2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRomneys are 'Downton Abbey' fans
Politico:In an interview with Piers Morgan airing Thursday, Ann Romney says theyre fans of the PBS show, according to CNNs Jonathan Wald.
Downton Abbey follows the story of the Granthams, an upper class British family, and their servants who work and live on their estate.
The jokes just keep writing themselves...
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)I am guessing they think it is like Survivor or something like that.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)They probably look at it as an amusing portrayal of middle class life in pre-WWI England.
The "middle class" being the Granthams.
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)How about doctoring the below photo to make a "Downton Romney" pic (i.e., replacing Crawley family members with the Romneys).
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)"Why don't the staff just stab the rich bastards and be done with it?"...
It is a truly excellent show if you've never seen it...no punches pulled about what a bunch of self-absorbed bastards the Granthams are...it will be interesting to see how they deal with the societal changes that evolve as the show progresses in years..
(I always wonder, looking back, why the indentured servitude lasted so long, was it sort of a Stockholm syndrome?)
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)The fact that the Romney's claim to enjoy it doesn't change anything.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)..although I am sure they view it quite differently than 98% of the rest of us...
noel711
(2,185 posts)To 'be in service' was a reputable role for the working class prior to WWI-
but no one was forced to do it.
It was a choice to work 'in service' or be in the coal mines,
or be a free lance 'char lady..' or shear sheep.
Not too many options for working class, under educated folks.
To be 'above stairs' was to be 'to the manor born...'
you couldn't earn it.. no matter how much you made.
That was evident in "Downton' series 2 by Lady Mary's suitor,
a kind of media magnate who was filthy rich, but totally
unsuitable to the upper classes.
indentured servitute came into being especially during the colonization
of our nation; immigrants came escaping war and poverty in Europe
and volunarily sold themselves for a period of time until their debts
were paid off. "Indentured" was the term because the document
of term servitude had 'teeth' (in-dentured), not only philosophically,
but it was 'torn' and the own held one half, the servant the other.
When his/her time had expired, he/she kept both piece to prove
their freedom, and was given a fresh set of clothing, tools of their
trade, and a small amount of money. Any personal items given by their
'owner' or any education given while in servitude (that was often suggested:
'teach these peasants how to read').. was a bonus.
But voluntary 'in service' was not a bad thing; my grandma had to
quit school in 8th grade to work as housemaid because her family
from Norway was so poor. She always regretted not going back to
school. But she did what she had to do; lower classes had little choice.
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)on the east coast. She had her own apartment. When she retired she moved back home to her Swedish community in the midwest. It was considered that she had done quite well. Basically she managed the staff of a large hotel.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)when they were young and struggling.
RedStateLiberal
(1,374 posts)on those less fortunate than them.
CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)I love Downton Abbey; am thrilled by its Emmy nominations; and I have no regard for political candidates' tastes.
Sorry if I seem cold. I just don't care about the Romneys' entertainment pleasures.
MissMarple
(9,656 posts)It is an interesting look at how things were. Times changed fairly rapidly after the war, although it probably is fair to say that we are in another "gilded age". But it is far too hard to fully staff a home like those today. Well, unless you are from the middle east oil money. Besides, it is in such bad taste. Save for the queen, of course. There are standards.
And I have a friend who has had a horse trained for dressage. And no they don't have pots of money, or staff, or any of that stuff. And she takes care of her own horses.
Like the poor, the rich will always be with us. They just need to learn to pay their fair share.
brooklynite
(94,552 posts)...but Mitt Romney isn't "anyone". He's an ultra-rich elitist who feels the need to pander to a working-class voting bloc which is far less likely to watch Masterpiece Theater if there's a Sunday night football game, and he feels the need to pander to a Tea Party movement which hates Public Broadcasting. There's no good way this is going to humanize him in the minds of his voters.