2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumVatican Chancellor accuses Margaret Archer of LYING!!!
Oh my. It's getting nasty in the Vatican. Chancellor Sorondo is senior to Archer!
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senior-papal-official-untrue-sanders-invited-himself-vatican-173414032.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw
demwing
(16,916 posts)I'm sure there's a special place all set up...
Nanjeanne
(5,012 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)This is beyond absurd.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)An that is the sad part. After all bridges had been burned, the campaign now focuses on scorching earth.
And still they don't understand that such tactics don't work with the opposition BERNING toward victory.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)I don't get how anyone can admire the Clintons. I used to, but not for a long time.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)when folks get to know him, they start to like him. Clinton: currently polling at 57% distrust, and that is before New York and Pennsylvania get to know her better, let alone California.
(By the way: did you hear that Clinton's "lead" in California is evaporating faster than Anita Bryant's welcome at a gay wedding?)
Zira
(1,054 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)Why are you attacking Hillary in relation to this story?
What did I miss, what does this have to do with her campaign?
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)an agenda that has nothing to do with Bernie Sanders.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)But more than half your posts are jumping people who do.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)And he would eliminate the payroll taxes that fund popular programs like Social Security and Medicare
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Can you muster some outrage for Jane being attacked?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511682634#top
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)someone trying to make Hillary look bad by doing that.
It is of course horrible what they said
TM99
(8,352 posts)admit to yourself and others that the Tweets were in fact from Clinton supporters AND not right wing boogie men or agent provocateurs. Yet, you always jump to the attack of the 'Bernie Bros'.
Dude, we got your fucking number, and no one is buying your shit any more.
PatV
(71 posts)that will be remembered by Monday is the original lie.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I am unsure of Archer's motivation for what she said, but it was very bad form on her part. Why would she be politically motivated to lie about this?
Karma13612
(4,555 posts)Link but nothing yet.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)The only thing I could come up with, in which each of their (Sanders, Sorondo, Archer) words/actions made sense was this scenario:
Sanders, as he has said, has wanted to attend the PASS conference for many years and at some point that desire came to the attention of Sorondo;
In March, Sorondo had a discussion and an agreement with Archer to invite him;
On March 30th, Sorondo sends the invite in which he mentions Archer by name as also extending the invite, but it is signed only by Sorondo.
Sanders RSVPed (date of acceptance not released) to Sorondo since that's who signed the invite;
Archer was not in the loop that Sanders had RSVPed his acceptance;
Archers nose is out of joint from hearing on the news that Sanders will be attending and when contacted by the press, tells them that Sanders didn't followed PASS protocol and RSVP to her office.
And here we are...
What is very interesting is April 15th was the nexus date for two important events: the PASS conference and Hillary's desired date for the NY Debate. All of a sudden that date was being pushed very hard by Clinton. By April 4th, Sanders clearly knew he had/or would soon be accepting the invite to the Vatican. Did Hillary somehow know too, and try to force his hand, or was all this just very coincidental?
Regardless, Sanders, who could not have made it to both his NY rally originally scheduled for the 14th, and to the conference at the Vatican on the 15th, was able to point to Hillary's insistence of an Apr 15th debate date as the reason for changing his rally to Apr 15th. He was able to make hay of her 'forcing' him to change his rally date since she was not willing to change the date for her rich-people-only fundraiser, but really he would never have been able to attend a debate on that day anyway, due the Vatican conference.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)And Sorondo is senior to Archer
shawn703
(2,702 posts)I'll be glad when Bernie wraps up the nomination so they can go back under their rock.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Tarc
(10,479 posts)On the off-chance that Sanders would go to a conference there.
That's, like, 9 levels of deviousness right there...
Z_California
(650 posts)Tarc
(10,479 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Response to mainer (Original post)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Between the misrepresentation of the Hillary/Bernie dust up (yes, the Clinton camp's memo about disqualifying him started this mess - and it was obviously coordinated since she and her surrogates all bleated the same thing), the Krugman article today and now this mess, I believe they're gasping for their last breaths.
