Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Marzupialis

(398 posts)
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 02:31 AM Aug 2012

Larry Sabato: "it’s hard right now to see Obama actually winning Florida"

Yesterday political forecaster Larry Sabato said that "Given how close the race is nationally, it’s hard right now to see Obama actually winning Florida, which appears to have a slight Republican lean in presidential elections. Of all the states Obama won in 2008, he only did worse in North Carolina and Indiana than he did in the Sunshine State." Link

What Sabato doesn't explain is why he thinks Obama's lead in Florida will shrink from his 1.4% lead in the average of all polls. He also ignores the recent pro-Obama trend in this state. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/fl/florida_romney_vs_obama-1883.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Larry Sabato: "it’s hard right now to see Obama actually winning Florida" (Original Post) Marzupialis Aug 2012 OP
Well, todays Pew's National Poll has Obama with a 10 point lead nationally. With a 10 point lead demosincebirth Aug 2012 #1
Pew is the outlier right now. toddwv Aug 2012 #2
Bloomgerg/reuters poll last month had Obama by 11. Who's right? demosincebirth Aug 2012 #21
Larry Sabato proves why these political analysts are becoming irrelevant. Drunken Irishman Aug 2012 #3
i've found that sabato leans right, beyond what his own data show. unblock Aug 2012 #4
Agree. I find that it's the interpretation that has a slant. Like doing a tarot reading. progressivebydesign Aug 2012 #14
Sabato--one of Faux New's favorite commentators WI_DEM Aug 2012 #5
I like Larry and he is usually a straightshooter.. DCBob Aug 2012 #7
I think Sabato's failing to account for how bad a nominee Romney is. flpoljunkie Aug 2012 #6
Concern troll (Sabato)? Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2012 #8
He has more of a shot at Florida than he does in NC or IN right now. Arkana Aug 2012 #9
Florida is weird. Let's just agree on that. CabCurious Aug 2012 #10
With the consistency of the trend it is hard right now to see Obama losing FL. yellowcanine Aug 2012 #11
"It's hard right now to see how desperate Larry Sabato is to find some good news" grantcart Aug 2012 #12
Nate Silver "Obama has a 54% chance of winning Florida" grantcart Aug 2012 #13
However, I do trust Sabato. He leans more center-left than most of these guys. Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #15
I knew Sabato a bit back in college onenote Aug 2012 #17
I know Larry, too. He wrote an American Government 101 textbook with one of other professors Liberal_Stalwart71 Aug 2012 #20
IMO OObama currently leading in reality, but factoring in voter suppression K8-EEE Aug 2012 #16
Sabato giving Romney benefit of the doubt Ira Aug 2012 #18
Sabato assigns 247 electoral votes to Obama Ira Aug 2012 #19
He should word it differently DFW Aug 2012 #22

demosincebirth

(12,537 posts)
1. Well, todays Pew's National Poll has Obama with a 10 point lead nationally. With a 10 point lead
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 02:59 AM
Aug 2012
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/pew-obama-national-lead.php?ref=fpb


I don't think Florida would make that much difference or he has some bum polling numbers.

toddwv

(2,830 posts)
2. Pew is the outlier right now.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 03:12 AM
Aug 2012

And prone to large fluctuations.

It's more important to watch trends as opposed to single data points.

As America gets to know Romney better, they will like him less. Trust me on this.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
3. Larry Sabato proves why these political analysts are becoming irrelevant.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 04:56 AM
Aug 2012

They get too caught up in their own data and ignore the outside world. Every one of 'em. They all look at elections through a prism that, in their view, should never change. You can't do that. Every election is different than the past and what one state does one year doesn't mean squat four years later.

There are just so many variables that to make a statement like that, when the polls suggest otherwise, just sets yourself up for failure.

He might be right. In November, Obama might lose Florida. But he isn't losing it right now and there is a good chance he does win it in November. Yes, it would defy some political odds, but this campaign more than any other shows just how much Obama is defying the political odds.

unblock

(52,227 posts)
4. i've found that sabato leans right, beyond what his own data show.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 08:11 AM
Aug 2012

whereas rasmussen somehow gets actual data that show things are better for republicans than every other pollster, sabato as an analyst looks at data and often seems to come up with a conclusion slightly to the right of any other analyst.

while intellectually wrong, perhaps his bias roughly equals the vote-rigging edge republicans gain in the counting of actual votes....

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
14. Agree. I find that it's the interpretation that has a slant. Like doing a tarot reading.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:00 PM
Aug 2012

the cards may say something, and like the numbers in the polls, they're sitting right there. What you do with the info you have, and how you explain it to people, is where your own bias comes in. I notice that with a lot of these guys.

He could have easily said, well.. looking at the numbers, he's ahead in Florida and overall with likability and trust polling, I'd say that Romney would have a hard time winning Florida.

