2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Bernie Sanders suspends, can he re-enter?
"The major political task that we face in the next five months is to make certain that Donald Trump is defeated and defeated badly. And I personally intend to begin my role in that process in a very short period of time."
Sounded to me like he will suspend in a "very short period of time" and work with Clinton.
If he suspends now, can he re-enter and get a roll call vote if Clinton was to drop precipitously in the polls?
k8conant
(3,030 posts)we national Bernie delegates are still for him.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)State delegations love to be on camera.
Happenstance24
(193 posts)Cruz was thinking about re-entering if Trump flopped a while back. If a Pug could, I can't imagine it being much different for Dems.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Sounded more like he's in it till the fat lady sings.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)the beginning of a defeat-Trump effort on a parallel track to Clinton while staying a candidate, but why not just suspend and say he reserves the right to re-enter if HC precipitously drops in the polls?
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)It's called multi-tasking.
Why should he suspend? What would he suspend?
The primaries are over. His campaign is now one focused on ensuring that the true progressive issues are addressed.
We suspect Trump would be an opponent in that. We know for certain that Hillary is not as progressive as she pretends.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)to ask them to switch (or to mount further campaign-style attacks against Clinton) - but that he reserves the right to take a last look at the situation in late July if any events result in a cratering of Clinton's support (?)
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)At least in the minds of her supporters.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)brooklynite
(94,541 posts)There's ALWAYS a roll call vote.
His supporters can even wear funny hats DURING the roll call vote.
randome
(34,845 posts)anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)I guess that depends on whether there's a challenge, a 'contesting', like I think I saw Jerry Brown and Ted Kennedy once made,
and maybe on whether the magic number has been reached without superdelegates (?)
brooklynite
(94,541 posts)...and it's ceremonial in that everyone knows how the Superdelegates will vote
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Candidates suspend their campaigns instead of ending them in order to reserve all rights. They retain control of their delegates and can resume the campaign at any moment, should the circumstances warrant it.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)If he wants a convention speech, his concession is required.
ETA: Ok, maybe not "never," but certainly not in the modern era.
Jackilope
(819 posts)Gawd forbid progressive ideas or things that millions of us want get spoken out. The wealthy don't like that kind of talk.
As a Democrat of 37 years, I do want to see an end to corporate purchase of our elected. The pipeline from pseudo public service to lobbying also undermines serving people vs wealthy corporate business. There are things very wrong and corrupt when you have trade bills being snuck in, promoting energy that puts our environment at risk, and Wall St. and banking under regulated.
Sanders caucuses with the Dems and is far more Democratic than some that enrich themselves with perks, power, and good "friends" that have long claimed themselves part of the party.
Currently Democrats today are moderate Republicans. Crap, Nixon had a more progressive list of goals than we do today.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)that 550-odd of the superdelegates could be persuaded to support him in an exceptional circumstance where Clinton suddenly lost a lot of public support?
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)They can resume anytime they want, technically Hillary resumed her quest for the democratic nomination that she suspended in 2008
Whimsey
(236 posts)if he does not concede before the convention. Contested conventions do not give a primetime speech to the candidates - just the winner.
I have a feeling Debbie Wasserman's removal is the sticking point. I think that is a really petty position of Bernie's and I will bet you it is coming from Jane. She strives to be the power behind the throne.
Jackilope
(819 posts)It is getting deep in here.
anAustralianobserver
(633 posts)Maybe DWS's leadership could factor into that, but I think he just thinks DWS is too right-wing and ethically questionable to represent the party.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)who feel that Hillary is too right wing.
She is definitely ethically questionable.
Debbie is just plain incompetent and might have been able to get Clinton the nomination but she's worthless anywhere else.
I guess you really didn't observe the changes in the states and congress these last few years?
Just who the f' did you think was in charge?
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)In fact, a few of his supers have gone over to Hillary (They're under the bus with "others" now I suppose).
But at this point, it's really about what the "presumptive nominee" Hillary does and what happens with HER from July 25th on.
Best of luck to Bernie in whatever he decides to ultimately do however moving forward into the fall and beyond