2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMemo to Bernie supporters
Referring to the #BlackLivesMatter movement as ratfuckers or referring to Hillary as a wh*re is not the best way to gain support for your candidate.
Alienating women and minorities isn't very smart.
Just my two cents.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I was disgusted here yesterday and still am.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)who does that isn't a DU er and should be ignored. Anyone who reverses their support because of something a troll said on the internet was never a supporter. How is Bernie Sanders responsible for the trolling of a few people on a forum? If you turned away from his ideas and possibilities because of that, it is highly possible you never supported him anyway.
IMHO
And it is possible to say this as a general statement and not as a pointed remark to you, bravenak. I have to say I like to read your posts and I do.
Trolls are everywhere. Read the remarks under the John McCain story at the hill. People like that only make my support more firm. If Bernie Sanders had said it, then maybe not but he cannot be blamed and held responsible for trolls for him anymore than Hillary Clinton. IMHO
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
George II
(67,782 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Tell us why to vote for your guy. That is what should happen.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Claiming to be a Hillary supporter suspected of trashing any other candidate I will call the out. It is going to take a concentrated effort. I have read several negative posts against Hillary whom I suspect of being a RW troll.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)So "maybe" even if Bernie had said it you would not be bothered by it?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Why are you so taken aback by my question?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Condescended to, patronized, paternalized, talked at, etc.
Pissed that Sanders canceled on BLM. That is my do or die issue. Nothing else is more important to me. Black lives matter is the most important thing to me. I took it personally that he let his ego get in between himself and the chance to reach out to the black community. Also did not like all the Miss Millieing.
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)It wasn't pretty. I hope that both Bernie and his supporters can work hard to gain back your trust and support. You were a good ally and at that moment we were not. You deserved better.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)I guess it needed to be spelled out.. After yesterday and today, I'm flummoxed by many of the responses to these events.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I found that particularly disgusting.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)calimary
(81,262 posts)But the "whore" comment really took the cake.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)I have no idea what that refers to.
Probably a good thing.
mcar
(42,329 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)You took a single post that most Sanders supporters disavowed from a troll and are smearing us all with it.
Then you add another one dismissing our support and Sanders of BlackLivesMatter.
Check out the 12,000 strong supporters and Sanders speech in Phoenix last night.
I dare you to tell me that we or he is in any way alienating women or minorities. I fucking dare you!
As a bi-racial man who was there, I am just giving my two cents as well.
It's the cumulative effect of the dismissive posts, and adopting the RW terms such as "race-baiting" and "race card," that account for the reaction that you're seeing.
Tone deaf in the extreme. Continue with this attitude at your own peril.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Continue at yours.
I am a person of color.
I see divisiveness being used a political tool for one candidate and one candidate only.
it is going to bite her and her supporters on the ass real soon.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Keep laughing..
TM99
(8,352 posts)Keep digging.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)is the doubling down on the dismissiveness.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Go read my actual supportive posts of BLM AND this protest.
London Lover Man
(371 posts)instigated by the Clinton campaign, but I don't subscribe to much of conspiracy theory.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)London Lover Man
(371 posts)I don't subscribe to much of conspiracy theory. That thought was dismissed.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Yet you think Hillary is so powerful that she got them to heckle Sanders and O'Malley.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Links, please. How is it we never heard about it, whereas this is all that anyone is talking about in reference to Bernie, today?
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)They've changed the name from Yearly Kos to Netroots Nation, but it's the same group that Hillary was heckled in front of in 2007.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bc3ccd7839a1420f9c20a25ee81077df/omalley-faces-demonstrators-liberal-netroots-convention
The Netroots Nation convention has been a rough place for presidential candidates before. Clinton last appeared in 2007, when it was called the Yearly Kos, and heard boos from some activists who disapproved of her vote for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and her acceptance of campaign contributions from lobbyists.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)As far as I know. There could be an element of "gotcha back" about making this happen at Net Roots Nation, I suppose.