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
5. Sabato--one of Faux New's favorite commentators
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 08:18 AM
Aug 2012

Obama can win FL, but of course the GOP with their voter law requirements are doing their best to try and steal it by limiting voting. The GOP can't win an election honestly. They need to pull these types of stunts to win--same as they are trying to do in PA. Of course, Obama doesn't need FL to win. He can win with his base states and Ohio and one other little state. Romney practically has to run the field.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
7. I like Larry and he is usually a straightshooter..
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 09:53 AM
Aug 2012

but its starting to sounds like he's becoming a bit "foxified".

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
8. Concern troll (Sabato)?
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 09:57 AM
Aug 2012

Thanks for your concern, Larry. Just wait until President Obama starts talking about the Ryan Budget and what that's going to do for upcoming Medicare recipients.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
9. He has more of a shot at Florida than he does in NC or IN right now.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 10:13 AM
Aug 2012

Sabato's just ignoring almost every poll out there right now in favor of a narrative. Disappointing.

CabCurious

(954 posts)
10. Florida is weird. Let's just agree on that.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 10:20 AM
Aug 2012

It's so hard to predict where things in FL will go in November.

A lot will depend on how well Romney can handle the latino vote (which can't get much worse).

It will mostly come down to voter turn-out there.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
11. With the consistency of the trend it is hard right now to see Obama losing FL.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 10:38 AM
Aug 2012

Of course things can change. But up to RIGHT NOW Obama has been holding a narrow lead in FL for a while in most polls and the trend seems to be in Obama's favor. Further, national polls tend to follow state polls, not the other way around. Shifts in support usually show up in state polls first. Given that Obama seems to be gradually increasing his hold on most traditionally blue states and battleground states from 2008, I predict that within a few weeks the national polls will begin to reflect a larger Obama lead as well - absent some game changing event against that trend. And the closer we get to November, the less chance of some kind of game changing event. Yes the Republican convention could be a stunning success for Romney, the Democratic convention could be a stunning failure for Obama, the economy could suddenly tank if the European economic crisis blows up, or Obama COULD get crushed by Romney in the debates - what are the real chances of any of these happening? Not much, imo. OTOH bad news for Romney on his personal financial dealings as well as gaffes in debates or otherwise which play into the public's propensity to dislike Romney are likely.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
12. "It's hard right now to see how desperate Larry Sabato is to find some good news"
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 11:17 AM
Aug 2012

Only because I can't see him.

Another RW hack that is quickly losing his academic reputation.

Nate Silver gives Obama a 54% chance of winning Florida.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/02/aug-2-when-a-poll-that-seems-like-news-isnt/
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
15. However, I do trust Sabato. He leans more center-left than most of these guys.
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:02 PM
Aug 2012

I would listen to what he has to say because he's seldom been wrong in the past.

On the other hand, I trust Nate Silver's analysis more because he really has the numbers to back up his claims. He doesn't just make these claims without explaining why as Larry just did.

onenote

(42,703 posts)
17. I knew Sabato a bit back in college
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:16 PM
Aug 2012

he was a strong progressive and a vocal opponent of the Vietnam War at a school where neither of those points of view reflected the predominant sentiment.

He calls them as he sees them. Sometimes he gets it right, sometimes not. Sometimes his analysis upsets repubs and sometimes it upsets Democrats.

I don't think he's a "hack."

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
20. I know Larry, too. He wrote an American Government 101 textbook with one of other professors
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 08:28 PM
Aug 2012

Karen O'Connor. I know he knows what he's talking about. It's just weird that he left us hanging with this analysis.

K8-EEE

(15,667 posts)
16. IMO OObama currently leading in reality, but factoring in voter suppression
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:15 PM
Aug 2012

GOP aims to steal at least 3% of the vote through suppression tactics so Obama has to poll 4% ahead in FL to have a chance.

Ira

(51 posts)
18. Sabato giving Romney benefit of the doubt
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:18 PM
Aug 2012

Sabato's published Electoral Vote opinion map shows:
Obama 237
Romney 206
Tossups 95.
He has not updated his online opinion since April 6.

The average of 22 online electoral college opinion maps is currently:
Obama 248
Romney 197
Tossups 93.

http://peanutgallerypolitical.blogspot.com/

Ira

(51 posts)
19. Sabato assigns 247 electoral votes to Obama
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 12:23 PM
Aug 2012

Sorry. Previous posting used wrong link for recent Sabato map.
Here is the right link:

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/category/2012-president/

As of August 1, Obama 247.

DFW

(54,378 posts)
22. He should word it differently
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 11:36 PM
Aug 2012

I see Obama winning Florida like I saw Gore winning Florida.

I can also see Obama's win in Florida being stolen from him by Republican corruption, led by Scalia and Rick Scott telling the country afterward to get over it, sort of in the same tone as a rigid anti-abortionist talking to a pregnant rape victim.

Take away voter suppression and Republican Stalinist-style vote "counting," and I can easily see Obama winning Florida.

(I know Republicans hate being told they resemble notorious Communists, but if the shoe fits........)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Larry Sabato: "it’s ...