Should HRC release a few on her speeches

[sadoldgirl]

to WS or large corporation, how do we really know
whether they are original or just made up?

[uponit7771]

1. Who cares? tia

[sadoldgirl]

6. A lot of people do,

but your post just shows again, that she cannot
be trusted in the least.

[uponit7771]

8. Yes, there are 23 people who give a shit about some transcripts that aren't tax returns which at

... worst is only going to establish what those 23 people already thought about her and mean nothing else outside of that.

Again, who cares?!

[revbones]

11. Lots of people. Otherwise you wouldn't have to make posts like you just did

to try to deny it.

[uponit7771]

14. No one is denying anything... other than no one gives a shit about her transcripts who don't

... think at worst its going to establish what people who hate her already think about her.

There's no 47% there...

[revbones]

16. Lots of people care about her transcripts - otherwise she wouldn't have been asked

at debates multiple times.

Not so much on the tax returns for Bernie though. Once at a debate and he released already. How many transcripts has Hillary released yet?

[onecaliberal]

2. Good question. She is making that shit up as we speak.

[Avalux]

3. We don't know.

I keep picturing a room of people furiously re-writing them so they can be released at the "right time".

Conspiracy theory some will say, but it's completely plausible.

[eastwestdem]

4. If I was her I would just have some generic speech written and release that...

why give in to some guy who's not going to win anyway, and give the repubs fodder for the general?

[Mike Nelson]

5. No...

...she doesn't need to release them. The Clinton voters don't care and the Sanders voters aren't going to vote for her anyway. it's a waste of time. She's also over-investigated. We know enough about this woman.

[sadoldgirl]

7. You are right to the extent that most don't trust her.

[demwing]

9. yes she should, at least to set precedent

I don't even know why this should be a question

[krawhitham]

10. She Can't, she will lose if she does

No other reason for why she has not already released them

Sad part is they will leak before NOV, Mika from Morning Asshole has already said she knows of at least one reporter that has a copy

[quickesst]

12. Yep...

Releasing transcripts of speeches done while a private citizen is standard practice for presidential candidates. Wait, no it's not. I would tell them to spit in one hand and wish in the other and see which fills up first. It won't make a big difference in the outcome anyway.

[EndElectoral]

13. Still find it odd, no one who has listened to these speeches has leaked any of it to the press.

Either they were amazingly unmemorable OR people are fearful of litigation for releasing anything.

[sadoldgirl]

15. We may have to wait for the GE, when the repugs offer them.

[Deuce]

17. No...