AFAIK, no other candidates has been heckled by BLM except Bernie and Martin.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)"all lives matter" (after previously acknowledging that "black lives matter" , neither Sanders nor O'Malley, given this shining opportunity, had the presence of mind at Netroots to simply say:
"Yes. Black lives matter." Full stop.
They had the chance to score some points on her and they blew it. And then some of their supporters accuse her of being in a conspiracy with BLM to make Sanders and O'Malley look bad.
It's just so ridiculous.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)after the fact. Not equatable.
Everyone, including BLM, knew that Hillary wouldn't be at NRN15. This was planned to embarrass the other candidates. Dirty tricks. Will blowback.
I agree, this stunt, the "Bernie doesn't care about minorities" Meme, and and this whole racially-divisive smear job are ridiculous.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)Neither Hillary nor her supporters made them do that, or pulled a political dirty trick.
They just couldn't bring themselves to say: Black Lives Matter.
Period. Full stop.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Don't be coy. This isn't an isolated event, or just about poor event management, and you know it.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)any of them don't care about minorities.
But let's pretend the protesters WERE part of a smear job. Sanders and O'Malley could have easily avoided any "smear" by simply answering the protestors with four simple words: YES, BLACK LIVES MATTER.
They didn't. That was their mistake. You can't blame anyone else for that.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)and you know it.
It doesn't matter what either O'Malley or Sanders had said. Did you see or read the interview with Patrisse Cullors, one of the BLM organizers? It wasn't a reaction to what was said, it wasn't about persuasion, it was about acting out and disruption of progressive Democrats. She said so, herself.
http://bluenationreview.com/breaking-first-reactions-from-patrisse-cullors-during-call-out-at-netroots-nation/#ixzz3gLZRtI9P
A: We just lost another one of our sisters, Sandra Bland, in police custody....
We are deeply disturbed...that law enforcement continues to brutalize and kill our communities, and get away with it.
Today's action was about calling out elected officials who may seem progressive, that you're progressive is not enough. We need more...
This is our moment...
If Ella Baker, Assata Shakur, and Martin Luther King stood silent, we would not be in this current moment today.
Q: If you don't talk about it, it doesn't exist, right?
A: Yes...
Q: Not talking about racism, not doing anything about racism - we as progressives, as Democrats, can sit around and say, "That's great." But unless you take the flag down, unless you restore the Voting Rights Act, do all these things that you're supposed to be doing, that should have been done for decades, it's not going to change...
A: When we shut an action like this down, we want you to stand in solidarity with us. For media, we want you to tell our stories the way we want them told. When law enforcement gives you police reports on our past convictions, we don't want that to be the headline, coupled with, "that's probably why we were killed." There's a way in which we need to shift narratives in this current moment. There needs to be a radical shift in the narrative of black people and our stories, and there needs to be a radical solidarity with us.
This action shouldn't be something that's annoying. People should be proud to be a part of this time in history. The Confederate flag has been taken down. When new black leaders are rising up and saying, "Stop killing us."
This is our moment to shine, and people should feel honored....
I want to make a specific ask to the presidential candidates, specifically the Democrats who are trying to reach into poor communities, people in black and latino communities. Your reform efforts have to be much more radical.
We need to hear that you are going to end detentions. We need to hear that you are going to ensure that ICE is out of jails. We need to hear that you are going to make sure that the one million black people who are currently living inside of US jails and prisons, that there are going to be real reform efforts to get them to be able to vote, that they will be able to have jobs when they come home.
We want to hear that you are going to divest from law enforcement, you're going to divest from the militarization of law enforcement, that you're going to put money into poor communities. We're not hearing that right now. We're hearing a lot of jibber-jabber.
I know that Senator Bernie Sanders left the stage. But it should not feel easy to get our vote. You need to fight for our vote. And we need the media to be pressuring these presidential candidates and fighting for the people's vote.
Q: Are you going to be going after Republicans?
