will gravitate during primary season. If Hillary wins the Dem nomination, I'll be voting for her and will still be happy to do it. But in the meantime, she's my distant Plan B.
Bernie is definitely Plan A.
==========================
Duval
(4,280 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)already selected for me long before. We need all primaries to be held on ONE day nationwide, so the true will of the public is actually expressed.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)every state is to be fought for, because votes aren't just chits to be piled up and "cashed in" at the convention
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)the nominee has often been decided long before it gets to Indiana.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)She was there for FDR's time, she said at some time in my life, she hoped I would be fortunate enough to have a Democrat like him to support for the Presidency. Bernie is that Democrat.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)now we have a chance.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)why put someone in the job playing catchup, when you have someone who's been ahead of the curve most of his political life.
you know, the 3:00am phone call and all that
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Win, Bernie, Win!
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)was also a REAL Democrat...This is the first time since then that I have felt like working hard again for a candidate...
Oh, the first was Jimmy Carter...
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)being a hardcore Third Wayer.
Third Wayers ain't no Democrats.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)We don't need any more sell outs.
I hate liars
(165 posts)That's the question I always ask myself.
If someone with Hillary's knowledge and experience weighs in on the wrong side of an issue - like Wall Steet reform, single payer healthcare, starting a war in Syria, or ending the war on drugs, after years of exposure to the issues, shilling is the obvious answer - It's hard to credit ignorance. And when a candidate takes the shill position, it means getting paid is more important than taking a principled position.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)pumpitampum pum pum pum
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)He has even trashed the party in the past. So, we'll see. But in any case, he won't be the nominee.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)The party does not always treat those of us on the left very gently.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)right?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)And Sanders is not a Democrat no matter how much you pretend that he is.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Good on you.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)it appears, from whichever think tank, is going nowhere. Like all the other bought-and-paid-for talking points. We've been keeping track of them, btw.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:31 AM - Edit history (1)
66. Berne is the best Denocrat we've had in a long time. That talking point, this week's latest
it appears, from whichever think tank, is going nowhere. Like all the other bought-and-paid-for talking points. We've been keeping track of them, btw.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=781962
Is this part of your intimidation campaign that's supposed to win people over? Where are you keeping track? I'd like to see it.
Sanders affiliation is a fact. It is not a matter of debate or judgement. Claiming he is a deadens rat discredits you further.
randome
(34,845 posts)Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to have a prayer of securing the nomination. So threads like this are like tilting at a windmill.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)he does have a chance. However we are all aware of the dirty tricks, bought and paid for smear campaigns etc. Corporate funded, see the one we caught, eg, David Brock's attempt to plant a smear in the media re Sanders.
But so long we people keep exposing them, which is not that difficult, he does have a chance.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)No staging, no focus groups, no pandering to war criminals, no personal profit over progress, no BS. Just Bernie.
Autumn
(45,066 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Woo Hoo