Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:02 PM May 2016

Hillary's cheating caught on camera in Nevada (Coup by corporations and Military Industrial Complex)



This is a coup by the corporations and the Military Industrial Complex.

As you can see clearly, a motion for recount is placed before the chair. A male comes and whispers something to the woman because Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.

In response to the male command, she ignores the motion for a recount and claims that there is a motion to change the rules.

The entire crowd shouts NO but she claims the motion to change the rules has passed!

This is now out in the open. Gadhafi and Saddam Hussein had better Democratic processes than Hillary Clinton.

The Clinton family has subverted the Democratic process and reduced America into a banana republic. This is coup in the making and very shameful.




200 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary's cheating caught on camera in Nevada (Coup by corporations and Military Industrial Complex) (Original Post) egalitegirl May 2016 OP
Caucuses are hardly democratic n/t SFnomad May 2016 #1
So you agree DLC is not Democratic? egalitegirl May 2016 #3
Re: Hillary and her cohorts in the DLC created the caucuses. SFnomad May 2016 #4
They must've been some powerful hallucinogens! nt puffy socks May 2016 #32
"Hillary and her cohorts in the DLC created the caucuses." TwilightZone May 2016 #16
My guess is the person won't be old enough to vote for a couple of Presidential elections n/t SFnomad May 2016 #22
It's just mind boggling! puffy socks May 2016 #37
I had a chat on another site with a BS supporter that didn't know that the CPC existed. TwilightZone May 2016 #70
Maybe it's puffy socks May 2016 #91
Well, they're all sellouts, dontcha know? TwilightZone May 2016 #95
That is not a caucus. LiberalFighter May 2016 #90
Nevada is a caucus state n/t SFnomad May 2016 #99
Nevada is only a caucus state for the purpose of determining how many delegates LiberalFighter May 2016 #110
The caucuses were Democratic until Hillary CoffeeCat May 2016 #106
Hillary won Nevada creeksneakers2 May 2016 #130
The establishment has everything to do with election problems. cui bono May 2016 #149
+1000 chwaliszewski May 2016 #153
Oh please! bkkyosemite May 2016 #126
Duplicity Is As Duplicity Does cantbeserious May 2016 #2
Wow, nenagh May 2016 #5
Kick for visibility felix_numinous May 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #7
WHAAAAAAAA??????? That is nuts. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #8
People screaming "no" during the vote for "aye" scscholar May 2016 #9
I defy anyone to tell without a db meter, even with the cross vote. SusanCalvin May 2016 #11
Motion should be for recount egalitegirl May 2016 #18
How Can ANYONE Support THIS Egregious Behavior! CorporatistNation May 2016 #120
Right. Really mind boggling. bjo59 May 2016 #147
Go Bernie liberal from boston May 2016 #194
I wonder who that man was that whispered something in her ear? Uncle Joe May 2016 #10
That's what I was wondering too. Who is he and what did he say? jillan May 2016 #24
He obviously told her to ignore the motion for recount egalitegirl May 2016 #25
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #38
K & R AzDar May 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author jack_krass May 2016 #13
Coup, taking orders from men, is just funny Progressive dog May 2016 #14
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #21
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #53
This was clearly a take over from the party. sadoldgirl May 2016 #15
Some consolation in knowing what's coming...if either Oligarch "wins" in November... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #46
Gowanus, Brooklyn Depaysement May 2016 #55
A thing of beauty and wisdom! pdsimdars May 2016 #167
Deja vu all over again hellofromreddit May 2016 #17
Wow they are acting like republicans. B Calm May 2016 #19
Whatdaya mean acting? -none May 2016 #72
Wow..what corruption. CentralMass May 2016 #20
Bernie people lied and cheat to get those delegatate last time Demsrule86 May 2016 #23
So according to you, 2 wrongs make a right, right? elleng May 2016 #33
haha Don't give me that Demsrule86 May 2016 #124
I disenfranchised no one, and I sent no letter, nor did I act in a sleazy manner. elleng May 2016 #127
You defend what other supporters of your candidate did: they behaved dishonorably Demsrule86 May 2016 #140
Here comes the self-righteous finger wagging... chwaliszewski May 2016 #154
Who cheated when the original caucus was held? Samantha May 2016 #36
Hillary worked hard to win Nevada Demsrule86 May 2016 #123
Kindness and love with a post like that????? What planet do you hail from. shraby May 2016 #43
Planet reality Demsrule86 May 2016 #122
How did they cheat? RichVRichV May 2016 #103
Fraudulent letters were mailed and you know it. Demsrule86 May 2016 #121
Couple things about that letter. RichVRichV May 2016 #125
It was mail by a Sanders supporter working there, she sent a correct email to Sanders supporters seabeyond May 2016 #133
Once again, prove it! RichVRichV May 2016 #142
that is not true...the woman who did it was fired... Demsrule86 May 2016 #141
The head of the credentials committee Christine Kramar was ousted for partisan reasons. RichVRichV May 2016 #144
Do you deny she helped trick Hillary voters and steal votes? Demsrule86 May 2016 #157
I already disproved it. Look at post 142. RichVRichV May 2016 #162
Baloney Demsrule86 May 2016 #191
So now you're trying to claim she sent them the wrong times. Where do you get your information? RichVRichV May 2016 #196
Showing up is lying and cheating now? bjo59 May 2016 #148
sometimes Demsrule86 May 2016 #158
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
So your angst is based on yourbelief that women must be subservient to men? procon May 2016 #27
I don't know the youtube account holder either egalitegirl May 2016 #31
It's not genuine. George II May 2016 #39
The question is not whether the video is genuine, procon May 2016 #45
No idea why it is added egalitegirl May 2016 #75
WTF? tammywammy May 2016 #28
Plus a freaking million. And a jury of simpletons left this rot, 3-4 Number23 May 2016 #61
Plus about a billion. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #65
Well you do always agree with me in MIRT. Agschmid May 2016 #83
Nope. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #86
You caught me. Agschmid May 2016 #88
LOL. greatauntoftriplets May 2016 #89
I'll add to this +etc mcar May 2016 #92
Are you a fellow Southerner? moriah May 2016 #114
You see a video with that kind of dishonesty and all you can do is find fault with that? pdsimdars May 2016 #168
Bless your heart. tammywammy May 2016 #177
Remember, here's looking at you. pdsimdars May 2016 #184
... tammywammy May 2016 #185
Results of jury service Travis_0004 May 2016 #29
Good to know hardcore misogyny is allowed so long as the side in power posts it Dem2 May 2016 #49
+1 BootinUp May 2016 #105
And that's pretty much all you need to know about the current state of DU. TwilightZone May 2016 #59
Just look at all the rec's. sheshe2 May 2016 #66
Juror #7 deserves a medal. Serious props but as usual, the sane and reasonable are outnumbered Number23 May 2016 #63
Three cheers for Juror #7.....n/t Henhouse May 2016 #77
Yes mcar May 2016 #93
I am juror #7. I can't believe this tripe was allowed to stand. Maru Kitteh May 2016 #146
Not only allowed to stand but rec'd over 100 times. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #165
FYI... Bobbie Jo May 2016 #132
I think jurors like that #7 should be removed from the jury pool. pdsimdars May 2016 #169