A: We'll be going after Republicans, sure. But we always go after Republicans. Right now we also have to be going after Democrats.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Ironically, they attacked probably their best ally on many of those issues, and their protests greatly limited his time for saying where he stands on these issues. Either not smart, or disingenuous. Let's see, where does Hillary stand on those issues? She is absolutely not as good as Sanders for them, this whole thing is a joke. And I see people saying "they DID protest Hillary", not really true as far as I know, I've heard about a 2007 incident at the Netroots predecessor (I forget its Kos name) but I don't think that was BLM protesting Hillary's positions on race issues. If I am wrong someone please enlighten me, specifics please. And anyway that was a much more minor incident in 2007, now we have a candidate who is not owned by corporate interests who needs all the support he can get.
If this group is for real, they need to focus their energy on Hillary, IMO, she is far ahead in the polls and not likely to go to bat for them on many of these issues.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)O'Mally was the "All lives matter. White lives matter" respondent. Sanders' response was "absolutely black lives matter."
But don't let reality get in the way of your hatred.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)I like Bernie a lot. I just don't revere him. He makes mistakes like everyone else.
http://time.com/3963692/bernie-sanders-martin-omalley-black-lives-matter/
After OMalley exited, Sanders took the stage and flashed with annoyance. If you dont want me to be here thats okay, he said. I dont want to out-scream you.
SNIP
Despite watching OMalley fumble, Sander immediately began with his prepared stump speech, criticizing the media and calling for a political revolution, trying to speak over the protesters. What are we doing here? he grumbled to Vargas, who was unable to control the crowd. Halfway through his time, Sanders looked at the protesters and finally said Black people are dying in this country because we have a criminal justice system that is out of control.
SNIP
Many of the African-American organizers at Netroots Nation complained that the conference prioritized economic inequality at the expense of racial justice.
We have to center this conversation around blackness and anti-blackness. We cannot keep disguising structural racism as income inequality, Angela Peoples, co-director of GetEqual and one of the hecklers, said afterward in an interview. What we saw at this conference was a lack of acknowledgement of movement for black lives.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Some article I saw quoted earlier wrongly asserted that Sanders also used the white lives matter too framing. I watched the whole thing and don't think he did that, I definitely recall him saying that black lives matter and not qualifying it.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)Did you see the video?
And then he talked about how he would help.
Stardust
(3,894 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)So when LBGQ supporters demanded the right to marry, was that a conspiracy?
The answer is, no.
These are not conspiracies. Equal rights are not a conspiracy.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)erronis
(15,250 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Not that I wasn't blown away by some of the reactions.
Because being heckled is a part of being a public figure. The affect on the candidates was minimal.
The cause they were supporting, however you may look at it, was real. It is a painful truth that needs to be addressed.
So everyone, stop being so protective of your candidate. They should be able to handle this with ease.
And hopefully, when there is a message attached to it, listen.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Bobbie Jo is a very aggressive poster in my opinion, always looking for a fight. I do not think you have anything to worry about, just give her a good rofl emoticon and be done with it.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Yeah, I am not worried.
As my father used to say, I don't suffer fools gladly.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Please,for the love of god,stop being so goddamned dismissive of anyone who doesn't bow at his feet.This isn't just about Bernie anymore,it's about the absolute tone deafness of some white liberals and it's having an effect out there.Stop this shit!
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Please provide some links. I have seen them used by lefties to describe certain pundits and talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh. I have never heard them using the terms to describe Democrats.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)It's dismissive language intended to shut down discussion. Period.
Well NOW you're seeing the terms used to describe Democrats. Right here, loud and proud.
Please provide some links, yourself.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)However, if you put race baiting and Rush Limbaugh, or any reich winger of your choice in Google you get pages of references from media sources.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)and take a look at what pops up.
Just never thought I would see it bandied about here without batting an eye.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)This is the old divide and conquer strategy that has worked for centuries. Monied classes have kept everyone else from noticing how awfully they are being exploited by pitting them against the other. And to make a strength into a perceived weakness - that's pure Rove.
I'm not really a 'star chamber' kind of guy, but if you trace this back to its disgusting origin and look under that rock, you'll find the Koch brothers.
villager
(26,001 posts)When "radical" environmentalism was picking up steam in the Reagan 80's, it worked well there, too.
