Another Brilliant Analysis on Why Trump Will Beat Clinton

[MrMickeysMom]

Michael Krieger | Posted Tuesday May 24, 2016 at 10:37 am, Max Keiser's Liberty BlitzKrieg

A Clinton match-up is highly likely to be an unmitigated electoral disaster, whereas a Sanders candidacy stands a far better chance. Every one of Clinton’s (considerable) weaknesses plays to every one of Trump’s strengths, whereas every one of Trump’s (few) weaknesses plays to every one of Sanders’s strengths. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, running Clinton against Trump is a disastrous, suicidal proposition.

Read more at http://www.maxkeiser.com/#eLO

[highprincipleswork]

1. This is really good. Basically "abstraction" will lose, "embodied" will win. Bernie would do bettter

[Demsrule86]

32. A gold schill?

"WHO is Max Keiser. He refers to 9-11 being a hoax, he exposes the “black boxes” of non accountable controlling banks, even the controlling nexus, the Bank of International Settlements, and shouts very loudly about their perfidy, blackmail, “financial terrorism”, theft from taxpayers, “unconscionable huge bonuses stolen from taxpayers”, the IMF causing trillions of dollar global debts, their “economic hitmen”, which are the same people as Goldman Sachs, and other Wall Street banksters. He is permitted to rake them all over the coals. Why? But he doesn’t mention the Rothschilds, the nexus, who control the Bank of International Settlements.

Max promotes a gold standard, to turn back the tide to some kind of “honest free and fair, entrepreneuring Capitalism“, because he “loves his USA and its Constitution.” In that respect, he’s a Rhino, as he should realise, in all his expertise, that that is not the way the World is going at all!

The World –inevitably– is gonna go Socialist, a global Socialist super-state with a One World Currency, whatever that is going to be based on. The Euro? Special Drawing Rights? Or gold, silver and commodities? We shall see."

I am so impressed (not ) with this guys opinion. I wonder how many people lost their shirts in gold listening to his nonsense...no doubt he is a Trump...funny how you all keep posting this stuff which only serves to help Trump...Bernie lost. No matter how many pro-Trump articles you post, that won't change...especially with this kind of guy.

[highprincipleswork]

50. You guys love to beat up the messenger, no matter what the message. You must be lacking in friends.

And if not that, certainly in wisdom.

Simply a form of narrowmindedness and hatefulness really.

At the same time you ignore anything of value in what was said, either by the quoted author, the poster or myself. Instead, you like to live in the bubble of your alleged reality and all-knowing wisdom. There simply is no having a conversation with you.

These are not good traits. They are not even good traits for survival.

[emulatorloo]

54. No, it is simply a matter of checking out sources before embracing them.

Last edited Wed May 25, 2016, 01:38 PM - Edit history (6)

I'm not too enamored with OP's wingnut cartoonist, but if you like him enjoy!

Here's his latest:

"Note: You may reprint this cartoon provided you link back to this source."
Here's the link http://legalinsurrection.com/tag/a-f-branco/





http://legalinsurrection.com/tag/a-f-branco/

Some blasts from the past:

[Blue_Tires]

2. Ah, yes...

I was wondering when I'd find today's "Arizona should have gone to the Super Bowl instead of Carolina because they would have beaten Denver handily" - hot take...

Just another RT/Bitcoin/ZeroHedge nutbar who is anti-Clinton so of course he gets posted here (and called "brilliant" to boot)...

[OilemFirchen]

4. Yup. Just SAW another ZEROHEDGE OP.

Early assertions that Berniacs were both indistinguishable and, in many cases, inseparable from Paulites were absolutely correct.

[TwilightZone]

9. Agreed.

Some of their sources are even the same. Like this one.

[procon]

3. Max Keiser ? Oh, do a facepalm!

We joke that you lot can't find fresh Hillary hate stories without squeegeeing crud from rightwing websites... and here you are! There are forums that debate his rightwing conspiracy theories and he's quite popular with Alex Jones fans. He boasts that he's some sort of financial guru even he went to drama school and only briefly worked part time on Wall Street, but he recommends buying gold because... the end is nigh!

C'mon... didn't you get even a teesy bit suspicisous when he says stuff like "Trump’s (few) weaknesses"???

[Dem2]

7. Thanks for the rest of the story

"Brilliant"

[MrMickeysMom]

15. Actually Max Keiser is a pretty reliable source for all things financial...

So, he's an excellent source on the two biggest detriments to everyone's financial future.