Seriously fucked up beyond belief... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #30
I don't see Hillary there ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #34
It's disgusting how the OP says it like that. nt fun n serious May 2016 #35
Misogynist hate is allowed if the Bernie jury allows it Dem2 May 2016 #50
The poster may be a troll but the number of recs and the jury decision is beyond belief...nt Henhouse May 2016 #78
The fact that people endorse the 'unknown' if it agrees with their biases Dem2 May 2016 #80
I don't know.... Henhouse May 2016 #97
All the whinging about TOS violations and character assasination is par for the course though Dem2 May 2016 #102
I agree Demsrule86 May 2016 #160
BS juries will allow ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #116
I'll grant that I've surely missed a few Dem2 May 2016 #118
Oh, there's all kinds of ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #128
I expect bitterness, childish accusations, rendering of clothing etc. Dem2 May 2016 #131
Well, it's the internetz ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #134
The Lolita one was way worse... Demsrule86 May 2016 #137
They really need life experiences related to this before giving their opinion. LiberalFighter May 2016 #81
The worst display of sexism and misogyny I've seen here mcar May 2016 #94
+1 BootinUp May 2016 #107
"Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men."? Henhouse May 2016 #40
This clearly shows Demsrule86 May 2016 #159
I don't even know when I took that wrong turn that ended me up in the Free Republic! Squinch May 2016 #41
Ummm... Wtf? Agschmid May 2016 #42
Inviting Barbara Boxer was an open Provocation. NewImproved Deal May 2016 #44
So, you don't like Hillary, you don't like Barbara Boxer, blue neen May 2016 #47
Pretty Old Testament... JSup May 2016 #56
. blue neen May 2016 #64
lol..n/t Henhouse May 2016 #79
sounds about right to me. grasswire May 2016 #58
I like the quote in your sig line. blue neen May 2016 #67
of course grasswire May 2016 #68
Actually, my research shows that this quote is attributed to Frederick Douglass. blue neen May 2016 #76
I'm sorry. Yes, of course. Brain blip. nt grasswire May 2016 #113
Nina Turned spoke for Bernie and Boxer for Hillary today. Trying to Diss Boxer for riversedge May 2016 #87
Oh, for petey sake--it was a short lived marriage and have been divorced at least 15 YEARS!. riversedge May 2016 #96
They've been divorced for 15 years. TwilightZone May 2016 #98
more family values pdsimdars May 2016 #170
This OP is a hot mess. Bobbie Jo May 2016 #48
No kidding rockfordfile May 2016 #51
Yup. Agschmid May 2016 #52
As usual, you are far too kind. Jury left it 3-4 too. I was not the first alerter or dare I say, Number23 May 2016 #62
54 recs and counting... Bobbie Jo May 2016 #74
Anyone doubting the fictional nature of the word "democratic" in Democratic party needs to see this. pa28 May 2016 #54
Proving even a self-professed "egalitegirl" can be a nasty misogynist. pnwmom May 2016 #57
MOAR TINFOIL ASAP! JaneyVee May 2016 #60
Don't need to read posts to know corruption wins when it favors clinton. Sad. So sad. snowy owl May 2016 #69
They are proud and don't 840high May 2016 #71
I often wonder what it will take for them to FINALLY have the scales fall off their eyes. pdsimdars May 2016 #171
We need primaries. apcalc May 2016 #73
Just was reading about this on Raw Story...they have many videos about it up as well. One Black Sheep May 2016 #82
Oh--you get the award for having the craziest post of the day. What a bunch of BULL riversedge May 2016 #84
That!! nt Jitter65 May 2016 #85
And the ratfuckers have taken over, when you quote Trump and say such vile synergie May 2016 #100
And yet the same exit poll you like to quote shows Bernie doing 8 points better against RichVRichV May 2016 #108
Um, sure, because it's WVa. synergie May 2016 #115
You are lieing through your teeth. RichVRichV May 2016 #117
Sorry, but I leave that to RWers and their tools. synergie May 2016 #145
Respond to post 142 if you have the guts. RichVRichV May 2016 #164
Sorry, but again, the facts are that BSers simply did not follow the rules synergie May 2016 #186
Hahaha, save the condescending bullshit for someone else. RichVRichV May 2016 #188
Your post is rather offensive and crazy you know. Suggest BootinUp May 2016 #101
"because Hillary's women...cannot think for themselves and take orders from men" TwilightZone May 2016 #104
+ 1 JoePhilly May 2016 #174
You seem to be projecting again, egalitegirl Loki May 2016 #109
I cannot wait til bullshit like this is no longer allowed here at DU. nt cry baby May 2016 #111
So here's what actually went down, the dishonest op is not telling the truth here. synergie May 2016 #112
It always is the same with the Bros. 1) Fuck up because you are not prepared or you don't understand Squinch May 2016 #150
Now they are throwing "turn into a violent mob" into the mix! synergie May 2016 #155
Kick for the laughs! zappaman May 2016 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author Bonobo May 2016 #152
She won Nevada. OhZone May 2016 #129
I'm surprised there hasn't been violence yet. Jester Messiah May 2016 #135
I don't think I would want to make this a big deal Demsrule86 May 2016 #136
You sound silly Corporate666 May 2016 #138
Meanwhile, back on planet Earth............ johnp3907 May 2016 #139
What this is is something generally referred to as "course correction" Tarc May 2016 #143
This seems to be corruption, pure and simple. If they play it this way, this year is toast for Dems. highprincipleswork May 2016 #151
I have an issue with your post Demsrule86 May 2016 #156
The Us vs Them thing knows few bounds, and when power is involved, well... HereSince1628 May 2016 #161
The 110 people who rec'd this sexist bullshit can never again deny the existence of BernieBros and JTFrog May 2016 #163
Schadenfreude...the Germans got it right Il_Coniglietto May 2016 #166
If she is the nominee she will lost to Trump. It's almost a given. pdsimdars May 2016 #173
Nope! Il_Coniglietto May 2016 #176
Horse shit! You think Latinos and AAs won't come out to vote? leftofcool May 2016 #179
The ISSUE ?????? pdsimdars May 2016 #172
"The author was deeply offended" TwilightZone May 2016 #175
Fraud caught right on video felix_numinous May 2016 #178
someone in the middle of a crowd of very loud bernie supporters Florencenj2point0 May 2016 #180
While the commentary the OP used is terribly unfortunate.... Buddyblazon May 2016 #181
Ugh. Typical of what's to come....nt Land of Enchantment May 2016 #182
What a pile of bullshit. Aerows May 2016 #183
The only ones getting fooled here cagefreesoylentgreen May 2016 #187
I didn't realize Hillary was in Nevada recently. Seems strange since their primary is over. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #189
Another troll bites the dust after getting 130 rec's on a disgustingly sexist OP. JTFrog May 2016 #190
Aaaaaaaaand, it's banned. PeaceNikki May 2016 #192
The disgusting troll has now been banned. tammywammy May 2016 #193
She was propping up Trump and I called her out. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #197
Can someone do an AtA about the 134 rec'ers of this moronic garbage? Number23 May 2016 #200
Any change in the agenda first requires a motion to suspend the rules BainsBane May 2016 #195
Crooked is as crooked does and she will be a crooked Pres if elected. MaeScott May 2016 #198
Thank you Donald Trump Beaverhausen May 2016 #199
 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
3. So you agree DLC is not Democratic?
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:07 PM
May 2016