Why not keep using that very old playbook when it guarantees that forces for change will keep shooting each other in the foot, and never get out of the starting blocks?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Ot always brings it home when the example is provided right at the perfect time.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)And there was a hell of a lot of defense going on for that poster who got the pizza.
That was depressing.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)he was effective so he had to go. The great purge..it's been happening here for years.
I'm not so fragile that a few insulting words will ruffle my feathers. We will continue uniting and the revolution Bernie is building, will, and does, include ALL of us!
This attempted smear will fail, has failed.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)when the canidate is more Democratic that theirs .
Indydem
(2,642 posts)You of course, mean a candidate who is NOT A DEMOCRAT, and has spent his whole political career not being a Democrat.
Even now, he is still Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
He is not a Democrat and the support of him on the DU ought to be a TOS violation.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)for Hillary people of New York didn't see her as a usurper not ever being a New Yorker before until she had a use for it .
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)independent. Thats the deal they struck. It's safe to sling that crap now.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)until I saw the behavior of some of his supporters here.
I still like Bernie, but there is a minority of them here on DU that are WAY fucking out of line.
"Cunning Stunt"
"whore"
I'm just flabbergasted.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I don't think most Bernie supporters would.
And it's not like some of the HRC supporters here aren't over the top, too.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)60. And by "Democratic"
You of course, mean a candidate who is NOT A DEMOCRAT, and has spent his whole political career not being a Democrat.
Even now, he is still Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
He is not a Democrat and the support of him on the DU ought to be a TOS violation.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)With your own rules. And talk to yourself.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)Not the liberal underground or the progressive underground. If anyone should start their own board it's the Bernie fans who are insulting Clinton left and right and essentially vowing not to vote for her because she's "the lesser of two evils."
qazplm
(3,626 posts)I think either candidate would be just fine. I think Bernie has been very admirable in not attacking Hillary.
I think a small but extremely vocal minority of his supporters have lost their fucking minds.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)It certainly does look that way. And has for some time.
Kevin from WI
(184 posts)At this rate we are going to end up with a Republican in the white house. I imagine things are only going to get worse here in the coming months.
hedda_foil
(16,374 posts)How about we all give each other a break, please, and try not to jump to the conclusion that one or two obnoxious posters are representative of a large group.
We are all going to have to come together after the primaries. Let's not make it so hard to do that we risk losing the presidency to a flying monkey.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)qazplm
(3,626 posts)but I will agree they are probably a minority of Bernie supporters...but gotta tell you they are a really vocal fucking minority and they are quite ridiculous at this point.
artislife
(9,497 posts).....it is a good example to how racism, sexism, misogyny and homophobia work.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)and thanks for the divisive and exploitative nature of your posts. Believe it or not, when I wrote the post I ended it with the colloquialism "I smell a rat", which was aimed at no particular person. It was probably a mistake to tack on the last bit in parentheses, as it of course appears personal. Whether you buy it or not, I apologize for creating that impression.
Edit: As always, my posts are mine alone. It is unfair to use anything one DUer says to paint an entire group, especially a group who support a progressive, equality loving, democratic candidate.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Or am I mixing you up with another zapped conspiracy post yesterday?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)One of these candidates will have to directly address the issue and offer solutions to the problem, or not a single one of these candidates will end up as president and a Republican will.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)I think it would be much more effective if the
BLM groups came up with their proposals and
confront the candidates with them.
Solutions come rarely from the top anyway, because
the people are ahead of them.
As I mentioned in another post: most police -
and criminal court issues reside with the power
of individual states, not with the Feds. Even
Obama cannot change that.
Stardust
(3,894 posts)democrank
(11,094 posts)I`m a Bernie supporter and I vehemently disapprove of this type of language.
ancianita
(36,055 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
artislife
(9,497 posts)That seems to be conveniently forgotten..
Response to artislife (Reply #68)
Name removed Message auto-removed
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)A poor choice of words, and completely out of place. Black lives do matter and what is happening right now to those kids at the hands of cops sucks.
As to the other, some guy said that because she takes money from bankers. That was a very poor choice of words.
