Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Nate Silver Backlash by Ezra Klein
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/10/30/the-nate-silver-backlash/....SNIP....Then theres the backlash from more traditional media figures. Some of the arguments here have been downright weird, as when Politicos Josh Gerstein wrote, Isnt the basic problem with the Nate Silver prediction in question, and the critique, that it puts a percentage on a one-off event? Or when Politicos Jonathan Martin wrote, Avert your gaze, liberals: Nate Silver admits hes simply averaging public polls and there is no secret sauce. Or when Politicos Dylan Byers wrote, So should Mitt Romney win on Nov. 6, its difficult to see how people can continue to put faith in the predictions of someone who has never given that candidate anything higher than a 41 percent chance of winning. Come to think of it, a lot of the odder critiques of Silvers have been coming out of Politico. But that makes a kind of sense. Silvers work poses a threat to more traditional and, in particular, to more excitable forms of political punditry and horserace journalism.
More recently, we in the media and particularly we in the media at Politico have tried to grab an edge in the race for web traffic by hyping our election stories far beyond their actual importance. The latest gaffe is always a possible turning point, the momentum is always swinging wildly, the race is endlessly up in the air. It thus presents a bit of a problem for us if our readers then turn to sites like Silvers and find that none of this actually appears to be true and a clear-eyed look at the data shows a fairly stable race over long periods of time.
My guess is Silver and his successors will win this one, if only because, for all the very real shortcomings of models, election forecasters have better incentives than homepage editors.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1944 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Nate Silver Backlash by Ezra Klein (Original Post)
octoberlib
Oct 2012
OP
Orangepeel
(13,933 posts)1. I watched the movie "Moneyball" last night.
There is a scene in the movie where a bunch of old baseball scouts are talking about the strengths and weaknesses of players and how their years of experience are better than the numbers that Johan Hill's character is using. It reminded me of the political pundits talking about Silver.
Bigleaf
(2,050 posts)2. Great read. Thanks!