Hillary and her cohorts in the DLC created the caucuses. Don't blame Bernie for it. You just admitted that the Democratic Party leadership is not Democratic.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
4. Re: Hillary and her cohorts in the DLC created the caucuses.
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:10 PM
May 2016

What kind of drugs are you doing? Caucuses have been around for a lot longer than Secretary Clinton and the DLC. They didn't "create" them.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
37. It's just mind boggling!
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:01 PM
May 2016

A few days ago I came across a post where a BoB supporter said he didn't believe in the SCOTUS argument . It was a stupid reason to vote for Hillary"
I explained that Ruth Bader Ginsburg was probably going to retire or pass away and obviously Scalia will be replaced soon,

and they said, "Who the 'F' is Ruth Bader Ginsburg?"

TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
70. I had a chat on another site with a BS supporter that didn't know that the CPC existed.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:55 PM
May 2016

Even though Bernie's a member. After I explained what it was, the poster still didn't believe it because "Bernie's the only progressive in Congress".

That being said, not knowing who RBG knocks that one out of the park.

 

puffy socks

(1,473 posts)
91. Maybe it's
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:15 PM
May 2016

because the progressives in the CPC are running from Sanders?
https://gobling.wordpress.com/2016/02/04/when-progressives-run-from-bernie/


A ton of his supporters really believe "Bernie's the only progressive in Congress" and that no one else has ever fought for Progressive legislation since FDR or Kennedy.
It's a slap in the face to all the progressives who have been raked over the coals by the GOP i.e. corporate America's representation in Congress.




TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
95. Well, they're all sellouts, dontcha know?
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:21 PM
May 2016

They kind of lost me when they proclaimed that John Conyers was a sellout, but had no idea who he was or what he'd done. That was almost as good as declaring Planned Parenthood part of the establishment.

I think a lot of them are political neophytes, so they're mostly unaware of anything in the political arena prior to Sanders deciding to run for president.

LiberalFighter

(51,388 posts)
110. Nevada is only a caucus state for the purpose of determining how many delegates
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:15 PM
May 2016

each candidate receives that go to the national convention and the delegates that will vote on it.

It is at the convention just as in states with primary elections that they decide the delegates that go to the national convention.

Just because a state uses a caucus for their elections doesn't make state party conventions a caucus too. They serve different functions.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
106. The caucuses were Democratic until Hillary
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:44 PM
May 2016

got her mitts on them. Now they're corrupt as hell. Her little flying monkeys will do cheat however they can and exploit the system a million different ways.

Caucuses used to be transparent, open and smoothly run. In 2008, with record participation--no problems in our Iowa caucuses. Smooth as silk.

This year, with a 30 percent drop in attendance, it was a shit show on steroids. Because that's how you cheat. Create chaos, wreak havoc and you can get away with stealing it all.

What a joke our entire primary has been. One shit show after another--state after state. Rigged caucuses, voter suppression, not enough voting machines, "clerical errors", voter suppression, disappearing registrations, 6-hour voting lines, exit polls that don't match the election results.

Investigations in Arizona, Illinois, New York and Delaware is being looked at now.

What a travesty. How did we get so far down this rabbit hole?

creeksneakers2

(7,486 posts)
130. Hillary won Nevada
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:19 AM
May 2016

by a very slim margin. Subsequently, I read a celebration here of Bernie winding up with more delegates than she did at a Nevada convention. The Sanders supporters were fine with that. They loved it.

Now things are getting even crazier.

Are you implying Hillary had anything to do with election problems? That's ridiculous if you are.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
149. The establishment has everything to do with election problems.
Sun May 15, 2016, 05:05 AM
May 2016

And we know who they don't want in power.

.

Response to egalitegirl (Original post)

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
11. I defy anyone to tell without a db meter, even with the cross vote.
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:24 PM
May 2016

It was too close for a voice vote.

 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
18. Motion should be for recount
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:29 PM
May 2016

First fraud is that the motion for recount was ignored. It was placed BEFORE the male commander instructed the female puppet to ignore the motion and replace it by another motion.

Please discuss this fraud before obfuscating the discussion with the second fraud.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
147. Right. Really mind boggling.
Sun May 15, 2016, 04:12 AM
May 2016

People there reported that even Hillary delegates were angry. That a freaking travesty. And then the images of the brown shirted police all lined up at the front of the stage after she suddenly closed down the convention and ran out.

194. Go Bernie
Mon May 16, 2016, 02:57 PM
May 2016


Last night I watched live coverage of a young woman whose Nevada family is involved in Democratic Party explained what was happening. IMO, everything happened quickly & when announcement was made she said so sadly we just saw an election stolen. Interesting that she is a Bernie supporter but her father (who is a former Congressman} supports Hillary. She said her father was disgusted, ripped up his ballot & walked out. Any DU member also see this??
 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
25. He obviously told her to ignore the motion for recount
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:38 PM
May 2016

and replace it with a motion to change the rules to favor Hillary. No idea who he was but must be one of the Clinton team's operators who decided on the spot how to counter the motion for recount.

