Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

iluvtennis

(19,858 posts)
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 04:56 AM Dec 2016

WI Recount Pics of ballots not counted by machines, but manual recounts is including

http://www.palmerreport.com/news/wisconsin-votes-uncovered-recount-counting-machines-missed/329/

(photos couldn't be taken of the actual ballots, so observers created these using sample ballots to show the type of votes that the machines missed and are now included due to the manual votes)

Voter wrote in name versus filling in the bubble
[img][/img]

Voter circled the name versus filling in the bubble
[img][/img]
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WI Recount Pics of ballots not counted by machines, but manual recounts is including (Original Post) iluvtennis Dec 2016 OP
Obvious examples of Russian hacking n/t MichMan Dec 2016 #1
No kidding FBaggins Dec 2016 #2
I thought we are the educated ones? n/t MichMan Dec 2016 #3
You'd be surprised at how creative people are DeminPennswoods Dec 2016 #4

FBaggins

(26,737 posts)
2. No kidding
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 09:33 AM
Dec 2016

Then there's this:

The author claims

In other instances, voters circled the name of the candidate they were attempting to vote for, because the instructions never did say anything about how they were supposed to mark the candidate they were voting for


Despite clear instructions right there on the sample ballot he uses add an illustration.

Are we down to hoping that thousands more democrats are unable to follow instructions than republicans?

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
4. You'd be surprised at how creative people are
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 01:29 PM
Dec 2016

when you don't want them to be. Years ago, I helped process forms for procurement quantities. The codes were few and simple, but there were always forms that had revisions with the codes in the wrong place or codes written wrong and what-have-you. That was why the forms had to be checked by a person before being sent for automated processing.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WI Recount Pics of ballot...