2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (BlueWaveDem) on Tue Oct 6, 2015, 01:27 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts).... just a preview of what the HRC bashers will say.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)give millions to Hillary.
Must have been 28 male CEOs who gave Hillary that $28 mil.
MindfulOne
(227 posts)How much from the Koch brothers, Exxon, Chevron, JP Morgan Stanley?
That's what the HRC bashers are saying.
And wondering what HRC was talking about in this email:
I don't like it, myself.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Alittleliberal
(528 posts)I assumed this is what the poster was talking about. It appears that I was wrong. Apologizes all!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Always a good source for info!
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)I would still like to see a report on what the campaign said but I edited my above reply to avoid spreading misinformation about the now named... but still random twitter poster.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)angrychair
(8,739 posts)That article is almost 3 months old. Not as relivent as Bernie's 1 million individual donors in the news today.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Left Ear
(81 posts)No new supporters will appear after Bernie destroys Clinton on October 13th
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)She has wide range of support across all demographics of the Democratic party base.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Say candidate X has 100 donors, and 93 of them donate $1 or less. Then 93% of X's donors give $1 or less.
Now suppose 4 of them donate between $1 and $2. Then a full 97% of X's donors gave $2 or less, which is amazing. Now suppose that X took in $28million in his campaign. X can now brag that he got $28million 98% of which came from donors sending in $2 or less!
Wow! I wonder if any politician heavily dependent on an extremely small subset of the ultra-rich and ultra-powerful, thought of using that kind of math to prove their popular appeal?