Response to Uncle Joe (Reply #10)

Response to egalitegirl (Original post)

Progressive dog

(6,933 posts)
14. Coup, taking orders from men, is just funny
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

The Gadhafi and Saddam Hussein bit is hilarious. I'm wondering if you think that Bernie would talk that way if he dared or if you just don't have a clue about the country you live in.

Response to Progressive dog (Reply #14)

Response to Post removed (Reply #21)

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
15. This was clearly a take over from the party.
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

They are not even ashamed of showing it out
in the open!

Now the reaction will set in, and the party will
not like it.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
23. Bernie people lied and cheat to get those delegatate last time
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:35 PM
May 2016

Good for Hillary and her supporters to beat them at their own game.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
124. haha Don't give me that
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:06 AM
May 2016

You disenfranchised the voters...minority voters at that...which make it particularly reprehensible. A wrong has been righted...Hillary won...you should not have send letter and acted in such a sleazy manner.

elleng

(131,410 posts)
127. I disenfranchised no one, and I sent no letter, nor did I act in a sleazy manner.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:11 AM
May 2016

2 wrongs do NOT make a right.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
140. You defend what other supporters of your candidate did: they behaved dishonorably
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:29 AM
May 2016

and disenfranchised voters...I can tell you think it was wrong and you are right. Terrible thing to do and when you consider...many of the voters were minority voters...it makes it worse...so called Democrats stealing votes from minorities... in a cruze- like manner...horrible.

chwaliszewski

(1,514 posts)
154. Here comes the self-righteous finger wagging...
Sun May 15, 2016, 07:03 AM
May 2016

I don't have the patience to point out all of the sleaziness your candidate and her ilk have pulled that apparently you're okay with. Maybe Hillary was flawless until she had to dodge that sniper fire in Bosnia back in the '90s.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
36. Who cheated when the original caucus was held?
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:57 PM
May 2016

Sanders was unquestionably polling much better than Clinton right up until the actual caucus. Harry Reid rode into town that Wednesday to save the day. He called one of his "friends" who controlled a very large business and asked him to let his workers off to go to the caucus and vote for Hillary. They were given the time and ran over and said they were there to vote. It was overwhelming. They were allowed to vote, and to speed things up for those who were not registered, they were handed the registration sheet, told to fill it out afterwards and turn it in. In other words, many of those people who voted were not even registered when they did.

Sam

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
123. Hillary worked hard to win Nevada
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:05 AM
May 2016

She won fair and square... sorry what you did was wrong and now that wrong hopefully has been righted. The people that vote deserve to have their vote respected...never has any Democrat ever done this...I don't think any GOP did it before Cruz.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
122. Planet reality
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:02 AM
May 2016

Stealing votes is a terrible thing to do ...especially from minority voters who fought for 100 years for the right. You think you are so clever...haha...you showed Hillary and all...but what you did was wrong period...and you should be ashamed. You claim your candidate is so honest and all...I sure didn't see that in Nevada.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
103. How did they cheat?
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

Hillary delegates didn't bother to show up. That's on the Hillary campaign not Bernie's. He didn't write the rules (the state party with the backing of the DNC did), and he and his supporters followed the rules as written. So how did they cheat?

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
121. Fraudulent letters were mailed and you know it.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:59 PM
May 2016

But here is the thing...I don't care what tricks you employed or how clever you thought you were ...those were real voters who had a right to have their votes count. What you did was morally reprehensible...and can not be defended.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
125. Couple things about that letter.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:08 AM
May 2016

1) It was mailed by the state party, not Bernie supporters.

2) Bernie supporters got it also, they simply chose to ignore it and show up anyways.

3) The letter didn't lie. It stated that if you registered your presidential preference would be counted (regardless of showing up to the actual caucus). That was the truth. It specifically says so in the Nevada State Delegate Selection Plan (which are the rules the state caucuses follow). It specifically said people could register on the Friday before the convention and that was the requirement for having their votes counted for presidential preference. Page 8, 2a. The letter was completely truthful.



Learn the damn rules of the party before you start arguing things!

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
133. It was mail by a Sanders supporter working there, she sent a correct email to Sanders supporters
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:29 AM
May 2016

telling them they had to show, she admitted it and was fired, it was a group effort of Sanders supporters.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
142. Once again, prove it!
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:36 AM
May 2016

You are doubling down on your lies. Prove the accusation. Once again the email was factual.


Here is the email in question:




And here is the rules that it pertains to:

a) Exact registration times shall be set by each county’s respective convention committee. However, each convention committee shall be directed to open in-person registration for no less than three (3) hours between 4:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. on Friday, April 1st; and no less than two (2) hours prior to the convention’s call to order, while remaining open until 12:00 p.m. Where practicable, the Nevada State Democratic Party encourages county parties to use online pre-registration beginning up to 30 days prior to the county convention date. However, the use of online pre-registration does not exempt or mitigate the requirements for in-person registration set forth here.


f) Delegates to county conventions shall be considered to have aligned with a preference group when they are registered for the convention. A delegate shall be required to designate his or her preference group at the time of registration. A delegate who refuses to designate a preference group shall be registered by the Credentials Committee as uncommitted.


That is directly from the Nevada Democratic Delegate Selection Plan, pages 8 and 9.

Hillary didn't lose Clark county because her delegates were lied to and didn't show up to the convention. She lost it because too many of her delegates didn't bother to register at all! The alternates were seated because there were not enough registrations (from Friday or Saturday) to fill all the spots. Even Bernie's registrations rates were down for the convention, just not as bad as hers. Unlike the round one caucuses, the convention count for presidential preference were done via registration forms, not hand counts.



And finally if Christine Kramar was such a lying cheating person, why did even the Hillary supporters on the credentials committee join her in the protest when she was ousted? Because it was a partisan move by the Hillary campaign to gain an upper hand and completely against the rules as outlined. it had nothing whatsoever to do with cheating.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
144. The head of the credentials committee Christine Kramar was ousted for partisan reasons.
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:48 AM
May 2016

Her removal had absolutely nothing to do with any emails sent to delegates. The charge was sharing confidential emails with the Bernie campaign (totally different emails than the ones discussed here). The charge was ludicrous on it's merits. Anything going through the credentials committee had to be non-partisan and shared with all sides.