But 'ratfuckers????' Geez.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I doubt anybody here thinks that black lives don't matter. Some of us believe the BLM group did themselves more harm than good by ambushing O'Malley and then not letting him answer their question. It was unfair to him and it was also unfair to the questioner, unfair to their leader (forget her name, was watching on the sly at work yesterday) and unfair to the rest of the people at the event.
Imo, they were winning until they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Had they tempered their demonstration by stopping it a few minutes sooner and allowing him to answer, they wouldn't have wrecked what could have been a really good moment for them, for O'Malley and for everybody in attendance or watching the video.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)Taking a strength and turning it into a weakness so support can be divided is straight out of the book of Rove. Divide and conquer.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)but it's not going to work.
London Lover Man
(371 posts)#BLM had a message to deliver in a process of democracy, and it was understood, and Bernie tried his best.
As for the other comment, I have no comment.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)posts on Clinton during this campaign. I no longer see dialogue here, so I'll just do what I do battling the Legislature in Raleigh for awhile and return later as things move forward. I might post videos or something or visit other forums but my time is valuable. I'd rather pass it doing something constructive.
libodem
(19,288 posts)Don't go. If you do hurry back. I'll bet you miss it.
Use ignore and hide a thread.
murielm99
(30,739 posts)supporters who are looking for honest discussion. This is not the DU I know and love.
I think you should stay, mmonk.
MineralMan
(146,307 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)interest in mind, have Barack Obama's policies helped minorities and woman ?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)were actually espoused by supporters of other candidates, right wing operatives, or paid Clinton people who were trying to get women to rally around the woman candidate and turn against Sanders.
In politics it's impossible to take anything at face value. They could fill textbooks with studies on the manipulation of the political process and the masses.
Response to Skwmom (Reply #27)
Name removed Message auto-removed
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wave, and don't say anything that might piss off already pissed off people, better to just wave & smile and wait for more .
Response to orpupilofnature57 (Reply #36)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Hekate
(90,683 posts)Just prove it.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)It's sexist and says a lot about those who use it.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)polls .
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Of course, your 12 year run here has nothing to do with anything. You just haven't paid attention.
For example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1329193
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10026986431#post1
If you use it, you're a joke.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)mean, and if that makes me a sexist why would I ask to be reinstated in the HOF thank goodness your Torquemada ass wasn't in on that or any other decision made here, so just keep taking your stickler bath .
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)It was used as ' being a sell out' or 'peddling or pandering' to Wall Street or the Banks. I missed the kerfuffle.
It's a long time tradition to feign outrage over the intentional misinterpretation over any word that might be connotated as a slam at the female gender.
'Bastards' would never get the same kind of traction.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Phrases like 'attention whore' where the intended meaning is not prostitute. Nor will you eliminate the word prostitute as an analogy to selling yourself out to a lobby or an institution.
Plus, I have nothing against the world's oldest profession or anyone who plys that trade. I respect the rights of anyone to make a living as long as it is entered into freely and of one'sown accord. Human trafficking be damned.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Response to SunSeeker (Reply #66)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)There is nothing "philosophical" about that vile, sexist post. None of the jurors who voted to keep it justified their decision.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #89)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Wow. Just wow.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #93)
BooScout This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #93)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Who the fuck do you think he was referring to?
And yeah, going to the lengths you're going to try to tell us we can't read and that post isn't saying what it's saying IS defending the post.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #99)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)I didn't say f.u., I asked who the fuck you think he was referring to. DUers are allowed to use "fuck" in that context. I notice you didnt answer my question.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #109)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Again, who do you think he was referring to as being a "whore"?
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #117)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Especially since you have no problem with the word "whore."
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #124)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Cha
(297,211 posts)Cha
(297,211 posts)jalan48
(13,865 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)... bullshit posts, especially this broad sweeping smear, but your "concern" has been noted.
Omaha Steve
(99,630 posts)OS
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)to smear everyone with.
That's the thing when you start waving around a paint brush full of shit, you get some on yourself.
"Bernie supporters" as you have defined the group, didn't do any of that shit.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)It's such bullshit, isn't it????
