Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:30 PM Sep 2015

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (BlueWaveDem) on Tue Oct 6, 2015, 01:27 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 OP
THAT'S LIE!! ronnykmarshall Sep 2015 #1
Yes because Wall Street is run by men who can upaloopa Sep 2015 #3
I believe it. Now, how many millions were given to her PACs, how much of it from men? MindfulOne Sep 2015 #9
I updated with link above. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #14
Here ya go Alittleliberal Sep 2015 #2
Thank You. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #4
You're welcome! Alittleliberal Sep 2015 #5
That's from July 16. beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #6
Correct (edited) Alittleliberal Sep 2015 #7
Ah, the twitterverse! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #10
Yes! Alittleliberal Sep 2015 #12
The tweet above is from a verified political reporter. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #13
That article is from mid July, in regard to her second quarter fundraising. NOT current. hedda_foil Oct 2015 #19
For the record angrychair Sep 2015 #8
I updated with link above. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #11
Most of the money is from large donations jfern Sep 2015 #15
Glad to hear she did great with small donors. hrmjustin Sep 2015 #16
And now most of the HRC supporters are maxed out. Left Ear Sep 2015 #17
Her Priorities PAC raised an additional $25 million. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #18
Take me through this mathematics. delrem Oct 2015 #20
OK, but how *many* donors does she have, as a number? reformist2 Oct 2015 #21

ronnykmarshall

(35,356 posts)
1. THAT'S LIE!!
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:36 PM
Sep 2015

.... just a preview of what the HRC bashers will say.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
3. Yes because Wall Street is run by men who can
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:39 PM
Sep 2015

give millions to Hillary.
Must have been 28 male CEOs who gave Hillary that $28 mil.

 

MindfulOne

(227 posts)
9. I believe it. Now, how many millions were given to her PACs, how much of it from men?
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:46 PM
Sep 2015

How much from the Koch brothers, Exxon, Chevron, JP Morgan Stanley?

That's what the HRC bashers are saying.

And wondering what HRC was talking about in this email:



I don't like it, myself.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
14. I updated with link above.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 09:32 PM
Sep 2015
 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
4. Thank You.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:41 PM
Sep 2015

Alittleliberal

(528 posts)
5. You're welcome!
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:43 PM
Sep 2015

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
6. That's from July 16.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:43 PM
Sep 2015
While Clinton held dozens of high-dollar fundraisers across the country, her small-dollar fundraising operation also proved successful. According to the campaign, 94 percent of donations were for $250 or less, and the average donation was $144.89.


Alittleliberal

(528 posts)
7. Correct (edited)
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:46 PM
Sep 2015

I assumed this is what the poster was talking about. It appears that I was wrong. Apologizes all!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
10. Ah, the twitterverse!
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:47 PM
Sep 2015

Always a good source for info!


Alittleliberal

(528 posts)
12. Yes!
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:49 PM
Sep 2015

I would still like to see a report on what the campaign said but I edited my above reply to avoid spreading misinformation about the now named... but still random twitter poster.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
13. The tweet above is from a verified political reporter.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:53 PM
Sep 2015

hedda_foil

(16,375 posts)
19. That article is from mid July, in regard to her second quarter fundraising. NOT current.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 02:00 AM
Oct 2015

angrychair

(8,739 posts)
8. For the record
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:46 PM
Sep 2015

That article is almost 3 months old. Not as relivent as Bernie's 1 million individual donors in the news today.

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
11. I updated with link above.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 08:49 PM
Sep 2015

jfern

(5,204 posts)
15. Most of the money is from large donations
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 09:33 PM
Sep 2015
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
16. Glad to hear she did great with small donors.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:09 PM
Sep 2015
 

Left Ear

(81 posts)
17. And now most of the HRC supporters are maxed out.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 10:13 PM
Sep 2015

No new supporters will appear after Bernie destroys Clinton on October 13th

 

BlueWaveDem

(403 posts)
18. Her Priorities PAC raised an additional $25 million.
Wed Sep 30, 2015, 11:00 PM
Sep 2015

She has wide range of support across all demographics of the Democratic party base.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
20. Take me through this mathematics.
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 03:57 AM
Oct 2015

Say candidate X has 100 donors, and 93 of them donate $1 or less. Then 93% of X's donors give $1 or less.
Now suppose 4 of them donate between $1 and $2. Then a full 97% of X's donors gave $2 or less, which is amazing. Now suppose that X took in $28million in his campaign. X can now brag that he got $28million 98% of which came from donors sending in $2 or less!

Wow! I wonder if any politician heavily dependent on an extremely small subset of the ultra-rich and ultra-powerful, thought of using that kind of math to prove their popular appeal?

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
21. OK, but how *many* donors does she have, as a number?
Thu Oct 1, 2015, 05:20 AM
Oct 2015
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...