Even the two Hillary supporters on the credentials committee acknowledged that and protested her ouster with her.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
157. Do you deny she helped trick Hillary voters and steal votes?
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:40 AM
May 2016

and acted in an unprofessional manner? We all know she did it and deserved to be fired...and possibly prosecuted.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
162. I already disproved it. Look at post 142.
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

I'm sure you'll ignore it. Hillary supporters are great at ignoring any evidence that goes against your bias, no matter how obvious it is pointed out.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
191. Baloney
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:25 AM
May 2016

She sent a letter with the wrong time on it to Clinton people...she was lucky she was just fired...could have been prosecuted. FACT...Hillary Clinton won the Nevada caucus. FACT 2...Bernie supporter tried to overturn the primary...FACT3 They were stopped cold and are crying because they were not allowed to cheat. FACT4 Those few votes are meaningless for Bernie as he has lost the primary and all the bad behavior won't change that.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
196. So now you're trying to claim she sent them the wrong times. Where do you get your information?
Mon May 16, 2016, 08:30 PM
May 2016

Brock Nation Review?


Since you once again provided no evidence I'm going to presume this has to do with the email sent to delegates you keep going on about (which was sent by the party, not by any Bernie supporter). If there is another letter you are speaking of please provide a link to it.

Now here's a copy of the dastardly email in question:




Now here is a direct quote from the Nevada Democratic Delegate Selection Plan, page 8, 2a.

a) Exact registration times shall be set by each county’s respective convention committee. However, each convention committee shall be directed to open in-person registration for no less than three (3) hours between 4:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. on Friday, April 1st; and no less than two (2) hours prior to the convention’s call to order, while remaining open until 12:00 p.m. Where practicable, the Nevada State Democratic Party encourages county parties to use online pre-registration beginning up to 30 days prior to the county convention date. However, the use of online pre-registration does not exempt or mitigate the requirements for in-person registration set forth here.


Oh look everything in that email follows the state parties rules on when registration is supposed to happen. The 3 hour mandatory registration time on Friday was met. The 2 hours before convention convened on Saturday was met. The keeping registration open until noon on Saturday was met. The dates were correct. Once again, the email was truthful. No one was lied to. Bernie supporters didn't cheat. Large numbers of Hillary supporters just didn't bother to register for the second round. That's why they lost it.


I know I'm not going to ever convince you know matter how obvious the evidence is. You're stuck in your bubble and locked into bias overload. However I won't let you set the narrative with a pack of lies that you can't even attempt to back up.

Response to egalitegirl (Original post)

procon

(15,805 posts)
27. So your angst is based on yourbelief that women must be subservient to men?
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:43 PM
May 2016

That's what I see from your writing:
Men give commands.
Women cannot think for themselves.
Women don't take orders from men.

Welcome back to the 60s, and from there you proceed to make an unfounded allegation based on a whisper that no one could hear. Again, there's nothing here that provides any inkling that there is some "coup by the corporations and the Military Industrial Complex". None of the claims you've made appear any any other credible news reports. Which leads to the conclusion that this OP is just another fiction based on a Youtube video by some blogger named Alexander Higgins, famous for... I dunno what.

 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
31. I don't know the youtube account holder either
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:52 PM
May 2016

I was watching another video on youtube and at the end of it, youtube automatically started playing this one. That is how I came to know about it. I immediately thought it would be something people here would be interested. I don't think it is a hoax simply because we do not know the person who posted it. Do you really think the video is not genuine?

procon

(15,805 posts)
45. The question is not whether the video is genuine,
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:24 PM
May 2016

but more about credibility. You say you know nothing about this blogger. It happens that his anti-Hillary meme nicely fits in with your own confirmation bias, but why is this unknown blogger's added editorial commentary, "Crooked Hillary Election Fraud", a valid conclusion? It isn't at all apparent what was happening from that clip with the really bad audio pickup.

There's also your own subjective opinions about women in general and a total fabrication about a nonexist coup and Banana Republics, all because Bernie fans disagreed with something... like maybe because they lost the vote count, who knows. There is no coups in the works, just winners and losers, but you based your comments on nothing more than a visceral reaction to this short video snippet.

 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
75. No idea why it is added
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:01 PM
May 2016

I pasted the link and nothing more from the link into the original post. I did not even intend it to be displayed as a video because I thought it required special code. I thought it would show up as a link. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised that it showed up as a video because I used to wonder how to do that sort of thing!

I have no idea how the editorial commentary you mention shows up stamped on the video. The original does not have it stamped on the video! So it must be how DU processes youtube links. I do notice that the commentary is below the video on the original page but I did not notice that part when I posted it.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
28. WTF?
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:46 PM
May 2016
A male comes and whispers something to the woman because Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.


Bless your heart. I don't want the hide for saying what I really think.
 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
168. You see a video with that kind of dishonesty and all you can do is find fault with that?
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:39 AM
May 2016

I find myself questioning people's value systems more and more with tone deaf statements like that.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
177. Bless your heart.
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:43 AM
May 2016
Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.


I find myself questioning people's value systems more and more with tone deaf statements like that.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
185. ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 03:31 PM
May 2016
Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.


I find myself questioning people's value systems more and more with tone deaf statements like that.
 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
29. Results of jury service
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:50 PM
May 2016

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sat May 14, 2016, 08:17 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Hillary's cheating caught on camera in Nevada (Coup by corporations and Military Industrial Complex)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511961872

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Ghadafi and Saddam Hussein are better than Hillary, and "Hillary's women" can't think for themselves and take orders from men. So much fail in this post.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat May 14, 2016, 08:25 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: What. The. Hell?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: A more hateful pile of excrement could not be found outside of a Tea-Party porta-john. Sander's fans, you need to call this kind of garbage out when it comes from those walking among you, pretending to be your own. No progressive or Democrat would post this kind of bullshit.

TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
59. And that's pretty much all you need to know about the current state of DU.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:39 PM
May 2016

Anything goes, as long as it's pointed the right direction.

Maru Kitteh

(28,348 posts)
146. I am juror #7. I can't believe this tripe was allowed to stand.
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:49 AM
May 2016

The pure, seething misogyny alone should have been sufficient enough to start handing out pizza slices.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
132. FYI...
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:26 AM
May 2016
Going forward if we see anyone voting to leave the worst-of-the-worst posts, or voting in a nakedly partisan fashion to hide posts which are clearly legitimate, then we will remove that person's ability to serve on juries. (We are not going to provide any notification to members who lose their jury privileges, because under the messed-up values of primary season we think many of you would see it as some kind of badge of honor.)


Skinner

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1013&pid=5098

Just sayin'...



 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
169. I think jurors like that #7 should be removed from the jury pool.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:42 AM
May 2016

They don't have the judgement, discretion or mental discipline to be ruling on anything. Look at that unbalanced explanation.

Can someone put a stop to this kind of mind being on juries? It should be done.

NanceGreggs

(27,821 posts)
34. I don't see Hillary there ...
Sat May 14, 2016, 08:54 PM
May 2016

... so I'm wondering how she got "caught cheating".

" ... Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men."

"In response to the male command, she ignores the motion ..."