Right off the bat yesterday, we're all the little coded racist comments..."white Vermont" type crap.
SKINNER, you need to step in and BAN these bull racist attacks against any of the 5 candidates!
I'm gonna run out of room to block to all these people making such garbage attacks.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)not very smart. totally alienated me and even with a gun to my back wont vote for her now. You assume her supporters aren't doing it too. Everyone does it. Now get back to reality.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Even if she's the Dem nominee?
WIProgressive88
(314 posts)I WILL absolutely vote for Hillary should she get the nomination; there's far too much at stake should a Republican be allowed back in the Whitehouse, especially one from this crop of crazies. Still, the behavior of some of the Clinton backers certainly makes that thought difficult to stomach.
As far as the OP goes, I am behind Bernie 110%. I also support the BLM movement and have no problem with the way in which they sought to hold candidates accountable at Netroots. Bernie's record is as good as any other candidate when it comes to racial issues, but I find the criticism that he needs to do a better job of articulating his vision for racial justice to be completely valid. I did not see the post labeling the #BlackLivesMatter movement as "ratfuckers", but I find that description absolutely disgraceful, along with any posts referring to Hillary as a "whore." Disgusting. Terrible. No place for it on a progressive forum. Please stop painting all of us with such a broad brush due to the actions of a few; it only serves to alienate those whose support your candidate will need should she obtain the nomination.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)I would have liked the chance to hear O'Malley. It was O'Malley who was really cheated by the disorganization.
I do not blame Black Lives Matter. The program organizers should have made room for both their demonstration which is extremely important and for the O'Malley and Sanders speeches.
As it was, none of it came across well.
The reading of the names of the Black people who have lost their lives due to police violence is long and should have been read slowly so that the length of that list and the gravity of the killings sinks in.
Instead the real tragedy was overshadowed by the noise. Neither O'Malley nor Sanders is hostile to the Black Lives Matter movement, and thus, the effort to highlight the wrongs in our police state that are not limited to the killings of Black suspects but are particularly dramatic in that area was overshadowed by a controversy about the manner of the demonstration and not the righteousness of the Black Lives Matter movement.
The demonstration was unnecessarily hostile and loud. In fact, the problem that is causing the deaths of so many Black suspects or supposed suspects is part of a pattern that extends from those deaths (at the worst end) to intrusive surveillance and passes through excessive charges for minor tickets, maybe police quotas, the larges prison population ever, militarized police forces and police who do not answer to the voters.
All of these factors relate to serious problems in our society going right back to privatization and our unfair tax system that doesn't use enough of our wealth to fund education, mental healthcare, clean streets and communities and safe places for people to meet outside their homes among other things.
The Black Lives Matters group needs to be included in Democratic events in a respectful way and not just left to make noise that doesn't really communicate their message very well.
There should be no possibility of any distance or misunderstanding or anger between the Black Lives Matters effort and any of the candidates. The kind of disruption that occurred is understandable because of the frustration of the leaders of Black people in the face of so much violence. But Black Lives Matters needs to distinguish its friends from its foes and not just lash out at everyone.
I would have liked to have heard what O'Malley says to the issues raised by Black Lives Matter because both he and Bernie had some good ideas.
I don't know where the fault for the mistakes made lie -- with Netroots organizers or with Black Lives Matter organizers, but the demonstration should have been better planned so that the candidates could respond to it.
As it was, Black Lives Matters missed a chance to make a lot of friends and instead left a bad impression for many people. Not for me or the candidates, I am sure. But definitely for lots of the supporters of the candidates.
Has Black Lives Matters demonstrated at any Hillary events? Seems like that is where the more conservative Democrats who may be less aware of the Black Lives Matter movement are likely to be found. Seems like that would be the place to demonstrate.