With the use of social media and the ease of finding alternative media sites, the M$M has lost its ability to manipulate the people.
Bernie's internals must be looking pretty good in New York. That's the only thing I can think of that would make them lose their collective minds like this.
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #19)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
MattP
(3,304 posts)If she feels disrespect from that so be it I suspect Vatican politics is nastier than even D.C.'s so im not suprised they bicker
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)If I was him I would fire her. I don't put up with lying liars.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Nope not good at all. I don't even care if someone is insubordinate to me it's like whatever. But, you make that chit public, buh bye.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
But, interesting assumption.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
http://news.trust.org/item/20160408180858-dibw3
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Edmond Malinvaud was the first president of the academy (1994-2004). In 2014 Pope Francis appointed Professor Margaret Archerpresident. PASS is headquartered in theCasina Pio IV, together with its sister academy the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, at the heart of the Vatican Gardens. The Chancellor of both academies is currently Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifical_Academy_of_Social_Sciences
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)has no limit to the term save the will of the Pontiff. He works for the Church, she is a lay person and head of a department at the University of Warwick. This Academy is a new thing by RCC standards. JP2 set it up, Sorondo has always been Chancellor, there have been three Presidents so far. They are ostensible peers but he is much the Senior and also he's the guy from St Pete's.
Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #64)
PotatoChip This message was self-deleted by its author.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Do you understand anything about the Catholic Church hierarchy?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But I can read the website where it says the President is the Head of the Academy (position) and selected by the Pope (reporting line).
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Renew Deal
(81,926 posts)What she did was wrong.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)They don't even acknowledge its existence.
More plates will surely be added to that clusterfuck of a table that is for sure.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)that it taxes even their finely-honed capacity for DoubleThink. The only solution is to ignore the facts that don't support the pre-authorized narrative.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...come on, man!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)or calls for it, should probably wait until it is determined who is lying.
One tell will be if the Chancellor is "re-assigned."
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
So ... the good Chancellor is the one lying. I guess you should retract the crow eating call.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)VATICAN CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)From the Academy's website:
http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)VATICAN CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was invited to speak at an April 15 Vatican event by the Vatican, a senior papal official said on Friday, denying a report that Sanders had invited himself.
"I deny that. It was not that way," Monsignor Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo told Reuters in a telephone interview while he was traveling in New York. Sorondo, a close aide to Pope Francis, is chancellor of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, which is hosting the event.
He said it was his idea to invite Sanders.
A Bloomberg report quoted Margaret Archer, president of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, as saying that Sanders had broken with protocol by failing to contact her office first.
"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcelo_S%C3%A1nchez_Sorondo
Archer lied for some reason:
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's okay to admit she lied, seriously. She overstepped her authority and was chided for it by the chancellor.
mainer
(12,039 posts)She's appointed by the Pontiff, who has the power to kick her out, too.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Edmond Malinvaud was the first president of the academy (1994-2004). In 2014 Pope Francis appointed Professor Margaret Archerpresident. PASS is headquartered in theCasina Pio IV, together with its sister academy the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, at the heart of the Vatican Gardens. The Chancellor of both academies is currently Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifical_Academy_of_Social_Sciences
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Wikipedia? ... Or, The academy's website?
I'll go with the Academy.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I don't really care who you believe, the reality is he's overseeing two academies, one of which Dr Asher is President.
He's one of the highest ranking permanent officials in the church. She is not.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Makes you wonder why they hate him so much.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I think he's caught up on the words "assisted by" in the Vatican website description.
.
I've done grant writing and development work.
One job was to raise funds for a new addition on a women's shelter. I had an appointment with a local casino to pitch the project but I was a late hire and didn't know every last detail yet on the building permit status, codes etc.
So even though I was the development director, my boss - the shelter director - came with me to assist.