Sexist much?

If the women who support Hillary "take orders from men", why aren't they all taking their orders from Bernie? Last I heard, he is of the male persuasion.

That "woman who cant think for herself" is on her way to the presidency of the United States, the most powerful position on the planet. She seems to think for herself rather well.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
50. Misogynist hate is allowed if the Bernie jury allows it
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:29 PM
May 2016

This is the most vile thread I've seen allowed on any forum in years.

Edit: right-click and google the subject of this thread, then look at transparency. That's all I'm going to say.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
80. The fact that people endorse the 'unknown' if it agrees with their biases
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:07 PM
May 2016

...is quite concerning to me. What's happening here?

Henhouse

(646 posts)
97. I don't know....
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:24 PM
May 2016

I get asked to serve on a jury a few times a day when I'm online. I'll agree to serve but if I feel I that I can't be objective I'll cancel my decision to serve.

How anyone could rec this OP or vote to leave it shocks the hell out of me.

I'll be glad when this primary business is over....

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
102. All the whinging about TOS violations and character assasination is par for the course though
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:40 PM
May 2016

It's distasteful, but it's politics - this is the time when it gets rough.

But this misogyny from a questionable poster is something else...

NanceGreggs

(27,821 posts)
116. BS juries will allow ...
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:31 PM
May 2016

... anything as long as it's pro-Bernie and/or anti-HRC. Anything.

What's really mind-boggling is that this is NOT the most vile thread I've seen here. I've seen some that are actually worse.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
118. I'll grant that I've surely missed a few
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:53 PM
May 2016

How does something so blatant that was likely alerted on several times not get a review? ... perhaps it will eventually?

But of all the things to promote after all the accusations of misogyny in the recent past, it seems illogical to recommend this thread.

Politics sucks sometimes.

NanceGreggs

(27,821 posts)
128. Oh, there's all kinds of ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:14 AM
May 2016

... "illogical" going on around here - and it's been going on for months.

A lot of people who "doth protest too much" when they are accused of being misogynists, or racists, or sexists often "rec" OPs that are literally dripping with any or all of the above.

Funny that, huh?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
131. I expect bitterness, childish accusations, rendering of clothing etc.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:19 AM
May 2016

But I don't expect those who claim to have the moral and ethical high ground staked out (obviously this is hilarious in it's own right, but so be it) to promote this sort of low-brow misogyny. I'm sure many are commenting indirectly by not commenting, but the bigger person isn't afraid to take on their own side when they've veered too far to one side. Nobody wins in a gutter fight.

NanceGreggs

(27,821 posts)
134. Well, it's the internetz ...
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:29 AM
May 2016

... where what people claim to be and who they really are can be very different things.

But then a thread like this one comes along, and who people really are - and what views they really hold - becomes apparent.

Despite all efforts not to do so, some people just can't help "outing" themselves in the end.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
137. The Lolita one was way worse...
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:14 AM
May 2016

That was the last straw...I blocked those that posted that filth. I never blocked anyone before.

LiberalFighter

(51,388 posts)
81. They really need life experiences related to this before giving their opinion.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

They likely know nothing about Roberts Rules what is included in bylaws for major organizations. Especially when it involves a convention. Like using a parliamentarian. I bet the man was that person.

Henhouse

(646 posts)
40. "Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men."?
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:10 PM
May 2016

I should have stopped reading this screed right after "military industrial complex" but I'm a gluton for punishment.....

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
159. This clearly shows
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

the jury system is rigged in favor of Bernie supporters but the party is almost over. I never had anyone on ignore. But I put the worst of them on ignore...including the Lolita one. Honestly, it is almost over but this should never have been allowed.

Squinch

(51,090 posts)
41. I don't even know when I took that wrong turn that ended me up in the Free Republic!
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:18 PM
May 2016

I thought I was going to Democratic Underground, but this is some serious, ignorant, conspiracy monger, fact-free, tea-bagger shit right here.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
42. Ummm... Wtf?
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:19 PM
May 2016
A male comes and whispers something to the woman because Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.
 

NewImproved Deal

(534 posts)
44. Inviting Barbara Boxer was an open Provocation.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:21 PM
May 2016

She is not only a Clinton Machine hack of several decades, but she is a Clinton in-law---her daughter Nichole is married to Hillary's brother, Tony Rodham. One big cozy Oligarchy...

[link:|

blue neen

(12,335 posts)
76. Actually, my research shows that this quote is attributed to Frederick Douglass.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:02 PM
May 2016

Suffragist. Abolitionist.


"Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are people who want crops without ploughing the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of its many waters. The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

Thank you.

riversedge

(70,464 posts)
87. Nina Turned spoke for Bernie and Boxer for Hillary today. Trying to Diss Boxer for
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:12 PM
May 2016

speaking for Hillary is so wrong.

riversedge

(70,464 posts)
96. Oh, for petey sake--it was a short lived marriage and have been divorced at least 15 YEARS!.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:23 PM
May 2016

Bringing that marriage and posting a pic of them --into this this thread just shows how Desperate you are. Shame on you.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
62. As usual, you are far too kind. Jury left it 3-4 too. I was not the first alerter or dare I say,
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:42 PM
May 2016

the last.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
54. Anyone doubting the fictional nature of the word "democratic" in Democratic party needs to see this.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:35 PM
May 2016

Shameful display.

pnwmom

(109,025 posts)
57. Proving even a self-professed "egalitegirl" can be a nasty misogynist.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:38 PM
May 2016

"Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men."

Sounds like projection to me -- from someone taking orders from men.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
69. Don't need to read posts to know corruption wins when it favors clinton. Sad. So sad.
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:51 PM
May 2016

And this is what you are all proud of?

One Black Sheep

(458 posts)
82. Just was reading about this on Raw Story...they have many videos about it up as well.
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016
Violence erupts at NV Democratic convention amid tensions between Clinton and Sanders supporters

The Democratic convention in Nevada turned violent on Saturday, with at least one fight breaking out, according to video posted Twitter users who were in attendance.

Tensions were high between supporters of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), the Las Vegas Sun reports. They apparently spilled over on the state convention floor.

People can be seen scuffling, and a woman says into a microphone, “We need a medic in the front, a medic in the front.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/violence-erupts-at-nv-democratic-convention-amid-tensions-between-clinton-and-sanders-supporters/
 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
100. And the ratfuckers have taken over, when you quote Trump and say such vile
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:35 PM
May 2016

things as you try to defend BS's attempt to violate the will of voters, you proclaim what you are. Those WVa stats of all those Trump supporters who voted for Bernie really don't seem to be much of an anomaly at all.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
108. And yet the same exit poll you like to quote shows Bernie doing 8 points better against
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:51 PM
May 2016

Trump than Hillary does in WV. Imagine how much it would have been without the Trump supporters interfering.