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Needa Moment
(56 posts)A much better job toward removing that slimy mooch Clive Bundy from 'our protected land'. I really hope he pays the price one day soon
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)You are coming apart at the seams over a paid troll.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Apparently a good poutrage costs 2 cents.
dpatbrown
(368 posts)Those who speak trash about Clinton, how do you think Sanders would feel about you? Grow up. It's very possible that Clinton will be the nominee. Then what? I'm 100% for Sanders, but tearing down his opposition belongs to the GOP. I will support her 100% too.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)I did neither of those things. I suggest you place the people who did on full ignore, because you they are convincing no one of anything. If you have decided that we're all like that, I think you would do well to spend some time off DU. Real life can be fascinating.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Thanks Cali_Democrat.
barbtries
(28,793 posts)but i certainly hope that was just an outlier or 2.
i support Bernie, BUT
I am voting for the democratic nominee.
I like Hillary.
I like Joe Biden.
I am unfamiliar with O'Malley (did i get the name right?)
No candidate, no representative, no president will ever make me happy 100% of the time. It is not even realistic for me to to think one ever will. Hillary lost me in 2008 when she lied gratuitously. I don't like that Bernie supported arms manufacturers being immune to liability lawsuits. Bottom line i'm voting for the democrat every time and i will not fail to vote.
DinahMoeHum
(21,787 posts)Cuts more ways than one, sweetheart.
SunSeeker
(51,554 posts)Quite a patronizing, sexist tone. Where'd you hear that one, on Mad Men?
Paka
(2,760 posts)Do you equate all the trolls with the sincere Bernie folks that abhor rudeness as much as you? There are as many people out there trying to bring Bernie down as there are negative of Hillary. Don't trust everything you read. Those of us who genuinely support Bernie do not stoop to the lows you like to accuse us of.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)My guess is they are not Bernie supporters but trolls, except for the one guy who referred to Hillary in similarly misogynistic terms; he has been banned.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Hekate
(90,683 posts)Charming, but as an origin story for a slander it lacks certain something.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 04:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Starting with the OP, and continuing through the thread, there's been a lot of equating and conflating my words with those of other unsavory characters.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)And it's gone now
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)issues IS ratfucking: their Tweets are archived for all to see
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... malicious jerks regarding my support for Bernie, and I cannot believe they are anything other than paid trolls. Their belligerence is intended to elicit a similar response which, if you take the bait, will earn you a nice fat ALERT.
I would like to think that DU regulars are above such despicable behavior.
Bernie Sanders is one of my senators; I have met and spoken with him, and I've followed his career since he first ran for mayor of Burlington. I have disagreed with him on a few rare occasions, like basing the F-35 in Burlington, but I still respect him immensely.
The lowlifes that would Swiftboat him would be well advised to steer clear of my little patch of Vermont; I am NOT a pacifist, and I know how to apply a fist to maximum effect.
I have zero patience with such people.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)That some people won't support a candidate because they've seen a very small minority of that candidates supporters (and NOT the candidate themselves) saying things they don't like?
Convince me that that makes even a dribble of sense. No matter what candidate you're talking about. You're not voting for their supporters, for pity's sake.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)....a nice guy, probably even a mensch. He's an intelligent man. In addition to all of that -- he's been a politician most of his life.
For all of those reasons, he would not talk like that nor would he countenance his surrogates doing so. When the dust has settled, politicians of the same party will want to work together for common purposes, not survey a landscape of scorched earth on which nothing will grow.
I'm happy for the enthusiasm of the Sanders supporters around the country, but for the vocal toxic ones who dominate the dispute here, I'll say it again: you lost my support. And I'll say further: you couldn't be doing more harm to Bernie's cause if you were being paid to do so.
And since Skinner is giving you free rein to play just now, if any of you want to change the atmosphere, be my guest.
Cha
(297,211 posts)letting it stand on DU.
'Course there were many posters.. Hillary and Bernie supporters who excoriated him for his classlessness.
Well said, Hekate.
"When the dust has settled, politicians of the same party will want to work together for common purposes, not survey a landscape of scorched earth on which nothing will grow."
arcane1
(38,613 posts)If a single profane word from a single anonymous poster on a single website is all it takes to make someone stop supporting a candidate, then I doubt they ever supported them in the first place.
Your OP is pure fantasy.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)and flip on over in earnest.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Everything from calling him a "draft dodging socialist" to claiming he thinks we've "overcome racism".
