750,000 Unscientific People Donate to Bernie Crushing Donald Trump Adding 100,000 in One Month!

[sabrina 1]

He destroys his opponents in 'unscientific' polls which the media quickly deletes.

And he destroys them AGAIN with now over 750,000 'unscientific' individual donors.

100,000 new donors in Hillary's 'great month'.

And his movement is growing every single day!

The People Stand With Bernie Sanders And Crush Billionaire Trump By Surpassing 750,000 Donors

Donald Trump has gotten a great deal of mainstream media attention for the number of donations to his campaign, but Bernie Sanders announced that he has surpassed 750,000 donors, which means that he is at minimum more than ten times bigger than Trump.

Of course the Old Media ignores the REAL NEWS and focuses on Entertainment, The Reality TV Star, the Benghazi Show etc.

But thanks to the more powerful New Media, we do get to hear about real issues and real news!

To put the staggering numbers of Sen. Sanders into context, Donald Trump has taken in 73,942 contributions. Bernie Sanders has 750,000 donors.

Bernie Sanders has gained 100,000 new donors in a month. His growth is all the more impressive because Hillary Clinton has been on a roll over the last few weeks. The Clinton campaign has taken back the momentum in the Democratic primary race and now leads in three of the first four contests. Clinton also leads nationally among Democrats.

I'm sure all of this is very 'unscientific'. REAL PEOPLE voting or donating doesn't really mean anything because people are NOT scientific. So we are told anyhow.

Sen. Sanders is building a movement that will go on even if he doesn’t win the Democratic nomination. The Sanders movement will return to the Senate with him, and the battle against the corporate and billionaires interests will continue.

The Sanders message is resonating to the point where three-quarters of a million Americans have opened their wallets and said enough is enough. Bernie Sanders is steadily building a movement that could change America.

Fortunately people in the real world don't care much about the Corporate Media's non issues related shows, and are quietly focusing on changing this country before it is completely swallowed by Corporations and Wall St Banks.

'Congress doesn't control Wall St, Wall St Controls Congress'- The truth stated by Bernie Sanders in the first Democratic Primary Debate that WON that debate for him as people all over the country applauded him for saying what few of our politicians have the guts to say!



Bernie Sanders the next President of the United States!

[tecelote]

1. I hear it in the streets and see it on bumper stickers which are easily 4 to 1 for Bernie

The media is owned by the same people that own Hillary and they are scared to death over this populist movement.

Making America about Americans will mean the end to corporate welfare, tax havens and low wages. No wonder they are scared.

Hillary is a wonderful person and should be involved but we need change for the American people. Hillary's hands are tied. She is beholden. I implore you to vote for the first candidate in a long time that is supported by the people and will work for the people.

[aspirant]

2. 100.000 in a month

Last edited Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:26 AM - Edit history (1)

and more and more people laughing and ignoring these silly polls, that's a win for me.

We are slowly dismantling this corrupt system.

[raouldukelives]

3. K&R Those who enrich Wall St devalue democracy. nt

[davidpdx]

4. K & R

[Scuba]

5. But wait, the polls that come from oligarch-owned corporations say Hillary is winning.

I mean, if you can't trust the oligarchs who own everything who can you trust?

[aspirant]

6. Isn't our money the means of the oligarch's ownership

and it says "In God We Trust". Since they aren't Gods shouldn't we confiscate all their money and use it in Godly ways?

[in_cog_ni_to]

7. Tha means he needs only 250,000 more donors to hit ONE MILLION DONORS! His prize for that milestone

THE WHITE HOUSE! He should hit 1 million donors in 2 1/2 months, if not sooner!

Proud to be 1 of 750,000 UNSCIENTIFIC donors!

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

K&R!

[NuclearDem]

8. People eligible to donate and people eligible or likely to vote in the primary

aren't the same group.

[Le Taz Hot]

9. So, you think people who take the time to donate to a candidate

will not get out and vote for that candidate? Interesting "logic" you have there.

[NuclearDem]

17. Alright, assume all 750,000 are indeed individual and not repeat donors

and that all of them are eligible to vote (18 years or older, registered, and live in the United States).

Do you think they're all concentrated in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or other early caucus/primary states?

The point was that declaring polls invalid by virtue of donations is completely illogical.

[Le Taz Hot]

20. Actually, the OP was trying to make a point

which I thought was very clear but, here it is again. The MSM keeps telling us, over and over, with (skewed) polls and talking head "experts" that Hillary will be the nominee. Yet, out here in the real world, the world that the MSM and professional "experts" never see, there are huge numbers for Bernie. They're not only donating, they're campaigning, they're registering to vote (many for the first time) and re-registering to vote (so they can vote for Sanders in the primary) and they're holding event after event. Just next week and just in California, our goal is to have 200 events in one week JUST in California alone. Hillary cannot match that and you can denigrate it and downplay it all you want but those number will translate to votes. That was the point.

[StrongBad]

10. A revolution doesn't happen with 25% of the population

[artislife]

11. You actually can far less

http://knowledgenuts.com/2014/02/20/the-strange-secret-of-a-successful-revolution/

But that’s not all she found. Her data also shows how few people are actually needed to topple any government. Rather than the previously accepted 5 percent of the population, it turns out you only need a mere 3.5 percent of all citizens onboard to rid yourself of a tyrannical leader. And the implications go further than merely ridding the world of despots. Stanford University lecturer Balaji Srinivasan has used the same data to argue that a small gathering of like-minded people could generate a “scientific utopia” where “cloud towns, then cloud cities, and ultimately cloud countries materialize out of thin air.”

[Fumesucker]

12. It does if only 30% vote

[sabrina 1]

16. You're talking about only registered Dems. Which make up only 32%

of registered voters. Bernie has way more than that even now, and still half the country has to get to know him.

[CharlotteVale]

13. Oops. New memes while u wait.

[Metric System]

14. What does science have to do with donors?

[sabrina 1]

19. Well I didn't want anyone rushing in here telling me the way they do re polls, that isn't

'scientific'! Lol!

[Go Vols]

15. Proud to be one of the many donating.

[Enthusiast]

18. Kicked and recommended to the fucking Max!

[tritsofme]

21. Strange comparison to make. I don't think Trump is actively fundraising.

Isn't that part of his shtick?

[sabrina 1]

22. No, his schtick is that he isn't taking Corporate money made possible by Citizens United. He boasts

about the number of ordinary people who give small donations to him. The Media has made a big thing of how many small donors he has, while ignoring Bernie for the most part.