We'll ignore the 15% of Hillary's vote that were from Republicans in that same exit poll.

While I don't condone the rhetoric from the op I understand the anger behind it. What is happening in Nevada is blatant in our face cheating. The difference between you and I is that I would be angry at this even if it favored my candidate. What is happening in Nevada is just wrong.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
115. Um, sure, because it's WVa.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:28 PM
May 2016

Full of angry white men who prefer other angry white men over a woman supported by a black man they hate.

How about we just ignore the fact that WVa is pretty conservative and voted against Obama too?

Sorry, but the "anger" behind it is pure hate and pure RW idiocy, you guys don't seem to understand the anger behind those of us who are listening to this misogyny from people pretending to progressives. What happened in Nevada is that Bernie supporters were prevented form blatant in your face cheating to steal a contest that Bernie lost. They lost seats by not following basic rules. the difference between you and I is that I don't condone RW hate, misogyny or cheating by people too dumb to follow simple rules.

I'm quite angry about what's happening in Nevada, I was angry when BSers pulled this crap in IA, and in that other NV convention. I'm just not excusing any of it when it's one candidate that's being slimed and cheated against by the people who are doing all the cheating and the sliming and ALSO accusing others falsely of their own actions.

This what CONS do. Look at the actual facts here and watch the videos with out the RW edit, and then see if you can manage to dredge up some anger since what your candidate's followers are doing should enrage and upset anyone who thinks democracy is something that's to be valued and for whom misogyny and RW hate is unacceptable no matter how much "anger" one feels about being thwarted from violating simple rules.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
117. You are lieing through your teeth.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:40 PM
May 2016

Bernie and his supporters never cheated in Nevada. There isn't one shred of evidence they ever did. Hillary delegates didn't show up is what happened. All rules were followed by Bernie supporters. You are lieing to cover for the blatant caught on video cheating that is happening today by the state party to hand the win to Hillary.

I dare you to provide one shred of evidence that Bernie or his supporters cheated in any way in Nevada. Back up those lies with proof. You can't and we all know it.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
145. Sorry, but I leave that to RWers and their tools.
Sun May 15, 2016, 02:35 AM
May 2016

There is more evidence of BS dirty tricks than HRCs. Yeah, when you tell the HRC delegates something false about when they're supposed to show up, but it's BERNIE's lies, that's not cheating on BS's part because his purity burns through any of the lies?

You're the one that's being dishonest here, with your numerous non-factual statements.

You just admitted what happened, but we know you can't figure out why you just exposed what happened, but we know you can't admit it, truth is hard for RWers and BSers apparently, but vile smears are so very easy, so that's what you engage in.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
164. Respond to post 142 if you have the guts.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:00 AM
May 2016

It shows you're lying. The rules for running the caucuses are printed for the world to see. There was no cheating by Bernie, his campaign, or his supporters. The same can't be said of the state party or Hillary campaign.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
186. Sorry, but again, the facts are that BSers simply did not follow the rules
Sun May 15, 2016, 03:46 PM
May 2016

and as usual are belligerent, demanding and dishonest. If you had the guts or the brains you would understand simple facts, but apparently reading rules and complying with them us just not something that you have the guts to do. There was cheating by BS last time, his campaign and his supporters deal with everything that does not go their way by getting aggressive, violent and dishonest as your post shows. The party is not cheating you, nor is HRC, you are just LOSING. People are not buying BS. Yelling at us, screaming at us, threatening us and pulling dirty tricks to steal delegates you did not win simply is not working. Gave the guts to face reality, it shows you are lying, and too terrified to accept why or how.

You have a nice day now, and do try to get a grip all this anger and dishonest ranting is not good for your health, and you have so much more disappointment ahead of you and more losses you need create total fiction to explain, since we know you are too frightened to deal with things like math and reality.

RichVRichV

(885 posts)
188. Hahaha, save the condescending bullshit for someone else.
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:25 PM
May 2016

You're a typical Hillary supporter who ignores evidence as it's presented to you because it goes against your bias. I proved the email sent to the delegates was in fact truthful. I even quoted the paragraphs that proved it and linked to the official delegate selection plan written by the Nevada state party and approved by the DNC. I linked proof that the delegate email wasn't why the Hillary campaign got Christine Kramar sacked. It was because she passed an email from the Hillary campaign that they considered confidential (ignoring that she had a responsibility to provide all material to all campaigns in order to do her duties in an unbiased manner), had nothing whatsoever to do with the delegate email you like to go on about. That delegate email is one big fat red herring. I even showed that the two Hillary supporters on the credentials committee backed Christine Kramar when she was ousted.


You haven't proven any part of your argument. All you've got is accusations and innuendo that you "know is true" because you "just know it's true". You can't provide one shred of evidence to show it's actually true.

BootinUp

(47,221 posts)
101. Your post is rather offensive and crazy you know. Suggest
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:39 PM
May 2016

you think about editing out the slur against women at a minimum. Its this kind of stuff that not only affects how you are viewed here but also other BS supporters and the campaign itself.

As far as how many yeas and nays there were, clearly there were both, and watching that video is not a good way to determine which side prevailed.

TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
104. "because Hillary's women...cannot think for themselves and take orders from men"
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

Wow, I have no idea why some people think that some of Bernie Sanders' supporters are sexist.

None at all. I have no idea what could possibly give them that impression.

Loki

(3,825 posts)
109. You seem to be projecting again, egalitegirl
Sat May 14, 2016, 10:56 PM
May 2016

Men whispering in women's ears and telling them what to do? Must happen at your home regularly, but there would be hell to pay if it happened at mine. You don't know Jack when it comes to Democratic women, and it doesn't surprise me.

 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
112. So here's what actually went down, the dishonest op is not telling the truth here.
Sat May 14, 2016, 11:21 PM
May 2016
https://twitter.com/RalstonReports/status/731683071058042881

The delegates didn't follow the basic rules, and thus they failed the credential check, their personal failures, not someone plotting against them.

Squinch

(51,090 posts)
150. It always is the same with the Bros. 1) Fuck up because you are not prepared or you don't understand
Sun May 15, 2016, 06:37 AM
May 2016

the process. 2) Blame Hillary and "the oligarchy" 3) whine loudly and bring a specious lawsuit 4) Lose.