Sancho
(9,070 posts)All the Democratic candidates need to recognize the recent shootings of unarmed blacks and the history of racism will require more than lip service.
Likewise, when you use offensive language and describe posters as whores, you are likely putting damage to your candidate. None of the 5 Democratic candidates deserve the personal attacks - all have good records as progressives.
In fact, all the "bash and trash" threads rarely change anyone's minds, especially when they are wild assertions and false premises with no real evidence.
I'm absolutely sure that ALL the Democratic candidates will modify their speeches, and even change their positions on issues as the primary continues.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)I have referred to no one in my entire life as "ratfuckers," and I have never referred to Hillary Clinton as "whore."
I AM a woman. I haven't alienated myself. I have done nothing to alienate any other minorities, either.
This OP is pathetic.
HFRN
(1,469 posts)False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.
doesnt have to be done by any other campaigns, even a lone troll can do a false flag
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Just think if Bernie would go away the Republicans will run for their lives, being she is so qualified and the Honest person to take the bull by the horns even when it's unpopular, right? Yeah right .
Number23
(24,544 posts)which we all know will go completely unheeded.
Ratfuckers is one of the nicer things these people have said about #BlackLivesMatter. I've seen posts from people here so mad they are *thiiiiiiis* close to calling them "thugs." Or worse.
So proud to have these people on my side.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Yep, went there...
Holy crap, people.
Number23
(24,544 posts)These people truly don't understand that they are NOT new and WE SEE THEM.
40RatRod
(532 posts)Cali_Democrat expressed my exact thoughts!
I was not even aware there was a forum just for Bernie (or Hillary, if there is one).
I have not been on DU long enough to understand all the rules but I am still trying to get educated.
I read every single thread and occasionally comment. That got me banned since I made a comment about how disgusting it was, IMHO, for us to trash each other's preferred candidate. I still find it disgusting and was even called a troll for my thoughts but hopefully, since this is not a Bernie forum, I won't get kicked off DU for saying this.
With that said, I will vote for the winner of the primary, whoever, but there is no excuse to attempt to divide us and with "trash" talk about a candidate to the point that we would actually consider taking our marbles and going home if our preferred candidate is not the nominee and then refusing not vote for the nominee which would make us a GOP voter.
I will consider it a badge of honor to support either Bernie or Hillary.
Worse yet, would be to encourage the running of a candidate as a third party if they are not the nominee, if our favorite does not make it. I am confident neither Bernie or Hillary would never consider that. Were we to have a third party (Can you say Ralph Nader whose division is responsible for the current tragedy in the Middle East right now, as much as the Little Texan and Darth Vadar some of us put into office by splitting our vote?)
Finally, the title of Cali_Democrat's thread was "Memo to Bernie supporters" I also saw another thread popup started by a Bernie supporter called "Memo to my Fellow Bernie Supporters" which seemed like an attempt to hi-jack Cali_Democrat's thread "Memo to Bernie supporters". If that was the purpose, then that is exactly my understanding of the OP's thread.
If I am wrong, then I apologize and ask forgiveness as a newbie I am still learning the ropes and understanding the feelings and positions of the prolific posters on DU.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)the groups are set aside so supporters can discuss issues and critics are not allowed. as of this time there are 127 people banned from the Hillary group and 58 people banned from the Bernie group. There is a place that shows the names and how many. I believe the Hillary group has been around much longer and that is probably why there are more banned there. You are just new and arent aware of how this place works yet! there's lots to obsorb!
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Taking advantage of INDIVIDUAL posters words and using them as smear against ENTIRE GROUPS of DU'ers (no less) to score political points is just as bad as using those individual words themselves to score points against other groups of DU'ers.
progressoid
(49,990 posts)I just did four different searches of DU and couldn't find anything referring to the #BlackLivesMatter movement as ratfuckers
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Try the Bernie thereads. Try berniesoblack thread.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I am a Bernie supporter I wouldn't lie. people referred to the interruptions by BLM as ratfucking.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)if posted by someone who is not one of the more prolific shit stirrers.
Just my two cents.