2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow the National Rifle Association helped get Bernie Sanders elected
Vote for the socialist, the gun rights group said. Its important.
Bernie Sanders is a more honorable choice for Vermont sportsmen than Peter Smith, wrote Wayne LaPierre, who was and still is a top official at the national NRA, backing Sanders over the Republican incumbent.
As a candidate in 1990, Sanders won over gun rights groups by promising to oppose one bill they hated a measure that would establish a waiting period for handgun sales. In Congress, he kept that promise. The dynamic served as an early demonstration that, despite his pure-leftist persona, Sanders was at his core a pragmatic politician, calculating that he couldnt win in rural Vermont without doing something for gun owners.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-nra-helped-put-bernie-sanders-in-congress/2015/07/19/ed1be26c-2bfe-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
This is why it is dangerous to underestimate Bernie - he is a canny and pragmatic politician. He hasn't lasted as long as he has on pure idealism.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The NRA has given him "F" grades for failing to support them. What does one make of that?
hack89
(39,171 posts)that upsets the NRA for some reason.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I don't know how much faith I'd put in their rating system to begin with.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)The reason Mr. Sanders is not your preferred candidate is no longer that he is a (democratic-)Socialist, but because he is pragmatic?
Is that the new meme?
hack89
(39,171 posts)I would love America to be more like Sweden or Norway. I support HRC but if Bernie is our candidate, I would vote for him with absolutely no hesitation.
My point is that it is dangerous to underestimate him.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)he will learn and adjust his message. It is easy to dismiss him because his base is so narrow but it is a dangerous assumption that he won't figure out a way to appeal to POC.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)have the backs of PoC, LGBT, and women.
Sounds like a winning situation to me.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)We have not yet finished with the Sanders is a racist and the NrN protest in Phoenix coupled with the Twitterverse proves it.
We can't move on to how he is a gun humper until this meme runs its course.
So please kindly self-delete, and we will let you know when to start this meme up again.
The American electorate is just not smart enough these days to handle two memes at once.
hack89
(39,171 posts)just a pragmatic politician. His middle of the road views on guns make him an even more dangerous opponent - you know he will not make gun control a key part of his campaign.
frylock
(34,825 posts)at least not in the general.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)I'll go with Bernie.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)I'm concerned about now.
"Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record"
http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Bernie_Sanders_Gun_Control.htm
Vinca
(50,299 posts)That's not the NRA of today so I don't think any association of any candidate from that time period is good for anything other than an attempt at an attack on their character. Come to think of it, back in the 1980's I took some NRA firearms training. Guess that makes me a faux leftie.
hack89
(39,171 posts)best gift the NRA ever received.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I know a lot of people who agree 100% with the dems on economic issues but will not vote for them due to the democrats being perceived as anti freedom over the issue of guns.
The fact that he was attacked by the radical black activists will only help him with same, since they perceive the dems as being for minorities but not for the average worker.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)You can tell he took a measured stance on what made sense for a state like Vermont, where like Bernie, their laws gives more latitude for gun ownership, etc. than many other states that have more city demographics where gun violence is more of a problem.
I think this issue is a testament of a politician that listens to their constituents, as both Bernie Sanders and Howard Dean have done as politicians in Vermont, and how they are willing to work more towards more stricter regulatory stances at a federal level to help the problems with guns in other states and communities, when they are listening more to a constituency at a national level.
I think their stances make good sense for us. If there is shown to be a lot more violence in a growing population center in Vermont, I would be surprised if either of them would look to more state laws to regulate those situations too. But this is why as Thom Hartmann says that many parts of Vermont, where he also used to live, he'd drive through very Republican communities and see campaign signs both for someone like Romney or McCain for president, and Bernie Sanders for senator on the same lawn.
They know him and they LIKE that he works for them. As Bernie's campaign grows nationally, the same thing will happen nationally. Voters will come to know him and will like that he has worked for Vermonters and also will work for them too, and not Korporate Amerika!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I believe Obama called her Annie Oakley after that.
You're welcome, HC supporters.