Response to zappaman (Reply #119)

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
135. I'm surprised there hasn't been violence yet.
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:37 AM
May 2016

This kind of shit... it kind of leaves that door hanging open.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
136. I don't think I would want to make this a big deal
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:10 AM
May 2016

You cheated first and that sort of makes Bernie look really bad. It looks to me like tonight was fair and just...definintely.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
138. You sound silly
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:19 AM
May 2016

I'm sorry, whining about "corporations and the military industrial complex" just totally eliminates any credibility your complaint may have.

Regardless of whether either of those things are bad - they have NOTHING to do with this situation. Conflating the two simply tells me you are unable to make a cogent point and are just flinging shit at the wall, hoping something will stick. Or you have so little respect for fellow DUers that you think the mere mention of evil buzzwords is enough to set off the ignorant masses, and you don't need to explain yourself to them.

Tarc

(10,478 posts)
143. What this is is something generally referred to as "course correction"
Sun May 15, 2016, 01:48 AM
May 2016

The Sanders camp tried to snake delegates that they didn't earn a ways back, now that is apparently being set right.

Demsrule86

(68,825 posts)
156. I have an issue with your post
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:38 AM
May 2016

You stole the delegates in April by sending letters to Clinton supporters with the wrong time..the woman who did it was fired Thus democracy was thwarted by you in April...when you overturned a primary by sleazy tricks and gave yourself and unearned victory. Shame on you for stealing what was mostly minority votes.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
161. The Us vs Them thing knows few bounds, and when power is involved, well...
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:45 AM
May 2016

It's plagued humanity for as long as there has been history.

No group controlling power cedes it willingly. And the fight for control has been revealed this election cycle more than others.

Thanks to the internet, there is awareness of the voter registration problems from across the country. In context, if not intent, it is not clearly distinguishable from what deliberate acts against opponents would look like. And participants of the Democratic primaries and caucuses from across the country are very aware of that.

This event, along with the previous events, is another wedge that will contribute to impediments of unification.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
163. The 110 people who rec'd this sexist bullshit can never again deny the existence of BernieBros and
Sun May 15, 2016, 08:55 AM
May 2016

the misogyny they love to spread far and wide on the internet. Let this be exhibit 1,000,472,137,444.

As you can see clearly, a motion for recount is placed before the chair. A male comes and whispers something to the woman because Hillary's women are just like her who cannot think for themselves and and take orders from men.

In response to the male command, she ignores the motion for a recount and claims that there is a motion to change the rules.


OP has already been locked out of the thread for continuing to post sexist shit.


Il_Coniglietto

(373 posts)
166. Schadenfreude...the Germans got it right
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

Because I know on January 20, 2017 that woman who, as you call her, "cannot think for herself and takes orders from men" will be sworn in as President of the United States. That will be a beautiful day.

So type up whatever ridiculous, misogynist screed you want. Ain't gonna change a thing. Ain't gonna change my vote nor those of the MILLIONS of Americans who support Hillary over anyone else.

And you and all the folks who rec'd this thread know it.

Enjoy!!!

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)
179. Horse shit! You think Latinos and AAs won't come out to vote?
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:06 PM
May 2016

You do realize that no one can win a general election without that demographic?

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
172. The ISSUE ??????
Sun May 15, 2016, 09:58 AM
May 2016

I still don't understand why any Hillary supporter can actually address an ISSUE.
The author was deeply offended by this PERVERSION of Democracy, and maybe said something that might offend. But get a grip.

Hillary's campaign is lying, cheating and stealing right out in the open, caught on camera, and YOUR biggest concern is to attack the messenger for a comment you may not agree with? Really? Do any of you give a crap about the country at all? Or is it just about getting your own way? Doesn't matter how low you have to go, just as long as you get what you want? Because it is very hard to tell from what you post.

TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
175. "The author was deeply offended"
Sun May 15, 2016, 10:11 AM
May 2016

No, the author was deeply offensive. People who call themselves liberals and progressives and then wholeheartedly support this rant are neither.

Besides, as has been documented elsewhere in this thread and others, the blame lies firmly on Sanders supporters who didn't know the rules, changed party affiliation before yesterday, and/or didn't bother to show up.

Edit: Oh, and brought in from California. Oops.:

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
178. Fraud caught right on video
Sun May 15, 2016, 11:09 AM
May 2016

Do they actually believe we are going to go along with this? That the stadiums of awake people are going to self lobotomize and convert to mindless cool aide drinking zombies? I don't think so.

Florencenj2point0

(435 posts)
180. someone in the middle of a crowd of very loud bernie supporters
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:12 PM
May 2016

take a video with his/her iphone and it sounds like the ayes have it. I am SHOCKED!

Furthermore what is the evil rule? You have to be a democrat to be a seated delegate.

 

Buddyblazon

(3,014 posts)
181. While the commentary the OP used is terribly unfortunate....
Sun May 15, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

Seeing that type of behavior in Nevada...pretty disgusting.

Behavior like that does the opposite of unify the party.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
183. What a pile of bullshit.
Sun May 15, 2016, 03:00 PM
May 2016

I am going to be the first one to say "I told you so" (because I have, repeatedly and I am by no means alone on DU to have stated this in no uncertain terms).

When election fraud costs the Democratic party MULTIPLE elections in state races and in the presidential race I don't want to hear from one single person that smugly denied that there have been repeated instances of electoral fraud during the primary.

I don't want to hear one single person yell "Nader". If you have turned a blind eye to the multitude of "voting irregularities" and somehow think that all will be hunky dory in November, get ready, because this is what you will hear:

[font size=6 color=maroon] WE TOLD YOU SO![/font]

187. The only ones getting fooled here
Sun May 15, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

The only ones getting fooled here are the "Hillary or Bust" folks, and their willingness to cheat for their candidate. And Hillary's silence on the issue is deafening.

As the saying goes, there are none so blind than those who will not see.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
190. Another troll bites the dust after getting 130 rec's on a disgustingly sexist OP.
Mon May 16, 2016, 10:19 AM
May 2016

No way you get unflagged after you put your disgusting sexism on display. Good riddance.

And I'm glad someone brought this thread up in Ask The Administrators. Sure wish they would consider PPR's for people who encourage this nasty shit. Those who let it stand and those who reccomended it. How very liberal and progressive of you folks.




BainsBane

(53,137 posts)
195. Any change in the agenda first requires a motion to suspend the rules
Mon May 16, 2016, 05:10 PM
May 2016

I sat through hours of this the weekend before last. it's how conventions work.

Your sexist comments about women being unable to think for themselves is ironic considering you glob on to the first conspiracy theory that comes along and don't bother to learn about the proceedings. It also confirms to me the extend to which opposition to Clinton is about undermining my equal rights as a woman in this country.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's cheating caught...