Its pretty common in non-profits for "a boss" like a BOD membee to assist in projects. They're still the boss even though I may be the boss in my department.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Personally I wish Bernie would distance himself from the Vatican because of their homophobic and misogyinistic policies. At least I know he won't pander to them, he proved that when he stood up for us at Liberty U.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)"assisted by" words ... but more the "The Academy is headed by a President" part.
And yes ... I am Meh on, both, Bernie and HRC ... but MEH means "anti" per DU's community standards.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts).
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts).
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Claiming Sanders lied.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I feel sorry for them, it's the only way they know how to act.
revbones
(3,660 posts)and didn't realize where exactly the invitation came from.
Otherwise, why would she have seen fit to include such negativity and snarkiness in her comments?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)she was upset that her subordinate undercut her?
revbones
(3,660 posts)as well as who's names were on the invite.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
Like I said ...
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Edmond Malinvaud was the first president of the academy (1994-2004). In 2014 Pope Francis appointed Professor Margaret Archerpresident. PASS is headquartered in theCasina Pio IV, together with its sister academy the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, at the heart of the Vatican Gardens. The Chancellor of both academies is currently Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifical_Academy_of_Social_Sciences
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I don't really care who you believe, the reality is he's overseeing two academies, one of which Dr Asher is President.
He's one of the highest ranking permanent officials in the church. She is not.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)questionseverything
(9,671 posts)the 3rd of never
the gentleman that says he invited bernie is in the pope's inner circle, he is her go between to the pope
maybe she mis spoke ,maybe she was mis quoted
<shrug>
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)pat_k
(9,313 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)would be pulling their paddles out for Margaret Archer - prepare to be hit.
jillan
(39,451 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)MerryBlooms
(11,778 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)In their need to destroy Sanders, they don't care about facts or fact checking so long as it makes Sanders look bad. How many times has the media attempted to smear Sanders only to have the smear fall apart almost immediately.
840high
(17,196 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Yeah. I own Bloomberg, I wrote the letter, and I wrote the article about the letter. Yep. Little old me.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)long after it has been proven false. Why would you sacrifice your personal integrity in such a fashion unless it never meant much to you in the first place?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)...the disinformation I have been spreading.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The "discourtesy" was alleged by an unnamed "high official" but was denied by the official spokesperson. Another SwiftBoat attack fails.
SamKnause
(13,128 posts)The silliness as you call it, is coming from you.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Uh huh.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Too bad.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)"This is not true and she knows it. I invited him with her consensus," said Sorondo, who is senior to Archer.
Amaril
(1,267 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)If this were my employee she'd be fired.
She's the subordinate here and I think she's really overreached.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But, and again,
the Academy's website begs to differ.
http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I've done grant writing and development work.
One job was to raise funds for a new addition on a women's shelter. I had an appointment with a local casino to pitch the project but I was a late hire and didn't know every last detail yet on the building permit status, codes etc.
So even though I was the development director, my boss - the shelter director - came with me to assist.
Its pretty common in non-profits for "a boss" like a BOD membee to assist in projects. They're still the boss even though I may be the boss in my department.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)and stop letting your love of Bernie inform the facts.
http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/about/history.html
mainer
(12,039 posts)"In April 2014, Professor Archer was named by Pope Francis to succeed former Harvard law professor and U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See Mary Ann Glendon as President of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.[1]"
(Wikipedia.org)
She's only been in the position for two years. She can be kicked out by him, too.
dcbuckeye
(80 posts)It doesn't matter who's lying about the invite now because enough doubts have been raised about the intent of the trip. Enough doubt has been raised about BS's credibility for them to score any political points with Catholic Americans.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Latino community.
mainer
(12,039 posts)Margaret Archer's lie was exposed. Now comes the investigation into WHY she lied, who put her up to it, and why the media accepted that lie and blasted it out with no fact-checking.
dr60omg
(283 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Hopefully she will be fired before Bernie arrives.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Next liar who wants his or her lies kicked right back in their face, step right up.
mainer
(12,039 posts)First, it spreads the word far and wide that yes, he's been invited to the Vatican.
