Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No One in America Should Have to Wait 7 Hours to Vote (Original Post) JackN415 Nov 2012 OP
couldnt agree more. nt seabeyond Nov 2012 #1
LOL! Good luck with that. boingboinh Nov 2012 #2
there are repubs in office because dems don't vote in off year elections!!!!! sammytko Nov 2012 #15
those responsible should be criminally prosecuted for interferring with the vote. hollysmom Nov 2012 #3
Its time to have an "Arab" Spring with those in power & responsible.... Historic NY Nov 2012 #4
Or worry about their election being stolen. nt Comrade_McKenzie Nov 2012 #5
Its called voter supression Thrill Nov 2012 #6
Is there an organization taking this on? Like moveon? nm rhett o rick Nov 2012 #7
If I understand correctly any law can only be enacted that effects a federal election. LiberalFighter Nov 2012 #8
The US goes around the world promoting democracy and ... JackN415 Nov 2012 #9
I have toddlers and I could NOT wait 7 hours. If I was a retired 60 year man, I could. faithfulcitizen Nov 2012 #10
If I have to take my special need child along, forget it... JackN415 Nov 2012 #12
Isn't this related to limited polling places during early voting? godai Nov 2012 #11
yes, but why should this be? why make voting difficult? how much is the extra cost.. JackN415 Nov 2012 #13
They've been much worse before. redqueen Nov 2012 #17
Needed more voting machines at the limited polling places. godai Nov 2012 #20
... redqueen Nov 2012 #14
It's like the Third World GCP Nov 2012 #16
Exactly... Why can't our elected officials protect our right to vote? Why is this important aspect midnight Nov 2012 #18
Yup there needs to be 1 standard and an independent nonpartisan agency to handle US elections. craigmatic Nov 2012 #19
 

boingboinh

(290 posts)
2. LOL! Good luck with that.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:11 AM
Nov 2012

If anything expect new laws to build on them as success stories by the gop. And as history shows the dems won't put up much of a fight. What baffles me is why do all of these states have so many republicans in high office? The problems seems that democrats don't tend to come out for local elections as much as they do during generals.

sammytko

(2,480 posts)
15. there are repubs in office because dems don't vote in off year elections!!!!!
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:49 PM
Nov 2012

They need to vote all the time.

Historic NY

(37,462 posts)
4. Its time to have an "Arab" Spring with those in power & responsible....
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:24 AM
Nov 2012

they need to be called out, dragged out, and voted out.

LiberalFighter

(51,388 posts)
8. If I understand correctly any law can only be enacted that effects a federal election.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:41 AM
Nov 2012

But that doesn't mean that any federal law regarding elections can't influence states to comply with state and local elections when a federal race is also involved. Federal elections are held every 2 years. Require that a voter is able to complete their ballot within 3 minutes. Require that a polling place cannot have over 1000 voters or require that there should be x number of voting machines for every x amount of voters. And they shall be used.

 

JackN415

(924 posts)
9. The US goes around the world promoting democracy and ...
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:43 AM
Nov 2012

the conservative media would be vociferous about voter suppression etc.

"Democracy, a great thing you should have it," unless it hits the RW power. Then they turn to be the Brown Shirts.

faithfulcitizen

(3,191 posts)
10. I have toddlers and I could NOT wait 7 hours. If I was a retired 60 year man, I could.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 09:46 AM
Nov 2012

It's a damn shame. I think the President is going to win, but this is a DAMN SHAME that so many people will not be able to vote for this reason.

godai

(2,902 posts)
11. Isn't this related to limited polling places during early voting?
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 10:24 AM
Nov 2012

Won't things be a lot better tomorrow?

 

JackN415

(924 posts)
13. yes, but why should this be? why make voting difficult? how much is the extra cost..
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 11:08 AM
Nov 2012

for more early polling places? it means one can reduce the number of polling places on the election day to compensate the cost, as the total number of registered voters is the same. Even if it costs more, it's worth tax payers' money.

godai

(2,902 posts)
20. Needed more voting machines at the limited polling places.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

TOMORROW - No One Should Have to Stand in Line for 10 Hours to Vote

...and I don't expect that, anywhere.

redqueen

(115,108 posts)
14. ...
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:46 PM
Nov 2012
...

This is happening not because of a natural disaster or breakdown in machinery. It is happening by partisan design. Alarmed by the strong Democratic turnout in early voting in 2008, Republican lawmakers, including Governor Rick Scott, reduced the number of early voting days from 14 to eight. When the restrictions were challenged in federal court under the Voting Rights Act, a three-judge panel said they would have a discriminatory impact upon minority voters. But only five of the state's 67 counties are covered by the federal civil rights law.

When the remaining restrictions were challenged in federal court, a George W. Bush appointee said there was no proof that the reduced hours would "impermissibly burden" minority voters. How many hours in line must a Florida voter wait before the burden upon her becomes an "impermissible" one? If Florida's election officials, and its Republican lawmakers, and its state and federal judges, all were required to stand in line for seven hours to vote those long lines would go away forever. You know it, I know it, and so do those officials.

How about Ohio, another "battleground" state governed by partisan fiat. Its election rules are administered by a secretary of state, Jon Husted, who just a few years ago was the GOP speaker of the state house. Like their counterparts in Florida, Ohio's Republican lawmakers sought to restrict wildly popular early-voting hours around the state. And again the federal courts blunted the impact of their new rules. So what has Husted done? He's focused his energy this weekend ginning up ways to justify discarding provisional ballots cast by his fellow citizens.

These are just two recent examples. There are more. But they all have a few core things in common. In each instance, elected officials are making it harder for American citizens to vote and to have their votes counted. And in each instance, the partisan restrictions are designed to impact the elderly, and the poor, and students. The Constitution gives power to the states to handle elections. But what we are seeing is one party's systemic abuse of that power to disenfranchise likely voters of another party. Don't believe me? Let's go to the videotape.

...


K&R

GCP

(8,166 posts)
16. It's like the Third World
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 01:24 PM
Nov 2012

Thanks to repuke secretaries of state. They should be jailed for obstruction of the vote.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
18. Exactly... Why can't our elected officials protect our right to vote? Why is this important aspect
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 01:40 PM
Nov 2012

of our community involvement so derailed... It's because the private corporations have taken it over, and make us pay for all their special software, computer hackers, and their machines... That is the only reason the one percent allow the govt. to exist.....

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No One in America Should ...