2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWould you vote for Hillary as a 3rd Party Candidate in the General Election?
.
Bernie Sanders already attested that he would never run 3rd party--giving the election to the Republicans!
Folks here raise the Bernie question as a means of marginalizing him, even after he made that declaration.
In the scope of fairness, the same question should be fielded toward candidate Clinton.
===
Would you vote for Hillary as a 3rd Party Candidate in the General election?
.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,692 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)RKP5637
(67,108 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Unless we change the constitution and become a parlimentary system I would never vote for a third party candidate in a national election.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Would never happen anyway.
apnu
(8,756 posts)I said that in the thread of the same question but with Bernie's name which was put up by a Hillary supporter.
I say the same thing here.
We need one liberal candidate. The political landscape of America is such, right now, that having two competing liberals (even if one is 3rd Way liberal) is just handing the White House to the GOP.
And the GOP field is 16 loons. Not one is fit to lead. Not one.
America doesn't have the surplus of good will and economics to survive 4 years of a Republican right now.
RKP5637
(67,108 posts)totally break the back of this country.
riversedge
(70,216 posts)sake of asking a silly question.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)when it was asked about bernie? because he has said repeatedly that he is running as a dem and is not interested in a third party candidacy.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)How DARE you suggest such a thing!
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)doc03
(35,336 posts)DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)justhanginon
(3,290 posts)because she is an actual Democrat and member of the Democratic party.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)Who only chimed in to say the question "wasn't fair"....They can dish shit out but they sure can't take it!
ericson00
(2,707 posts)as 3rd party candidates aside from Ventura are.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)She is exactly what what I protested against in Seattle, Cancun, and during Occupy Wall St.
WTF, I'm not going to vote for a Wall St puppet after repeatedly risking getting my head busted open by psycho cops protecting the interests of her billionaire bankster benefactors.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=495072
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,194 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)No.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)I can picture her standing silently as Bill endorses Trump as a third-party candidate, just to stop Bernie.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Have to entertain.
RandySF
(58,808 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)That's not how politics works in the US.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)to not sit on their hands if Hillary is nominated, yet Hillary fans have to take a loyalty oath?
Clinton has a history of putting party before self. The antecedents of of the people that support Sanders do not.
Bradley supporters voted green or sat on their hands in fairly large numbers, Obama supporters threatened to sit on their hands in 2008.
I have voted in every presidential election in which I was eligible I won't change that and I don't believe in loyalty oaths, I won't change that either.
Response to TheBlackAdder (Original post)
olddots This message was self-deleted by its author.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)m
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Hekate
(90,683 posts)It goes without saying that any candidate for POTUS has to have a healthy-sized ego, but it takes extreme self-centeredness and a desire for vengeance to run as a 3rd party candidate and throw the election to the opposition.
That's a Trump move. As far as I can tell, none of the Dem candidates are that petty.