I agree with him.

[dlwickham]

26. he's on the Putin News Network

a reliable source for commentary and news

[MrMickeysMom]

37. I don't think many would rightfully know this...

Since you don't watch it, I don't get RT, and he was around before it, which is why I know it, but you would not, because you can only match it to Putin... Talk about tripe.

[snowy owl]

56. Good people on Putin network: hartmann, schultz . . . the two I watch. Beats sitcoms all day and nig

But clearly many people prefer prefer sitcoms to understand politics and being informed. Which is why we are becoming the richest country in the world in the hands of the fewest people with what is becoming one of the lowest standards of living in modern world. Think Flint before answering.

[Demsrule86]

33. hahah

yeah well, I am not with a 9-11 truther and a gold shill.

[MrMickeysMom]

38. Thank you for kicking my post with kindness and love

Kicked again!

[Demsrule86]

40. Welcome

You should check out people...and not accept simply articles you agree with..discernment.

[MrMickeysMom]

42. Had you read the post I asked you to, you would see that I do...

I've been following Max Keiser since the 1990's when he spoke on "The Oracle" each week. He worked in Wall Street in the 80's and has been analyzing first hand the experience of what casino type trading has done all these years, due to de-regulation. He and his co-host and now wife continue a program that is used on RT (which I do not get, but all of us can visit on the internets). I've gone to his website, "The Keiser Report" for years since.

Check out people? You should maybe take your own advice.

Thanks for kicking my post again!

[Demsrule86]

49. And your point is?

The guy is a gold shill...and 9-11 Truther...so I don't care how long you listen to the guy...he is not an expert on anything. I see no point in your post other than to broadcast your hatred of Hillary and your indifference to the fact that 30 years of progressive work will be wiped out should Trump win ( and you sure sound like you are rooting for Trump) and pack the courts...and you scraped the bottom of the barrel with this guy in my opinion. Bernie Sanders is one guy who lost a primary...not a good reason to destroy the progressive movement.

[Demsrule86]

34. He is a gold shill

and you really should check people out before you accept their word on anything...he and has probably bankrupted more people than Trump with the gold scam...he worked on Wall Street briefly by the way and has no credibility. And, he is a 9-11 truther and a Trump supporter...scraping the bottom of the barrel here.

[MrMickeysMom]

39. See post #37...

and, thanks for kicking my post!

Kicked again!

[Demsrule86]

43. Yeah not so much

Do you know how much money people have lost buying gold while they wait for the coming apocalypse...this guy rakes in cash from the gullible, and I find that disgusting.

[MrMickeysMom]

44. You obviously don't listen to the Keiser Report...

Nice try, but that is not what this guy is about. He also interviews guests from all financial walks of life in the entire world of finance, but the first part of his program is to discuss real financial news. The second part of his show is where guests come TO his talk about things you'd never had heard of, unless you work in the world of finance. E's even had numerous people tout bitcoin. You want to say now that I believe the news about bitcoin? Nice swing and a miss there...

Anyway, thanks again for kicking my post!

[Demsrule86]

48. Of course not

I don't listen to shite like that...I don't listen to Alex Jones either.

[blm]

60. The writer is Michael Krieger, a Rand Paul supporter trolling left

to increase his 'buy gold' audience.

[LonePirate]

6. Maybe not advocating for Trump but certainly a questionable source (Keiser) to be sure.

Keiser's a RWNJ judging by his other blog posts. It must be one of those "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of situations here.

[TwilightZone]

10. Or maybe just some people who can actually read.

Obvious Ron Paul wannabes aren't terribly reliable.

[MrMickeysMom]

16. Ain't it the truth?

I don't even need a crystal fucking ball

[Demsrule86]

35. That is obvious

Of course these sort of posts show the poster is advocating for Trump.

[TwilightZone]

8. Uh, that guy's a libertarian hack. The next story down is "A $68 trillion ‘Biblical’ collapse...

"A $68 trillion ‘Biblical’ collapse is poised to wipe out millions of Americans…”

Did you even look at the site before you posted this tripe?

[MrMickeysMom]

18. Tripe...

That's MY word, Twilight... You're copying a phrase that I USE a lot to describe real crap.

I've been listening to the Max Keiser since he was on that show, "The Oracle" in the late 90s. It's linked to his website, so who gives a shit about the Biblical piece.

[TwilightZone]

21. This *is* real crap.

Tripe is perfectly descriptive.

