2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum“I have seen pictures from them and I obviously find them disturbing,” Clinton told the Union Leader
<snip> in an interview Tuesday with the New Hampshire Union Leader, Clinton fell into the trap the Center for Medical Progress, the right-wing front group that made the secretly recorded videos, set for pro-choice Democrats: To express at least some discomfort toward Planned Parenthood and its practice of donating fetal tissue.
I have seen pictures from them and I obviously find them disturbing, Clinton told the Union Leader.
Read more: http://bluenationreview.com/hillary-clinton-makes-one-misstep-in-defending-planned-parenthood/#ixzz3hOXzkgbM
Ok ...apparently she didn't research into the source and editing of the video. What is "disturbing" is the malicious editing of the video which was done so as to sick the attack dogs on Planned Parrenthood. So now Hillary is aligned with Rick Scott who also found the video to be disturbing and worth investigating Florida's Planned Parenthood.
Thanks for the help ...Hillary. Maybe she should have sat on the fence about this for a while before blathering her uninformed opinion?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....his followers are doing a great job for him.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)I guess that, since none of the other anti-Hillary smears have gone anywhere, and the polls are leveling out with Hillary up by 35-40 points, now it's come to this.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)cocainecowboy
(45 posts)Prove that Clinton is on message with facts instead of showing polls after polls showing her declining trends claiming 40plus points over Bernie. Two months ago it was 60. After the second debate it will be a tie based on projected trends.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)She has a career of unabashedly standing up for a women's right to choose.
Read about her on this topic and then get back to us with "Polls. Its all you got."
DanTex
(20,709 posts)In terms of women's issues and reproductive rights, she's also got a stellar voting record and close ties to Planned Parenthood that go back a long time.
As far as polling trends, Bernie made up about 10 points in June, but the numbers haven't changed much in July. I'm not sure which pollster is projecting a tie after the second debate, but I don't see it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I don't care for images of plastic surgery, sex change surgery, or tumor excision, either. I find them difficult to watch.
What should she have said? "Oh, can I have a copy of that? I'd like to hang it over the sofa?"
I think the full measure of the piece can be found under the headline:
Hillary Clinton is a longtime, stalwart champion for womens rights in general and reproductive rights in particular. When anti-choice activists released deceptive, highly edited videos accusing Planned Parenthood of selling fetal tissue for profit, she quickly spoke out in Planned Parenthoods defense.
I think she hit the note on the money and threaded a difficult needle. There are--and some don't like this but reality bites at times--plenty of people who give full-throated support to CHOICE, but don't necessarily want to sit by the doctor's side while s/he does the procedure or poke through the after-effects, either.
People who don't "get" this and who are trying to "make something of it," are working very hard at turning allies away.
Not smart at all. Pick something else.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)No.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Those are republicans. This is beyond foolish on your part. It shows your lack of knowledge to her history on this issue. It negates any further discussion you have with respect to Clinton. I suggest you find someone to support. You are clearly doing the attack thing wrong.
You are now attacking one of PPH's greatest advocates and one of our most outspoken leaders on choice. It must really suck to attack her on this issue as you are. How does it feel to attack one the strongest voices we have when it comes to choice? Never had any interest in asking a republican this question. You are the first "progressive" I have ever had the chance to ask.
On the "Hillary" page of that website, there is literally one story that questions one sentence she said. The rest of the stories are complete praise. Transparent.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)that "Debbie Downer" made. September can't come too soon.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Transcript of Union Leader interview with Hillary Clinton:
Question: I wanted to ask you about the Planned Parenthood videos. Have you seen those?
Clinton: "I have seen pictures from them and I obviously find them disturbing. Planned Parenthood is answering questions and will continue to answer questions. I think there are two points to make. One, Planned Parenthood for more than a century has done a lot of really good work for women: cancer screenings, family planning, all kinds of health services. And this raises not questions about Planned Parenthood so much as it raises questions about, you know, the whole process, that is, not just involving Planned Parenthood, but many institutions in our country. And if theres going to be any kind of congressional inquiry, it should look at everything and not just one part of it.
Question: Quick question, follow-up. As you mentioned out there, there is a fundamental right, or fundamental protection ...
Clinton: Yes, thats what the Supreme Court said
Question: Are you worried that the videos and the controversy might lead to activist groups chipping away at the funding for abortions and womens services?
Clinton: "Well, there is no funding that, you know, would be any more at risk than it already has been for years because this has been an ongoing dispute, and Im well aware that passions are very high. I have said for more than 22 years that abortion should be legal, safe and rare. And as First Lady, I led an effort to try to lower the number of teen-age pregnancies and we succeeded, and as President I will continue to work toward that so that women are fully empowered, they can afford to make responsible decisions, and I hope that we will be successful with that.
Question: What were your two biggest achievements as Secretary of State?