And it exposes just how many lies the opposition is ready to put out there to bring him down. It also exposes the names of the shoddy journalists who were willing to run with a liar named Margaret Archer without any fact-checking with the Vatican.
If anything, it's an expose of the powerful forces arrayed against him.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Part of the right-wing cabal in the Vatican trying to impede progress.
Response to nichomachus (Reply #66)
Renew Deal This message was self-deleted by its author.
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Are you able to read and stuff? If not, let me assist. The article way up at the very top of this page, well it allows as how this here Vatican tool up and told a dadburned lie about Bernie Sanders. She'll be working on a new ministry in Vladivostok in about 4 months or so, seein' as how she was caught being a lying piece of shit and all.
You guys had this one slammed right back in your faces at record speed. Bring me some more, sport-o.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)mainer
(12,039 posts)I'm thinking that the Vatican and the Chancellor are so pissed about Margaret Archer's comments that the Pope will meet with Sanders just out of principle.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)that the Pope has the temperament of something like a 20 year old Bernie Bro?
mainer
(12,039 posts)and the Pope wanting to make amends.
Uncle Joe
(58,666 posts)Thanks for the thread, mainer.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)A fable:
The river was wide and swift, and the scorpion stopped to reconsider the situation. She couldn't see any way across, so she ran upriver and then checked downriver, all the while thinking that she might have to turn back.
Suddenly, she saw a frog sitting in the rushes by the bank of the stream on the other side of the river. She decided to ask the frog for help getting across the stream.
"Hellooo Mr. Frog!" called the scorpion across the water, "Would you be so kind as to give me a ride on your back across the river?"
"Well now, Ms. Scorpion! How do I know that if I try to help you, you wont try to kill me?" asked the frog hesitantly.
"Because," the scorpion replied, "If I try to kill you, then I would die too, for you see I cannot swim!"
Now this seemed to make sense to the frog. But he asked. "What about when I get close to the bank? You could still try to kill me and get back to the shore!"
"This is true," agreed the scorpion, "But then I wouldn't be able to get to the other side of the river!"
"Alright then...how do I know you wont just wait till we get to the other side and THEN kill me?" said the frog.
"Ahh...," crooned the scorpion, "Because you see, once you've taken me to the other side of this river, I will be so grateful for your help, that it would hardly be fair to reward you with death, now would it?!"
So the frog agreed to take the scorpion across the river. He swam over to the bank and settled himself near the mud to pick up his passenger. The scorpion crawled onto the frog's back, her sharp claws prickling into the frog's soft hide, and the frog slid into the river. The muddy water swirled around them, but the frog stayed near the surface so the scorpion would not drown. He kicked strongly through the first half of the stream, his flippers paddling wildly against the current.
Halfway across the river, the frog suddenly felt a sharp sting in his back and, out of the corner of his eye, saw the scorpion remove her stinger from the frog's back. A deadening numbness began to creep into his limbs.
"You fool!" croaked the frog, "Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?"
The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog's back.
"I could not help myself. It is my nature."
Then they both sank into the muddy waters of the swiftly flowing river.
I've heard DUers ask that if Hillary is so confident of winning, why is she running such a sleazy campaign?
As the scorpion said - "I could not help myself. It is my nature."
Ino
(3,366 posts)Birthday: October 26
What a coincidence
kgnu_fan
(3,021 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Impedimentus
(898 posts)of the Academy. Yes, he is a bishop with the title Titular Bishop of Vescovio and informally addressed as "monsignor". They are essentially equals within the academy. However, being clergy and a bishop, he would never "report" to a lay person - only to the Pope in his position as a bishop.
I'm sure either Archer or Coronado could issue an invitation and it should not be controversial. Archer appears to have gotten her feathers ruffled. Surprise, the Vatican is political as well as religious.
FEEL THE BERN - 2016
snowy owl
(2,145 posts)Duppers
(28,138 posts)Or especially her supporters?
Wtf is it going to take for her supporters to get the facts that she and her campaign tell so many lies?
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)They.Are.Desparate
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.