Your assertion that "tripe" is YOUR word is one of the most presumptuous I've ever seen on DU. Congrats. Thanks for letting me know how seriously to take you in the future.

[MrMickeysMom]

22. Yes... why don't you

Ignore is a good thing, and I give you permission.

[barrow-wight]

30. So you own "tripe" now?

That's some real, um, I don't know, tripe?

[MrMickeysMom]

36. Yes...

Would you like to rent this sign?

[blm]

61. Michael Krieger is a RandPaulbot trolling the left to increase his BuyGold audience.

They see the left as fertile territory during heated primaries.

[JaneyVee]

11. If you think this is a "brilliant analysis", youre doing it wrong.

Even the cartoon is from a rightwing hack.

[MrMickeysMom]

19. Why don't you look up something...

You're really good at that.

[zappaman]

12. !!!

[bettyellen]

13. Are you going to switch all your assets to gold too, Mom? HA HA HA.

The sources here are fucking incredible. Scraping the bottom of thee RW barrel.

[MrMickeysMom]

20. Why thanks, bettyellen!

That's right nice of you!

[bettyellen]

23. It is really not nice to post from absolute nut job RW sources here- this will only be allowed for a

few weeks longer at most, so FYI. Skinner is just disgusted by this RW nutter crap, and so am I.

[MrMickeysMom]

24. You take a position of authority without having any of it...

What nerve you have act like you're an authority of suitable material as to who is better positioned to win over Drumpf. That shows a lot of arrogance with your comrade comment to anyone that insinuates anything pointed out like this is not to be tolerated but, "for a few weeks longer". Do you hear yourself?

If you find the notion that Hillary will be easily defeated by Drumpf so offensive, then perhaps you should look into the reason anyone would say this on a Democratic Discussion Board. The entirety of it stares you right in the face. You don't need to deal a characture to judge the acceptability of the message. What is this? Are we in the novel, 1984?

Ignore is your friend.

[bettyellen]

29. What? "You don't need to deal a characture to judge the acceptability of the message" Huh?

:Are we in the novel, 1984? " Nope, but you posted bullshit from a bizarre CT libertarian source. Maybe you don;t remember when DU had standards, it has been a few years.
They are coming back.

[Demsrule86]

41. It is offensive

as is offering right wing crap sites as evidence.

[hill2016]

14. this is not an analysis

this is an opinion piece

[99Forever]

17. And a lovely picture of the "front-runners" to boot.

Perhaps a little too flattering though.

[oasis]

25. "Another brilliant analysis". Our local DU talent can match your guy

word for word. Why go to strangers?

[JoePhilly]

27. Sounds like a nutjob's bedtime prayer.

[StayFrosty]

28. The misogyny just oozes

From them

[newrevolution]

31. I agree

[NCTraveler]

45. The only thing brilliant is this guys ability to make people think his points are brilliant.

RT, truther, gold pusher.

[MrMickeysMom]

46. You, I see, don't read either...

... but thanks for checking in and kicking my post!

[NCTraveler]

47. But I do read.

It's how I know whose opinions I'm reading. You just went out of your way to be wrong. Lol don't think for a second that your respect for right wing propaganda pushers is contagious.

[blm]

51. MichaelKrieger's NOT brilliant, he's a RandPaulbot trolling left to add to his 'buy gold' audience.

Last edited Wed May 25, 2016, 01:47 PM - Edit history (3)

The opportunistic fraudsters like Krieger sure are doing a number on the left using the primary as an easy cover.

[emulatorloo]

53. +1

Why are people so damn gullible?

[blm]

59. They WANT to push RW narratives, imo. They WANT the RW validated by the left's own idiocracy.

And they are proving it every day. NONE of my fellow Sanders supporters in real life act like some of the idiocracy here, so it certainly seems like RW trolls are succeeding at their job here at DU.

[Faux pas]

52. Not to change the subject

(but I am lol) LOVE LOVE LOVE the toe stretching kitten pic! I'll be smiling all day over that one, thanks MrMickeysMom!

[imagine2015]

55. K & R

[Cosmocat]

57. Let's be clear about this POS OP

Those caps ...

The one on Trump (the republican nominee) has his word for word campaign slogan that he repeats a dozen times in between endless stupid and hateful sentences.

The one on Hillary (the presumptive democratic nominee) is something she has never remotely said, and a clear negative frame.

This is posted on democratic underground.

And, this OP stands because?

[emulatorloo]

58. Wingnut cartoonist, see more of his "Brilliant progressive" work above.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512044390#post54