Clinton: "Well, I think there were many because we inherited a lot of problems in the world. If I had to pick two, I would say, No. 1, putting together the coalition that imposed sanctions on Iran, which I did for the first 18 months that I was Secretary of State, culminating first in the Security Council deciding that, including Russia and China, they would impose sanctions. And then continuing with a persistent effort to actually enforce those sanctions, which made it possible for us to get to the negotiating table to determine whether there was an agreement that we could be behind. I think on the other issues, whether it was forming better communication and cooperation with China, or reaching out to our allies in Europe who felt very neglected, putting together an economic strategy in the State Department to win and keep American jobs something very important to me standing up for Internet freedom ... theres just a long list. But I put the Iran sanctions at the top of it because thats in the news today."
Question: Speaking of the Iran deal itself, is there anything in that deal at this point that makes you squirm, that makes you uncomfortable?
Clinton: Well, Id start from the fundamental premise -- I dont trust the Iranians. This is not Ronald Reagans trust but verify. This is dont trust and verify. And I have no illusions about the regime were dealing with. You dont make peace or agreements with your friends. You do it with adversaries. I think its a deal that if vigorously enforced, which is what I would do as president, will keep the lid on Irans nuclear weapons program. And I think thats in the security interest of the United States, of Israel and the region.
Question: This morning, of course, you were asked about the Keystone pipeline. If you were President today, and that came across your desk, would you approve it?
Clinton: You know I cant answer that and I wont answer it because I am, No. 1, not President, and No. 2, I was the Secretary of State who started the process and its not, in my view, appropriate for me to be commenting on an ongoing process that I had a role in, in beginning. And this is going to be up to Secretary Kerry and President Obama. I will certainly express an opinion once they make a decision and, as I also said this morning, if they dont make a decision before they leave office, when Im President I will make a decision, and I will explain what my decision would be.
Question: And you knew of course that you were going to get some of your opponents raising that issue -- that you should answer.
Clinton: None of them were Secretary of State. They can say with absolute freedom, with no threat of looking like Im interfering, or maybe even inviting lawsuits over which way it goes. They are in a totally different position. I have taken strong stands on many, many issues and I will continue to do so. This is one, though, because of my prior responsibilities that it is not appropriate for me to do so.
Question: If an investigation does find that there was classified material in the email system over your private server, should
what should the consequences be of that?
Clinton: There was none. There was no classified -- there was no material that was marked classified that was sent to, or that I sent, at all. So, this is not what this is about, and you can go to my website and you can understand the complicated and unfortunate inaccuracies that have been indulged in in describing this situation.
Question: (Theres) a progressive checklist out there in the Democratic primary. One of your opponents, of course, is Bernie Sanders, hes coming on strong. What are two big policy differences between you and your former Senate colleague?
Clinton: Look, Im not going to be criticizing my fellow Democrats. Im going to be criticizing the Republicans. There will be time for all of us to debate during the course of this and let voters pick their own candidate and make their own minds up. But Im not going to be criticizing any of my Democratic opponents for the sake of doing that. I want to talk about what Im for and roll out my agenda.
- See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150729/NEWS0605/150729073#sthash.p7rSWEO1.dpuf
George II
(67,782 posts)....a comprehensive response to a question.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)There are some interesting things in this interview. Not that the op would care.
Question: If an investigation does find that there was classified material in the email system over your private server, should
what should the consequences be of that?
Clinton: There was none. There was no classified -- there was no material that was marked classified that was sent to, or that I sent, at all. So, this is not what this is about, and you can go to my website and you can understand the complicated and unfortunate inaccuracies that have been indulged in in describing this situation.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Question: (Theres) a progressive checklist out there in the Democratic primary. One of your opponents, of course, is Bernie Sanders, hes coming on strong. What are two big policy differences between you and your former Senate colleague?
Clinton: Look, Im not going to be criticizing my fellow Democrats. Im going to be criticizing the Republicans. There will be time for all of us to debate during the course of this and let voters pick their own candidate and make their own minds up. But Im not going to be criticizing any of my Democratic opponents for the sake of doing that. I want to talk about what Im for and roll out my agenda.
George II
(67,782 posts)...this OP attempt at smearing Hillary has been a major failure.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Wish folks would concentrate on the real evil, the evil of the mass lie factory of the GOP and all their media enablers.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)After abandoning us on economic rights, they have to find a new appeal to the widest base possible. When the DLC convinced Democrats to give up economic rights, they told those same Democrats they would have to now compromise on social rights. That is why she opposed gay marriage and is willing to "seek common ground" on abortion with the anti-abortion crowd.
Triana
(22,666 posts)Planned Parenthood in order to get it defunded, which will deny many poor women healthcare, STD and cancer screenings - and contraception - ensuring more unwanted pregnancies and abortions - unsafe ones instead of safe ones.